Percutaneous coronary interventional strategies for treatment of in-stent restenosis: a network meta-analysis

医学 传统PCI 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 再狭窄 支架 血管成形术 裸金属支架 随机对照试验 内科学 心脏病学 药物洗脱支架 外科 放射科 心肌梗塞
作者
George C.M. Siontis,Giulio G. Stefanini,Dimitris Mavridis,Konstantinos C. Siontis,Fernándo Alfonso,Marı́a José Pérez-Vizcayno,Robert A. Byrne,Adnan Kastrati,Bernhard Meier,Georgia Salanti,Peter Jüni,Stephan Windecker
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:386 (9994): 655-664 被引量:297
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60657-2
摘要

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents is the standard of care for treatment of native coronary artery stenoses, but optimum treatment strategies for bare metal stent and drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (ISR) have not been established. We aimed to compare and rank percutaneous treatment strategies for ISR.We did a network meta-analysis to synthesise both direct and indirect evidence from relevant trials. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase for randomised controlled trials published up to Oct 31, 2014, of different PCI strategies for treatment of any type of coronary ISR. The primary outcome was percent diameter stenosis at angiographic follow-up. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42014014191.We deemed 27 trials eligible, including 5923 patients, with follow-up ranging from 6 months to 60 months after the index intervention. Angiographic follow-up was available for 4975 (84%) of 5923 patients 6-12 months after the intervention. PCI with everolimus-eluting stents was the most effective treatment for percent diameter stenosis, with a difference of -9·0% (95% CI -15·8 to -2·2) versus drug-coated balloons (DCB), -9·4% (-17·4 to -1·4) versus sirolimus-eluting stents, -10·2% (-18·4 to -2·0) versus paclitaxel-eluting stents, -19·2% (-28·2 to -10·4) versus vascular brachytherapy, -23·4% (-36·2 to -10·8) versus bare metal stents, -24·2% (-32·2 to -16·4) versus balloon angioplasty, and -31·8% (-44·8 to -18·6) versus rotablation. DCB were ranked as the second most effective treatment, but without significant differences from sirolimus-eluting (-0·2% [95% CI -6·2 to 5·6]) or paclitaxel-eluting (-1·2% [-6·4 to 4·2]) stents.These findings suggest that two strategies should be considered for treatment of any type of coronary ISR: PCI with everolimus-eluting stents because of the best angiographic and clinical outcomes, and DCB because of its ability to provide favourable results without adding a new stent layer.None.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
顾矜应助小雨采纳,获得10
刚刚
寻找论文的研究生a完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
11完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
顾矜应助何思源采纳,获得10
3秒前
moses发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
赘婿应助Yi采纳,获得10
4秒前
义气严青完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
你好发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
lcj1014发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
Jeffreyzhong完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Nole应助大喜采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
fruchtjelly发布了新的文献求助40
7秒前
山楂罐头冰冰凉完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
悦耳的真完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
MozzieMiao发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
丘比特应助粗犷的毛衣采纳,获得10
9秒前
领导范儿应助何土平采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
HappyR发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
饱满的凡儿完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
dde应助rio采纳,获得10
12秒前
852应助我们一起丢沙包采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
英姑应助nenoaowu采纳,获得30
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
核安全综合知识2024版 500
Photothermal Science and Techniques 500
Digital Displacement Hydrostatic Transmission for Rotorcraft and Distributed Propulsion 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7707899
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9265331
关于积分的说明 20054237
捐赠科研通 7284363
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3296190
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2451023
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2303153