Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for early pain management of elderly patients with hip fracture: a single-center double-blind randomized controlled trial

医学 随机对照试验 髋部骨折 麻醉 类阿片 吗啡 外科 骨质疏松症 内科学 受体
作者
Xufeng Lin,Christopher Weiyang Liu,Qing Yuan Goh,Eileen Yilin Sim,Steffi Kang Ting Chan,Zhen Wei Lim,Diana Xin Hui Chan
出处
期刊:Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine [BMJ]
卷期号:48 (11): 535-539 被引量:22
标识
DOI:10.1136/rapm-2022-104117
摘要

The pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) is a novel technique that blocks the articular branches of the hip joint. This study aimed to compare its effectiveness to a sham block in elderly patients with hip fractures.A randomized double-blind controlled trial was conducted in elderly patients with intertrochanteric and neck of femur fractures. Patients were randomized to receive either PENG block or a sham block. Postblock, systemic analgesia was titrated using a standardized protocol of acetaminophen, oral morphine or patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was the dynamic pain score (Numerical Rating Scale 0-10) at 30 min postblock. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at multiple other time points and 24-hour opioid consumption.60 patients were randomized and 57 completed the trial (PENG n=28, control n=29). Patients in PENG group had significantly lower dynamic pain scores at 30 min compared with control group (median (IQR) 3 (0.5-5) vs 5 (3-10), p<0.01). For the secondary outcomes, dynamic pain scores were lower in PENG group at 1 hour (median (IQR) 2 (1-3.25) vs 5 (3-8), p<0.01) and 3 hours postblock (median (IQR) 2 (0-5) vs 5 (2-8), p<0.05). Patients in PENG group had lower 24-hour opioid consumption (median (IQR) oral morphine equivalent dose 10 (0-15) vs 15 (10-30) mg, p<0.05).PENG block provided effective analgesia for acute traumatic pain following hip fracture. Further studies are required to validate the superiority of PENG blocks over other regional techniques.NCT04996979.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
ZXH完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
Lxxixixi发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
yu完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小松松完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
lzw123456完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
liuhang完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
今天也要努力呀完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
lalahh发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
ccc发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
嗖嗖完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
所所应助xu采纳,获得30
5秒前
6秒前
rabbit发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
山复尔尔发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
mumu发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
迷人如冬发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Lxxixixi完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
13455完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Zym张迎濛完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
或无情完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
123关闭了123文献求助
9秒前
远方完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
俏皮的采蓝完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
英姑应助小鱼女侠采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
Lucas应助成太采纳,获得10
11秒前
ynn完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Pipeline and riser loss of containment 2001 - 2020 (PARLOC 2020) 1000
Artificial Intelligence driven Materials Design 600
Investigation the picking techniques for developing and improving the mechanical harvesting of citrus 500
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 500
A Manual for the Identification of Plant Seeds and Fruits : Second revised edition 500
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.) 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5192215
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4375198
关于积分的说明 13624085
捐赠科研通 4229463
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2319944
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1318415
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1268598