亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Criteria to evaluate efficacy of biologics in asthma: a Global Asthma Association survey

医学 哮喘 德尔菲法 家庭医学 物理疗法 内科学 统计 数学
作者
Angélica Tiotiu,András Bikov,Francisco Javier González‐Barcala,Silviya Novakova,Plamena Novakova,Herberto José Chong‐Neto,Pierachille Santus,Ignacio J. Ansotegui,Juan Carlos Ivancevich,Krzysztof Kowal,Ștefan Mihăicuță,Denislava Nedeva,Gorgio Walter Canonica,Jonathan A. Bernstein,Louis Philippe Boulet,Fulvio Braido
出处
期刊:Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine [Informa]
卷期号:17 (6): 507-516 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1080/17476348.2023.2223986
摘要

Background Currently, there are no universally accepted criteria to measure the response to biologics available as treatment for severe asthma. This survey aims to establish consensus criteria to use for the evaluation of response to biologics after 4 months of treatment.Method Using Delphi methodology, a questionnaire including 10 items was validated by 13 international experts in asthma. The electronic survey circulated within the Interasma Scientific Network platform. For each item, five answers were proposed graduated from 'no importance' to 'very high importance' and by a score (A = 2 points; B = 4 points; C = 6 points; D = 8 points; E = 10 points). The final criteria were selected if the median score for the item was ≥7 and > 60% of responses according 'high importance' and 'very high importance'. All selected criteria were validated by the experts.Results Four criteria were identified: reduce daily systemic corticosteroids dose by ≥50%; decrease the number of asthma exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids by ≥50%; have no/minimal side effects; and obtain asthma control according validated questionnaires. The consensual decision was that ≥3 criteria define a good response to biologics.Conclusions Specific criteria were defined by an international panel of experts and could be used as tool in clinical practice.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
oscar完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
彩色冥幽完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
17秒前
Juvianne完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
NexusExplorer应助Imstemcell采纳,获得10
22秒前
sci2025opt完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
西米发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
44秒前
Akim应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
47秒前
我是老大应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
47秒前
47秒前
47秒前
50秒前
顾矜应助annis采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
MchemG应助kento采纳,获得50
1分钟前
1分钟前
美罗培南完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
Imstemcell发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
科研小菜狗完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
吃了吃了完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Akim应助bearhong采纳,获得20
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
Criminology34举报可爱如音求助涉嫌违规
1分钟前
kento完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
annis发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
MEDwhy发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
bearhong发布了新的文献求助20
1分钟前
我是老大应助西米采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
菠萝包完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.).. Frederic G. Reamer 1070
2025-2031年中国兽用抗生素行业发展深度调研与未来趋势报告 1000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 851
The International Law of the Sea (fourth edition) 800
Introduction to Early Childhood Education 500
A Guide to Genetic Counseling, 3rd Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5418250
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4533960
关于积分的说明 14142924
捐赠科研通 4450231
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2441133
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1432869
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1410170