医学
股静脉
动静脉瘘
外科
静脉
瘘管
前瞻性队列研究
单中心
随机对照试验
放射科
作者
Mohammed Alsagheer Alhewy,Abdelaziz Ahmed Abdelhafez,Mohamed Metwally,Ehab Abd elmoneim Ghazala,Alhussein M. khedr,Ahmed Khamis,Hassan Gado,Wael Abdo Abdo Abd‐Elgawad,Abdullah El Sayed,Abdelhalim A Abdelmohsen
标识
DOI:10.1177/02683555241236824
摘要
To compare femoral endovenectomy with the creation of an arteriovenous fistula (FE + AVF), versus iliofemoral endovenous stenting with the concurrent extended femoral vein (FV-S) stenting in patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (IFVO).In a randomized prospective single-center study, 48 received (FV-S), while the other 54 had (FE + AVF).There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes between the two groups (FV-S) and (FE + AVF) (59% vs 56.8%, 75% vs 79.1%, respectively). At a median of 13 months after the treatment. However, the FV-S group's patients experienced fewer postoperative problems (p = .012), shorter procedures (p = .001), and shorter stays in the hospital (p = .025).There is no difference between the efficacy and symptomatic resolution of the FV-S group and the FE + AVF group at the same time, FV-S has lower postoperative complications and a shorter procedure duration and hospital stay.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI