亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Using the design-thinking method to develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning (PES-TBL) for nursing students

克朗巴赫阿尔法 结构效度 心理学 验证性因素分析 比例(比率) 同行评估 探索性因素分析 构造(python库) 判别效度 可靠性(半导体) 内容有效性 有效性 应用心理学 医学教育 数学教育 计算机科学 结构方程建模 心理测量学 医学 临床心理学 物理 功率(物理) 机器学习 程序设计语言 量子力学 内部一致性
作者
Young-Ran Kweon,Jungrim Park
出处
期刊:Nurse Education Today [Elsevier]
卷期号:127: 105849-105849 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105849
摘要

Peer evaluation in team-based learning provides meaningful information about the learning process and dynamics. Despite the importance of peer evaluation in learner-centred learning, there is a lack of valid and reliable scales that reflect students' experiences in the classroom. To develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. A cross-sectional methodological study. Four universities located in Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Eight nursing students exposed to team-based learning voluntarily participated in a design-thinking project, and eight nursing professors were selected for content validity. For the validation of the Scale, 722 nursing students were randomly selected. The design-thinking method was implemented to develop the Scale, and a questionnaire was used to assess the Scale's construct validity and reliability. The construct validity was examined in a split-half analysis with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and composite reliability were investigated for the peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. A 12-item tool, with each item using a 5-point scale for peer evaluation, was developed through the empathise, define, ideate, prototype, and test stages of the design-thinking method. Exploratory factor analysis identified three factors from the 12 items: responsibility, initiative, and collaboration. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the tool had acceptable convergent and discriminant validity, thus confirming good construct validity. All values for reliability were >0.70. This study was noteworthy in that it employed the design-thinking method to reflect learners' opinions in developing a peer evaluation instrument. Moreover, the study demonstrated adequate evidence of reliability and validity. Consequently, the developed Scale can be effectively applied to team-based learning assessments for nursing students.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wanci应助圈圈圆了采纳,获得50
刚刚
5秒前
坚定的小蘑菇完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
hh完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
大模型应助选波采纳,获得10
17秒前
huang完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
小湛完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
JamesPei应助纸鹤采纳,获得10
25秒前
36秒前
41秒前
纸鹤发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
选波发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
49秒前
由道罡完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
失眠的惮发布了新的文献求助10
53秒前
CodeCraft应助水水水采纳,获得10
55秒前
kekao发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
上官若男应助Hayward采纳,获得10
1分钟前
香蕉觅云应助选波采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
清飏应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1分钟前
kekao完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
水水水发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
bkagyin应助gdpu_omics采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
小不点完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
tlj0808发布了新的文献求助20
1分钟前
选波发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
今后应助小不点采纳,获得10
1分钟前
小袁完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
AU完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
顺心蜜粉完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
TsuKe完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
Criminology34应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
顺心蜜粉发布了新的文献求助100
3分钟前
高分求助中
From Victimization to Aggression 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Reproduction Third Edition 3000
Comprehensive Methanol Science Production, Applications, and Emerging Technologies 2000
化妆品原料学 1000
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
小学科学课程与教学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5644645
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4764877
关于积分的说明 15025423
捐赠科研通 4803014
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2567817
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1525416
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1484958