Using the design-thinking method to develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning (PES-TBL) for nursing students

克朗巴赫阿尔法 结构效度 心理学 验证性因素分析 比例(比率) 同行评估 探索性因素分析 构造(python库) 判别效度 可靠性(半导体) 内容有效性 有效性 应用心理学 医学教育 数学教育 计算机科学 结构方程建模 心理测量学 医学 临床心理学 物理 功率(物理) 机器学习 程序设计语言 量子力学 内部一致性
作者
Young-Ran Kweon,Jungrim Park
出处
期刊:Nurse Education Today [Elsevier]
卷期号:127: 105849-105849 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105849
摘要

Peer evaluation in team-based learning provides meaningful information about the learning process and dynamics. Despite the importance of peer evaluation in learner-centred learning, there is a lack of valid and reliable scales that reflect students' experiences in the classroom. To develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. A cross-sectional methodological study. Four universities located in Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Eight nursing students exposed to team-based learning voluntarily participated in a design-thinking project, and eight nursing professors were selected for content validity. For the validation of the Scale, 722 nursing students were randomly selected. The design-thinking method was implemented to develop the Scale, and a questionnaire was used to assess the Scale's construct validity and reliability. The construct validity was examined in a split-half analysis with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and composite reliability were investigated for the peer evaluation scale for team-based learning. A 12-item tool, with each item using a 5-point scale for peer evaluation, was developed through the empathise, define, ideate, prototype, and test stages of the design-thinking method. Exploratory factor analysis identified three factors from the 12 items: responsibility, initiative, and collaboration. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the tool had acceptable convergent and discriminant validity, thus confirming good construct validity. All values for reliability were >0.70. This study was noteworthy in that it employed the design-thinking method to reflect learners' opinions in developing a peer evaluation instrument. Moreover, the study demonstrated adequate evidence of reliability and validity. Consequently, the developed Scale can be effectively applied to team-based learning assessments for nursing students.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
aku30完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
xiaodusb完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
稳重的蛟凤应助gougou采纳,获得10
2秒前
少盐完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
6秒前
jian94完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
咩咩发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Tin完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
单小芫完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
逍遥子完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
GHL完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
魁梧的海秋完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
JamesPei应助spinon采纳,获得10
12秒前
深情的楷瑞完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
南攻完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
Wsyyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
万能图书馆应助蔷薇采纳,获得20
16秒前
锂离子完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
忐忑的草丛完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
鱼贝贝完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
sss完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
尤瑟夫完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
赖氨酸完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
23秒前
星辰发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
gougou发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
28秒前
28秒前
科研韭菜完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
桥豆麻袋完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
桃子完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
spinon发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5715621
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5235764
关于积分的说明 15274658
捐赠科研通 4866353
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2612926
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1563081
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1520565