医学
随机对照试验
髋部骨折
麻醉
类阿片
吗啡
股骨骨折
外科
股骨
骨质疏松症
内科学
受体
作者
Xufeng Lin,Christopher Weiyang Liu,Qing Yuan Goh,Eileen Yilin Sim,Steffi Kang Ting Chan,Zhen Wei Lim,Diana Xin Hui Chan
出处
期刊:Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
[BMJ]
日期:2023-04-13
卷期号:48 (11): 535-539
被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1136/rapm-2022-104117
摘要
The pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) is a novel technique that blocks the articular branches of the hip joint. This study aimed to compare its effectiveness to a sham block in elderly patients with hip fractures.A randomized double-blind controlled trial was conducted in elderly patients with intertrochanteric and neck of femur fractures. Patients were randomized to receive either PENG block or a sham block. Postblock, systemic analgesia was titrated using a standardized protocol of acetaminophen, oral morphine or patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was the dynamic pain score (Numerical Rating Scale 0-10) at 30 min postblock. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at multiple other time points and 24-hour opioid consumption.60 patients were randomized and 57 completed the trial (PENG n=28, control n=29). Patients in PENG group had significantly lower dynamic pain scores at 30 min compared with control group (median (IQR) 3 (0.5-5) vs 5 (3-10), p<0.01). For the secondary outcomes, dynamic pain scores were lower in PENG group at 1 hour (median (IQR) 2 (1-3.25) vs 5 (3-8), p<0.01) and 3 hours postblock (median (IQR) 2 (0-5) vs 5 (2-8), p<0.05). Patients in PENG group had lower 24-hour opioid consumption (median (IQR) oral morphine equivalent dose 10 (0-15) vs 15 (10-30) mg, p<0.05).PENG block provided effective analgesia for acute traumatic pain following hip fracture. Further studies are required to validate the superiority of PENG blocks over other regional techniques.NCT04996979.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI