Is blue light imaging without magnification satisfactory as screening for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? Post‐hoc analysis of multicenter randomized controlled trial

医学 彩色内窥镜 食管鳞状细胞癌 放大倍数 基底细胞 析因分析 随机对照试验 内科学 胃肠病学 核医学 放射科 癌症 结肠镜检查 结直肠癌 计算机科学 计算机视觉
作者
Yohei Ogata,Waku Hatta,Tomoyuki Koike,So Takahashi,Tamotsu Matsuhashi,Wataru Iwai,Sho Asonuma,Hideki Okata,Motoki Ohyauchi,Hirotaka Ito,Yasuhiko Abe,Yu Sasaki,Masashi Kawamura,Masahiro Saito,Kaname Uno,Fumiyoshi Fujishima,Tomohiro Nakamura,Naoki Nakaya,Katsunori Iijima,Atsushi Masamune
出处
期刊:Digestive Endoscopy [Wiley]
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1111/den.14788
摘要

Objectives Narrow light observation is currently recommended as an alternative to Lugol chromoendoscopy (LCE) to detect esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Studies revealed little difference in sensitivity between the two modalities in expert settings; however, these included small numbers of cases. We aimed to determine whether blue light imaging (BLI) without magnification is satisfactory for preventing misses of ESCC. Methods This was a post‐hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial targeting patients at high risk of ESCC in expert settings. In this study, BLI without magnification followed by LCE was performed. The evaluation parameters included: (i) the diagnostic abilities of ESCC; (ii) the endoscopic characteristics of lesions with diagnostic differences between the two modalities; and (iii) the color difference between cancerous and noncancerous areas in BLI and LCE. Results This study identified ESCC in 49 of 699 cases. Of these cases, nine (18.4%) were missed by BLI but detected by LCE. In per‐patient analysis, the sensitivity of BLI was lower than that of LCE following BLI (83.7% vs. 100.0%; P = 0.013), whereas the specificity and accuracy of BLI were higher (88.2% vs. 81.2%; P < 0.001 and 87.8% vs. 82.5%; P < 0.001, respectively). No significant endoscopic characteristics were identified, but the color difference was lower in BLI than in LCE (21.4 vs. 25.1; P = 0.003). Conclusion LCE following BLI outperformed BLI in terms of sensitivity in patients with high‐risk ESCC. Therefore, LCE, in addition to BLI, would still be required in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy even by expert endoscopists.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
ChatGPT发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
2秒前
多发论文完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
su发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Xw关闭了Xw文献求助
4秒前
大个应助fjm采纳,获得10
7秒前
而为发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
机智思真发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
木樨316完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
10秒前
花花完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
沉默的小天鹅应助耀阳采纳,获得10
12秒前
lilila666完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
lilila666发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
艺术家脾气完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
丘比特应助qqq采纳,获得10
19秒前
21秒前
crazy发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
Wayne72完成签到,获得积分0
27秒前
阿飞发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
Zoki完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
mini发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
30秒前
烟雨完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
彭栋应助文献采纳,获得30
32秒前
祖国小红花完成签到,获得积分20
32秒前
fighting完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
来我家喝桂花茶完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
38秒前
852应助一方通行采纳,获得10
38秒前
39秒前
39秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
而为完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
gege完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3989378
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3531442
关于积分的说明 11254002
捐赠科研通 3270126
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1804887
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882087
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809173