已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Using the design-thinking method to develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning (PES-TBL) for nursing students

克朗巴赫阿尔法 结构效度 心理学 验证性因素分析 比例(比率) 同行评估 探索性因素分析 构造(python库) 判别效度 可靠性(半导体) 内容有效性 有效性 应用心理学 医学教育 数学教育 计算机科学 结构方程建模 心理测量学 医学 临床心理学 物理 功率(物理) 机器学习 程序设计语言 量子力学 内部一致性
作者
Young-Ran Kweon,Jungrim Park
出处
期刊:Nurse Education Today [Elsevier]
卷期号:127: 105849-105849 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105849
摘要

Peer evaluation in team-based learning provides meaningful information about the learning process and dynamics. Despite the importance of peer evaluation in learner-centred learning, there is a lack of valid and reliable scales that reflect students' experiences in the classroom. To develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. A cross-sectional methodological study. Four universities located in Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Eight nursing students exposed to team-based learning voluntarily participated in a design-thinking project, and eight nursing professors were selected for content validity. For the validation of the Scale, 722 nursing students were randomly selected. The design-thinking method was implemented to develop the Scale, and a questionnaire was used to assess the Scale's construct validity and reliability. The construct validity was examined in a split-half analysis with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and composite reliability were investigated for the peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. A 12-item tool, with each item using a 5-point scale for peer evaluation, was developed through the empathise, define, ideate, prototype, and test stages of the design-thinking method. Exploratory factor analysis identified three factors from the 12 items: responsibility, initiative, and collaboration. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the tool had acceptable convergent and discriminant validity, thus confirming good construct validity. All values for reliability were >0.70. This study was noteworthy in that it employed the design-thinking method to reflect learners' opinions in developing a peer evaluation instrument. Moreover, the study demonstrated adequate evidence of reliability and validity. Consequently, the developed Scale can be effectively applied to team-based learning assessments for nursing students.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lalala完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
康康小白杨完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
香风智乃完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
慕青应助生动的冷玉采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
LLL发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
langzfs完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
赵俊翔完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI6应助俊秀的谷云采纳,获得10
10秒前
王婷完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
西瓜完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
吴彦祖应助otkur采纳,获得10
12秒前
情怀应助真不错采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
直率孤风发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
agf发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
zzyyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
Ashley发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
激动的55完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
21秒前
和谐以冬完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
想想发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
25秒前
真不错发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
sunhhhh完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
慕青应助微笑的傲旋采纳,获得10
27秒前
木风2023完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
28秒前
狂野雅彤发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
真不错完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
复杂系统建模与弹性模型研究 2000
Iron toxicity and hematopoietic cell transplantation: do we understand why iron affects transplant outcome? 2000
Teacher Wellbeing: Noticing, Nurturing, Sustaining, and Flourishing in Schools 1200
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1021
睡眠呼吸障碍治疗学 600
Input 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5488216
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4587188
关于积分的说明 14412948
捐赠科研通 4518460
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2475790
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1461373
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1434279