Effects of maternal probiotic supplementation on breast milk microbiome and infant gut microbiome and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

微生物群 医学 母乳 随机对照试验 益生菌 母乳喂养 人口 置信区间 荟萃分析 生理学 内科学 生物 儿科 环境卫生 生物信息学 生物化学 遗传学 细菌
作者
Bekalu Kassie Alemu,Getnet Gedefaw,Ling Wu,So Ling Lau,Chi Chiu Wang,Yao Wang
出处
期刊:American Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm [Elsevier]
卷期号:5 (11): 101148-101148 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101148
摘要

OBJECTIVE The early-life microbiome is formed during the perinatal period and is critical for infants' lifelong health. This is established by maternal-infant microbiome crosstalk, which is mediated by the breast milk microbiome. The milk microbiome is dependent on the maternal gut microbiome, suggesting that it could potentially be restored through oral probiotic supplements. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effect of maternal probiotic supplements on breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and on infant health. DATA SOURCES The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Science Direct databases were searched until December 15, 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials following the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (population: pregnant or lactating women; intervention: probiotics; control: placebo or follow-up; outcome: breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and infant health) principles were included. METHODS Using a random effect model, the standard mean difference, risk difference, and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval were used to measure each outcome. All analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat approach. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics. RESULTS The final data set included 24 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2761 mothers and 1756 infants. The overall effect of probiotics on the beneficial bacteria detection rate in breast milk had a risk difference of 24% (95% confidence interval, 0.1–0.37; P<.001; I2=91.12%). The pooled mean beneficial and pathogenic bacteria abundance in breast milk had a standard mean difference of 1.22 log10 colony forming units/mL (95% confidence interval, 0.48–1.97; P<.001; I2=95.51%) and −1.05 log10 colony forming unites/mL (95% confidence interval, −1.99 to −0.12; P=.03; I2=96.79%), respectively. The overall abundance of beneficial bacteria in the infant gut had a standard mean difference of 0.89 log10 colony forming units/g (95% confidence interval, 0.22–1.56; P=.01; I2=95.01%). It also controlled infant weight gain (standard mean difference, −0.49 kg/equivalent age; 95% confidence interval, −0.82 to −0.17; P<.001; I2=0.00%) and decreased the occurrence of infantile colic (risk ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.57; P<.001; I2=0.00%). CONCLUSION Maternal probiotic supplements effectively orchestrate the breast milk and infant gut microbiome with a wide range of clinical benefits and safety. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus thermophilus, and S. boulardii can be used as maternal supplements to promote infant health. The early-life microbiome is formed during the perinatal period and is critical for infants' lifelong health. This is established by maternal-infant microbiome crosstalk, which is mediated by the breast milk microbiome. The milk microbiome is dependent on the maternal gut microbiome, suggesting that it could potentially be restored through oral probiotic supplements. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effect of maternal probiotic supplements on breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and on infant health. The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Science Direct databases were searched until December 15, 2022. Randomized controlled trials following the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (population: pregnant or lactating women; intervention: probiotics; control: placebo or follow-up; outcome: breast milk and infant gut microbiome composition and infant health) principles were included. Using a random effect model, the standard mean difference, risk difference, and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval were used to measure each outcome. All analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat approach. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics. The final data set included 24 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2761 mothers and 1756 infants. The overall effect of probiotics on the beneficial bacteria detection rate in breast milk had a risk difference of 24% (95% confidence interval, 0.1–0.37; P<.001; I2=91.12%). The pooled mean beneficial and pathogenic bacteria abundance in breast milk had a standard mean difference of 1.22 log10 colony forming units/mL (95% confidence interval, 0.48–1.97; P<.001; I2=95.51%) and −1.05 log10 colony forming unites/mL (95% confidence interval, −1.99 to −0.12; P=.03; I2=96.79%), respectively. The overall abundance of beneficial bacteria in the infant gut had a standard mean difference of 0.89 log10 colony forming units/g (95% confidence interval, 0.22–1.56; P=.01; I2=95.01%). It also controlled infant weight gain (standard mean difference, −0.49 kg/equivalent age; 95% confidence interval, −0.82 to −0.17; P<.001; I2=0.00%) and decreased the occurrence of infantile colic (risk ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.57; P<.001; I2=0.00%). Maternal probiotic supplements effectively orchestrate the breast milk and infant gut microbiome with a wide range of clinical benefits and safety. Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus thermophilus, and S. boulardii can be used as maternal supplements to promote infant health.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
你好世界完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
山南水北发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
恰恰完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
阿斯顿发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
LZH发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
xx完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
哈哈哈哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
JS32完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
猪猪包发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
Hello应助淡淡菠萝采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
恰恰发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Haisenky发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
斯文败类应助明明采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
SciGPT应助周芷卉采纳,获得10
7秒前
天天快乐应助研友_闾丘枫采纳,获得10
7秒前
酷波er应助123123采纳,获得10
8秒前
零肆零陆完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
猪猪包完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
研友_闾丘枫完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
AAA完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
jovi发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
慈祥的曼香完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
Simone发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
个性的紫菜应助LZH采纳,获得10
15秒前
自然秋柳完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
高分求助中
The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition (Second Edition, 2024) 1050
Kinetics of the Esterification Between 2-[(4-hydroxybutoxy)carbonyl] Benzoic Acid with 1,4-Butanediol: Tetrabutyl Orthotitanate as Catalyst 1000
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3140690
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2791543
关于积分的说明 7799499
捐赠科研通 2447880
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1302159
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 626459
版权声明 601194