Percutaneous coronary interventional strategies for treatment of in-stent restenosis: a network meta-analysis

医学 传统PCI 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 再狭窄 支架 血管成形术 裸金属支架 随机对照试验 内科学 心脏病学 药物洗脱支架 外科 放射科 心肌梗塞
作者
George C.M. Siontis,Giulio G. Stefanini,Dimitris Mavridis,Konstantinos C. Siontis,Fernándo Alfonso,Marı́a José Pérez-Vizcayno,Robert A. Byrne,Adnan Kastrati,Bernhard Meier,Georgia Salanti,Peter Jüni,Stephan Windecker
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:386 (9994): 655-664 被引量:297
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60657-2
摘要

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents is the standard of care for treatment of native coronary artery stenoses, but optimum treatment strategies for bare metal stent and drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (ISR) have not been established. We aimed to compare and rank percutaneous treatment strategies for ISR.We did a network meta-analysis to synthesise both direct and indirect evidence from relevant trials. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase for randomised controlled trials published up to Oct 31, 2014, of different PCI strategies for treatment of any type of coronary ISR. The primary outcome was percent diameter stenosis at angiographic follow-up. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42014014191.We deemed 27 trials eligible, including 5923 patients, with follow-up ranging from 6 months to 60 months after the index intervention. Angiographic follow-up was available for 4975 (84%) of 5923 patients 6-12 months after the intervention. PCI with everolimus-eluting stents was the most effective treatment for percent diameter stenosis, with a difference of -9·0% (95% CI -15·8 to -2·2) versus drug-coated balloons (DCB), -9·4% (-17·4 to -1·4) versus sirolimus-eluting stents, -10·2% (-18·4 to -2·0) versus paclitaxel-eluting stents, -19·2% (-28·2 to -10·4) versus vascular brachytherapy, -23·4% (-36·2 to -10·8) versus bare metal stents, -24·2% (-32·2 to -16·4) versus balloon angioplasty, and -31·8% (-44·8 to -18·6) versus rotablation. DCB were ranked as the second most effective treatment, but without significant differences from sirolimus-eluting (-0·2% [95% CI -6·2 to 5·6]) or paclitaxel-eluting (-1·2% [-6·4 to 4·2]) stents.These findings suggest that two strategies should be considered for treatment of any type of coronary ISR: PCI with everolimus-eluting stents because of the best angiographic and clinical outcomes, and DCB because of its ability to provide favourable results without adding a new stent layer.None.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
FashionBoy应助薯饼薯饼薯采纳,获得10
1秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
核桃应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
1秒前
陈陈陈完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
天天快乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1秒前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
GPTea应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
1秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
soilman应助Wan采纳,获得10
3秒前
012完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
花傲天的小狗完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
江梦槐发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
huang应助ping采纳,获得20
5秒前
hello完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
zx应助透明人采纳,获得10
6秒前
科研通AI6.4应助透明人采纳,获得10
6秒前
garyluo完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
luckywwww发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
SciGPT应助苏苏采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
肖旻发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Akim应助顺其自然采纳,获得10
8秒前
华仔应助012采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Geist der Kunst und Kultur 1000
Resistance Spot Welding Dataset for Automobile Body-in-White Quality Analysis 748
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Child and Adolescent Psychology 600
Machine Learning for Asset Management and Pricing 600
Numerical analysis of the coupled atmosphere-ocean models (CAO II). II 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7412864
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9016522
关于积分的说明 19206595
捐赠科研通 7044702
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3233716
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2395929
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2215728