Robotics Reduces Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Compared With Navigation

医学 机器人学 透视 辐射暴露 人工智能 腰椎 外科 医学物理学 核医学 机器人 计算机科学
作者
Pratyush Shahi,Avani S. Vaishnav,Kasra Araghi,Daniel Shinn,Junho Song,Sidhant Dalal,Dimitra Melissaridou,Eric Mai,Marcel Dupont,Evan Sheha,James Dowdell,Sravisht Iyer,Sheeraz A. Qureshi
出处
期刊:Spine [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:47 (18): 1279-1286 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1097/brs.0000000000004381
摘要

Study Design. Retrospective cohort. Objective. To compare robotics and navigation for minimally invasive elective lumbar fusion in terms of radiation exposure and time demand. Summary of Background Data. Although various studies have been conducted to demonstrate the benefits of both navigation and robotics over fluoroscopy in terms of radiation exposure, literature is lacking in studies comparing robotics versus navigation. Materials and Methods. Patients who underwent elective one-level or two-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) by a single surgeon using navigation (Stryker SpineMask) or robotics (ExcelsiusGPS) were included (navigation 2017–2019, robotics 2019–2021, resulting in prospective cohorts of consecutive patients for each modality). All surgeries had the intraoperative computed tomography workflow. The two cohorts were compared for radiation exposure [fluoroscopy time and radiation dose: image capture, surgical procedure, and overall) and time demand (time for setup and image capture, operative time, and total operating room (OR) time]. Results. A total of 244 patients (robotics 111, navigation 133) were included. The two cohorts were similar in terms of baseline demographics, primary/revision surgeries, and fusion levels. For one-level TLIF, total fluoroscopy time, total radiation dose, and % of radiation for surgical procedure were significantly less with robotics compared with navigation (20 vs. 25 s, P <0.001; 38 vs. 42 mGy, P =0.05; 58% vs. 65%, P =0.021). Although time for setup and image capture was significantly less with robotics (22 vs. 25 min, P <0.001) and operative time was significantly greater with robotics (103 vs. 93 min, P <0.001), there was no significant difference in the total OR time (145 vs. 141 min, P =0.25). Similar findings were seen for two-level TLIF as well. Conclusion. Robotics for minimally invasive TLIF, compared with navigation, leads to a significant reduction in radiation exposure both to the surgeon and patient, with no significant difference in the total OR time.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
duoduo完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
111222完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
夜曦完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
丫丫完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
世间安得双全法完成签到,获得积分0
4秒前
研妍完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
清脆晓曼完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
马桶盖盖子完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
shufessm完成签到,获得积分0
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
ssskong完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
烯灯完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
小马完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
loki完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
奔跑西木完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
旭龙完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
研友_ZegMrL完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
KY Mr.WANG完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
loey完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
ssskong发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
奶糖最可爱完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
badada发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
柳觅夏完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
儒雅沛凝完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
可乐bid完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
杭啊完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
sanyecai发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
喜悦静枫完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
隐形曼青应助ssskong采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
泉水丁冬2023完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
HUAN完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
高分求助中
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
宽禁带半导体紫外光电探测器 388
Case Research: The Case Writing Process 300
Global Geological Record of Lake Basins 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3142849
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2793788
关于积分的说明 7807722
捐赠科研通 2450106
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1303653
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627017
版权声明 601350