Using the design-thinking method to develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning (PES-TBL) for nursing students

克朗巴赫阿尔法 结构效度 心理学 验证性因素分析 比例(比率) 同行评估 探索性因素分析 构造(python库) 判别效度 可靠性(半导体) 内容有效性 有效性 应用心理学 医学教育 数学教育 计算机科学 结构方程建模 心理测量学 医学 临床心理学 物理 功率(物理) 机器学习 程序设计语言 量子力学 内部一致性
作者
Young-Ran Kweon,Jungrim Park
出处
期刊:Nurse Education Today [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:127: 105849-105849 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105849
摘要

Peer evaluation in team-based learning provides meaningful information about the learning process and dynamics. Despite the importance of peer evaluation in learner-centred learning, there is a lack of valid and reliable scales that reflect students' experiences in the classroom. To develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. A cross-sectional methodological study. Four universities located in Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Eight nursing students exposed to team-based learning voluntarily participated in a design-thinking project, and eight nursing professors were selected for content validity. For the validation of the Scale, 722 nursing students were randomly selected. The design-thinking method was implemented to develop the Scale, and a questionnaire was used to assess the Scale's construct validity and reliability. The construct validity was examined in a split-half analysis with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and composite reliability were investigated for the peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. A 12-item tool, with each item using a 5-point scale for peer evaluation, was developed through the empathise, define, ideate, prototype, and test stages of the design-thinking method. Exploratory factor analysis identified three factors from the 12 items: responsibility, initiative, and collaboration. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the tool had acceptable convergent and discriminant validity, thus confirming good construct validity. All values for reliability were >0.70. This study was noteworthy in that it employed the design-thinking method to reflect learners' opinions in developing a peer evaluation instrument. Moreover, the study demonstrated adequate evidence of reliability and validity. Consequently, the developed Scale can be effectively applied to team-based learning assessments for nursing students.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
蔺不平发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
安详的白云完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
xt完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
上官若男应助感动背包采纳,获得10
8秒前
11秒前
Re发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
白笑石发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
melody发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
烟花应助FFFFF采纳,获得10
16秒前
星辰大海应助甜甜小蘑菇采纳,获得10
16秒前
18秒前
往返发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
平常的仙人掌完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
Re完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
脆弱大拇哥完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
23秒前
铁观音发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
陶征应助淡淡的元灵采纳,获得10
26秒前
27秒前
沉默的皮卡丘完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
orixero应助脆弱大拇哥采纳,获得10
29秒前
sdniuidifod发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
科研通AI2S应助椒盐鲨鱼皮采纳,获得10
33秒前
CAOHOU应助veronicaaaa采纳,获得10
34秒前
35秒前
36秒前
今后应助杜熙凤采纳,获得10
39秒前
FFFFF发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
搜集达人应助hhh采纳,获得10
42秒前
42秒前
白笑石完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
迷路博完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
高分求助中
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 1000
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 310
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3979693
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3523666
关于积分的说明 11218291
捐赠科研通 3261174
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1800485
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 879103
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 807167