亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

A Simplified Red Blood Cell Folate Calculation: Comparison to the Traditional Calculation Using Data from NHANES 2007–2010

红细胞压积 人口 血红蛋白 医学 数学 动物科学 统计 内科学 生物 环境卫生
作者
Mindy Zhang,Maya Sternberg,Christine M Pfeiffer
出处
期刊:The FASEB Journal [Wiley]
卷期号:31 (S1)
标识
DOI:10.1096/fasebj.31.1_supplement.786.3
摘要

Red blood cell folate (RBF) concentrationsare considered an accurate indicator of folate body stores and are usuallymeasured to assess the population baseline status or the impact of folateintervention. The traditional calculation of RBF requires 3 components, wholeblood folate (WBF), serum folate (SFOL), and hematocrit (Hct) and is calculatedas [WBF–SFOL(1–Hct/100)]/(Hct/100). In some cases data for SFOL and/or Hct maynot be available, but the hemoglobin (Hb) concentration is generally availablein health and nutrition surveys. Using data for persons 1 y and olderparticipating in NHANES 2007–2010 (n ~ 17000), we investigated whether asimplified calculation generated accurate RBF results. The available dataincluded SFOL and RBF measured by use of microbiologic assay, Hct, Hb, and meancell Hb content (MCHC); population median values for these indicators were 39.8nmol/L, 1070 nmol/L, 40.8%, 140 g/L, and 344 g/L, respectively. We calculatedthe WBF concentration as (RBF*Hct/100)+SFOL(1–Hct/100). We calculated anestimated Hct as Hb/MCHC, using the population median MCHC; the populationmedian estimated Hct was 40.8%. We investigated 5 simplified calculationscenarios: 1) use simple formula by ignoring SFOL (WBF/Hct); 2) use an imputed SFOLconcentration of 40 nmol/L; 3) use an imputed Hct value of 40%; 4) use an estimated Hct value; 5) use both an imputed SFOL value and an estimated Hct value with WBFand Hb being the only measured parameters. We compared geometric mean RBF results from these 5 scenarios with traditionally calculated RBF results for the entire population and demographic subgroups of age, gender and race‐ethnicity, as well as for women of reproductive age (WRA, 15–44 y). Compared to the traditional formula, the simple formula (ignoring SFOL) produced on average 5.6% (4.5–9.6% in subgroups; 5.9% in WRA) higher RBF results. Using an imputed SFOL concentration had on average 0% bias (−1.2% to 2.8% in subgroups; −1.2% in WRA). Using an imputed Hct value had on average 1.9% bias (−9.2% to 7.6% in subgroups; −3.9% in WRA). Using an estimatedHct had on average 0% bias (−3.5% to 3.5% in subgroups; 0% in WRA). Using both an imputed SFOL and an estimated Hct had on average 0% bias (−1.4% to 1.9%| in subgroups). In summary, ignoring the SFOL concentration in the calculation of RBF or using an imputed Hct value bias the RBF results by as much as 10% incertain demographic subgroups. Conversely, using the population median SFOL as an imputed value, or the estimated Hct, or a combination of the 2 parameters resulted in small average biases. This demonstrates the potential of simplifying the RBF calculation to estimate central tendency in a population by only measuring WBF and Hb in each study participant and by using an estimated population median SFOL value derived from a small subsample. However, this approach will not accurately predict an individual RBF value. These initial findings need to be confirmed in other data sets, particularly in settings with low folate status. Furthermore, the impact of the simplified calculation on prevalence estimates using different folate cutoff value has to be assessed.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
sss发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
3秒前
jessica完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
aowulan完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
jessica发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
Sid完成签到,获得积分0
13秒前
可久斯基完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
Rjy完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
华仔应助zhoux采纳,获得10
23秒前
兴奋的故事完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
27秒前
27秒前
Ansaista发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
Tony完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
31秒前
夏蓉完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
Cain发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
37秒前
enli完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
Ansaista完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
南笺完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
coc发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
斯文败类应助研友_qZ6V1Z采纳,获得10
53秒前
Baraka完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
Cao完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
xie完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
zzz完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
刘明坤完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
zhoux发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
上官若男应助ceeray23采纳,获得20
1分钟前
研友_qZ6V1Z发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
星辰大海应助towerman采纳,获得10
1分钟前
xutong de完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
qpp完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3990012
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3532049
关于积分的说明 11256153
捐赠科研通 3270925
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1805123
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882270
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809216