Blastocyst morphology is associated with the incidence of monozygotic twinning in assisted reproductive technology

胚泡 胚泡移植 内细胞团 单卵双胞胎 医学 一致性 产科 男科 怀孕 晶体孪晶 妇科 生物 胚胎 内科学 遗传学 胚胎发生 化学 微观结构 结晶学
作者
Wenhao Shi,Lei Jin,Jia Li,Cuilian Zhang,Yang Mi,Juanzi Shi,Hui Wang,Xiaoyan Liang
出处
期刊:American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [Elsevier]
卷期号:225 (6): 654.e1-654.e16 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.101
摘要

Background An increased incidence of monozygotic twinning after a blastocyst transfer has been previously reported in assisted reproductive technology treatment. It is uncertain whether this phenomenon is due to the extended culture time, culture medium, or inherent blastocyst parameters. Objective This study aimed to investigate the association between blastocyst parameters (in vitro culture time, blastocyst stage, and inner cell mass and trophectoderm grading) and the incidence of monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive technology. Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study employing data from a multicenter, large, electronic database from 4 academic hospitals. All clinical pregnancies after a single blastocyst transfer between January 2014 and February 2020 were included. Blastocyst morphology was evaluated based on the Gardner grading system, considering the blastocyst stage, and inner cell mass and trophectoderm grading (grades A, B, and C). Monozygotic twinning was defined as ≥2 fetal heartbeats in a single gestational sac or 2 gestational sacs with sex concordance at birth. The multivariable predicted marginal proportions from logistic regression models were used to compute adjusted relative risks for the association between blastocyst parameters and the incidence of monozygotic twinning. Results The overall monozygotic twinning rate was 1.53% (402 of 26,254 cases). The monozygotic twinning was not associated with the culture time in vitro (day 5 vs day 6) or blastocyst stage (early, blastocyst, expanded, hatching, and hatched). Alternatively, monozygotic twinning was associated with lower inner cell mass grading (B vs A: adjusted relative risk, 1.67 [95 % confidence interval, 1.28–2.25]; C vs A: adjusted relative risk, 1.98 [95% confidence interval, 1.18–3.11]) and higher trophectoderm grading (B vs C: adjusted relative risk, 1.38 [95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.92]; A vs C: adjusted relative risk, 2.14 [95% confidence interval, 1.45–3.20]). The incidence of monozygotic twinning was the lowest in blastocysts with grade A inner cell mass and grade B or C trophectoderm (0.82%, as the reference) and the highest in blastocysts with grade B or C inner cell mass and grade A trophectoderm (2.40%; adjusted relative risk, 2.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.60–4.43). The incidence of monozygotic twinning in blastocysts with consistent inner cell mass or trophectoderm grading was somewhere in between (both A: 1.58%; adjusted relative risk, 1.86 [95% confidence interval, 1.23–3.04]; both B or C: 1.59%; adjusted relative risk, 1.84 [95% confidence interval, 1.29–2.90]). Conclusion Higher risk of monozygotic twinning was associated with blastocyst morphology specific to those blastocysts with loosely arranged inner cell mass cells combined with tightly packed trophectoderm cells. An increased incidence of monozygotic twinning after a blastocyst transfer has been previously reported in assisted reproductive technology treatment. It is uncertain whether this phenomenon is due to the extended culture time, culture medium, or inherent blastocyst parameters. This study aimed to investigate the association between blastocyst parameters (in vitro culture time, blastocyst stage, and inner cell mass and trophectoderm grading) and the incidence of monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive technology. This was a retrospective cohort study employing data from a multicenter, large, electronic database from 4 academic hospitals. All clinical pregnancies after a single blastocyst transfer between January 2014 and February 2020 were included. Blastocyst morphology was evaluated based on the Gardner grading system, considering the blastocyst stage, and inner cell mass and trophectoderm grading (grades A, B, and C). Monozygotic twinning was defined as ≥2 fetal heartbeats in a single gestational sac or 2 gestational sacs with sex concordance at birth. The multivariable predicted marginal proportions from logistic regression models were used to compute adjusted relative risks for the association between blastocyst parameters and the incidence of monozygotic twinning. The overall monozygotic twinning rate was 1.53% (402 of 26,254 cases). The monozygotic twinning was not associated with the culture time in vitro (day 5 vs day 6) or blastocyst stage (early, blastocyst, expanded, hatching, and hatched). Alternatively, monozygotic twinning was associated with lower inner cell mass grading (B vs A: adjusted relative risk, 1.67 [95 % confidence interval, 1.28–2.25]; C vs A: adjusted relative risk, 1.98 [95% confidence interval, 1.18–3.11]) and higher trophectoderm grading (B vs C: adjusted relative risk, 1.38 [95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.92]; A vs C: adjusted relative risk, 2.14 [95% confidence interval, 1.45–3.20]). The incidence of monozygotic twinning was the lowest in blastocysts with grade A inner cell mass and grade B or C trophectoderm (0.82%, as the reference) and the highest in blastocysts with grade B or C inner cell mass and grade A trophectoderm (2.40%; adjusted relative risk, 2.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.60–4.43). The incidence of monozygotic twinning in blastocysts with consistent inner cell mass or trophectoderm grading was somewhere in between (both A: 1.58%; adjusted relative risk, 1.86 [95% confidence interval, 1.23–3.04]; both B or C: 1.59%; adjusted relative risk, 1.84 [95% confidence interval, 1.29–2.90]). Higher risk of monozygotic twinning was associated with blastocyst morphology specific to those blastocysts with loosely arranged inner cell mass cells combined with tightly packed trophectoderm cells.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
学术巨婴完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
任梓宁完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
K13完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
韬奋!完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
任梓宁发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
醉熏的以云完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
深情安青应助李明采纳,获得10
9秒前
圣人海完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
李健应助思辰。采纳,获得10
11秒前
北风完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
英姑应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
卫绯完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
12秒前
Jasper应助老迟到的幻露采纳,获得10
12秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
12秒前
12秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
语安完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
壮观若南完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
bkagyin应助恒恒爱吃鱼采纳,获得10
19秒前
海昌完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
狄淇儿完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
李明完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
ntrip完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
醋溜爆肚儿完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
安澜完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
不知完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
友好的未来完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
HTY完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
小草三心完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
chcmuer完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
积极思松发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
月亮完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
Young完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
jphu完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 888
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
XAFS for Everyone 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3137115
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2788096
关于积分的说明 7784635
捐赠科研通 2444121
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1299763
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 625574
版权声明 601011