Quality of care experience in aged care: An Australia-Wide discrete choice experiment to elicit preference weights

质量(理念) 尊严 偏爱 人口 任务(项目管理) 医学 医疗保健 比例(比率) 家庭医学 心理学 老年学 环境卫生 统计 地理 数学 哲学 管理 认识论 地图学 政治学 法学 经济 经济增长
作者
Gang Chen,Julie Ratcliffe,Rachel Milte,Jyoti Khadka,Billingsley Kaambwa
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier]
卷期号:289: 114440-114440 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114440
摘要

The quality of aged care provided to older people is a concern for all countries globally. This study adopts a novel first-stage discrete choice experiment (DCE) and a second-stage quality rating task to empirically estimate the relative importance of six key aged care quality criteria from more than 10,000 Australian general population sample. The six attributes or characteristics (each with five levels) compose the new measure, Quality of Care Experience (QCE) in aged care that includes: 'Respect & Dignity', 'Make Own Decisions', 'Skills & Training (of staff)', 'Health & Wellbeing', 'Social Relationships', and 'Lodging Complaints'. The online survey was conducted between September and October 2019. Preference heterogeneity was evident among respondents. The latent class analysis indicates that those more experienced respondents (i.e. have a better knowledge of Australia's current aged care system or they had a close family member who was receiving aged care services) valued more towards the outcomes of the aged care services whilst the inexperienced respondents valued highly towards the process of the aged care services. A preference weighted scoring algorithm was developed for the QCE measure (on a 0–1 scale whereby 0 = lowest quality and 1 = highest quality) and the corresponding quality thresholds for 'Unacceptable/Poor', 'Satisfactory' and 'High/Very High' quality of care were reported based on the second-stage quality rating questions following each DCE task. The impact of different QCE attributes on the quality ratings was non-linear when considering movements from 'Unacceptable/Poor' to 'Satisfactory', and from 'Satisfactory' to 'High/Very High'. This study provides important insights into the general public's perceptions of the relative importance of key quality of care experience criteria in aged care.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Ares完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
浮游应助imi采纳,获得10
1秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
Greg应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
所所应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
ding应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
张庭豪完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
5秒前
sdjjis完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
Snail6完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
研友_LX7zK8完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
简奥斯汀完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
wxp5294完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
寒冷丹雪完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
缺缺完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
牛仔完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
时有落花至完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
可靠的千凝完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
清爽朋友完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
QQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
化简为繁完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
金桔希子完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
15秒前
青青完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
小蘑菇噢噢噢完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
wd完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
成就的白羊完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
蛋花肉圆汤完成签到,获得积分0
17秒前
书记完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Digitizing Enlightenment: Digital Humanities and the Transformation of Eighteenth-Century Studies 1000
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
Real World Research, 5th Edition 680
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 660
Handbook of Migration, International Relations and Security in Asia 555
Between high and low : a chronology of the early Hellenistic period 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5671607
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4920377
关于积分的说明 15135208
捐赠科研通 4830460
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2587117
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1540692
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1499071