Malocclusion or laterorhinia: Which one impacts aesthetic facial perception the most?

牙科 鼻子 口腔正畸科 吸引力 显著性差异 错牙合 容貌吸引力 标准差 方差分析 医学 数学 心理学 解剖 统计 精神分析
作者
Iris Trindade de Paiva Ghiu,Rafael Cunha Bittencourt,Joana Figueiredo Seixas,Ricardo Martins Machado,Alexandre Trindade Motta,Cláudia Trindade Mattos
出处
期刊:Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research [Wiley]
卷期号:27 (2): 297-302 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1111/ocr.12727
摘要

Abstract Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the perception of facial attractiveness when nose and teeth, together or isolated, present different degrees of disharmony. The secondary objective was to compare the perception of laypersons with that of dentists. Materials and Methods This cross‐sectional observational study included 112 individuals (58 laypersons and 54 dentists) that evaluated 6 manipulated images of the face of the same model, scoring their attractiveness using 10 cm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), with least and most attractive at the left and right anchors, respectively. The images contained manipulations performed only on the nose (laterorhinia) and mouth (misaligned teeth), as follows: (1) standard photograph, with symmetrical nose + aligned teeth; (2) 2 mm nasal deviation + aligned teeth; (3) 4 mm nasal deviation + aligned teeth; (4) symmetrical nose + misaligned teeth; (5) 2 mm nasal deviation + misaligned teeth and (6) 4 mm nasal deviation + misaligned teeth. We used the repeated measures ANOVA test and Tukey's post‐test for intra‐group comparison of the images. The independent t‐test was used for inter‐group comparison of each image. Results In the laypersons' group, the highest grades were given to images with aligned teeth and the lowest to misaligned teeth (smallest mean difference = 2.88 cm). For this group, there was no statistically significant difference ( P ‐values ranged from .988 to 1.000) between scores of the three images in which teeth were aligned (range of 7.70–7.78 cm). In the group of dentists, highest grades were given to images with aligned teeth and the lowest to misaligned teeth. Difference between images 3 and 4 was not statistically significant ( P = .204). All other differences between any image of straight teeth and any image with misaligned teeth were significant and the smallest mean difference between the two groups of images was 1.87 ( P = .039). However, in the images with aligned teeth, there was also a statistically significant difference with higher scores to the images with symmetrical nose in contrast with those with significant laterorhinia (mean difference = 1.03 cm). Conclusion Teeth disharmonies had a more negative impact on the aesthetic perception of the face than did nose deviations, for both dentists and laypersons.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
李健应助阿童木采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
田様应助烂漫夜梅采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
不想起昵称完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
精明外套发布了新的文献求助50
4秒前
shangfeng发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
彭于彦祖应助asdfghjkl采纳,获得30
5秒前
6秒前
天天快乐应助甜甜玫瑰采纳,获得10
6秒前
迷人芙蓉发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
2222bbnm发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
雅雅发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
稳重醉香发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
封城岁月发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
冰阔落完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
周星星完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
皮卡丘发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
zx完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
爆米花应助安静的棉花糖采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
smallant发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
向晚发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
single发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
精明外套完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
大皿同学发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
在水一方应助gsp采纳,获得10
17秒前
橙子完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
A new approach of magnetic circular dichroism to the electronic state analysis of intact photosynthetic pigments 500
Diagnostic immunohistochemistry : theranostic and genomic applications 6th Edition 500
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3148940
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2800005
关于积分的说明 7837927
捐赠科研通 2457512
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1307891
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 628322
版权声明 601685