Effects of maternal probiotic supplementation on breast milk microbiome and infant gut microbiome and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

微生物群 医学 母乳 随机对照试验 益生菌 母乳喂养 人口 置信区间 荟萃分析 生理学 内科学 生物 儿科 环境卫生 生物信息学 细菌 生物化学 遗传学
作者
Bekalu Kassie Alemu,Getnet Gedefaw,Ling Wu,So Ling Lau,Chi Chiu Wang,Yao Wang
出处
期刊:American Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:5 (11): 101148-101148 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101148
摘要

OBJECTIVE The early-life microbiome is formed during the perinatal period and is critical for infants' lifelong health. This is established by maternal-infant microbiome crosstalk, which is mediated by the breast milk microbiome. The milk microbiome is dependent on the maternal gut microbiome, suggesting that it could potentially be restored through oral probiotic supplements. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effect of maternal probiotic supplements on breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and on infant health. DATA SOURCES The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Science Direct databases were searched until December 15, 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials following the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (population: pregnant or lactating women; intervention: probiotics; control: placebo or follow-up; outcome: breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and infant health) principles were included. METHODS Using a random effect model, the standard mean difference, risk difference, and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval were used to measure each outcome. All analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat approach. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics. RESULTS The final data set included 24 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2761 mothers and 1756 infants. The overall effect of probiotics on the beneficial bacteria detection rate in breast milk had a risk difference of 24% (95% confidence interval, 0.1–0.37; P<.001; I2=91.12%). The pooled mean beneficial and pathogenic bacteria abundance in breast milk had a standard mean difference of 1.22 log10 colony forming units/mL (95% confidence interval, 0.48–1.97; P<.001; I2=95.51%) and −1.05 log10 colony forming unites/mL (95% confidence interval, −1.99 to −0.12; P=.03; I2=96.79%), respectively. The overall abundance of beneficial bacteria in the infant gut had a standard mean difference of 0.89 log10 colony forming units/g (95% confidence interval, 0.22–1.56; P=.01; I2=95.01%). It also controlled infant weight gain (standard mean difference, −0.49 kg/equivalent age; 95% confidence interval, −0.82 to −0.17; P<.001; I2=0.00%) and decreased the occurrence of infantile colic (risk ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.57; P<.001; I2=0.00%). CONCLUSION Maternal probiotic supplements effectively orchestrate the breast milk and infant gut microbiome with a wide range of clinical benefits and safety. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus thermophilus, and S. boulardii can be used as maternal supplements to promote infant health. The early-life microbiome is formed during the perinatal period and is critical for infants' lifelong health. This is established by maternal-infant microbiome crosstalk, which is mediated by the breast milk microbiome. The milk microbiome is dependent on the maternal gut microbiome, suggesting that it could potentially be restored through oral probiotic supplements. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effect of maternal probiotic supplements on breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and on infant health. The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Science Direct databases were searched until December 15, 2022. Randomized controlled trials following the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (population: pregnant or lactating women; intervention: probiotics; control: placebo or follow-up; outcome: breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and infant health) principles were included. Using a random effect model, the standard mean difference, risk difference, and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval were used to measure each outcome. All analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat approach. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics. The final data set included 24 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2761 mothers and 1756 infants. The overall effect of probiotics on the beneficial bacteria detection rate in breast milk had a risk difference of 24% (95% confidence interval, 0.1–0.37; P<.001; I2=91.12%). The pooled mean beneficial and pathogenic bacteria abundance in breast milk had a standard mean difference of 1.22 log10 colony forming units/mL (95% confidence interval, 0.48–1.97; P<.001; I2=95.51%) and −1.05 log10 colony forming unites/mL (95% confidence interval, −1.99 to −0.12; P=.03; I2=96.79%), respectively. The overall abundance of beneficial bacteria in the infant gut had a standard mean difference of 0.89 log10 colony forming units/g (95% confidence interval, 0.22–1.56; P=.01; I2=95.01%). It also controlled infant weight gain (standard mean difference, −0.49 kg/equivalent age; 95% confidence interval, −0.82 to −0.17; P<.001; I2=0.00%) and decreased the occurrence of infantile colic (risk ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.57; P<.001; I2=0.00%). Maternal probiotic supplements effectively orchestrate the breast milk and infant gut microbiome with a wide range of clinical benefits and safety. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus thermophilus, and S. boulardii can be used as maternal supplements to promote infant health.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
机智一曲发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
我迷了鹿完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
kin完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
My完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
slj完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Leon发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
StonesKing发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助乔七采纳,获得10
4秒前
EPP233发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
乐观睫毛发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
落花生完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
风中雪一完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
小王完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
DX120210165完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
归尘应助哇wwwww采纳,获得10
7秒前
小xy完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
酷炫的雪兰完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
樱香音子发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
冷风完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
鱼鱼鱼完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
戚薇发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
苏silence发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Helly发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Liu给Liu的求助进行了留言
9秒前
wzxhhh完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
调皮冰旋完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
汉堡包应助右右采纳,获得10
10秒前
冰糕完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
风中雪一发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
铎幸福完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 330
Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der linguistischen Forschung 300
Current Perspectives on Generative SLA - Processing, Influence, and Interfaces 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3986618
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3529071
关于积分的说明 11243225
捐赠科研通 3267556
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1803784
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 881185
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 808582