亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Late effects toxicity scoring: the SOMA scale

索马 毒性 比例(比率) 医学 内科学 生物 神经科学 地理 地图学
作者
JJ Pavy,J. Denekamp,J.G.J. Letschert,Bo Littbrand,F. Mornex,Jacques Bernier,D. Gonzales-Gonzales,Jean-Claude Horiot,Michel Bolla,Harry Bartelink
出处
期刊:Radiotherapy and Oncology [Elsevier]
卷期号:35 (1): 11-15 被引量:291
标识
DOI:10.1016/0167-8140(95)97448-m
摘要

The two large organizations that initiate and coordinate multicenter clinical trials in Europe and in North America, the EORTC and the RTOG, have recently formed specific subcommittees or working groups to update their systems for assessing the late injury to normal tissues. This is regarded as necessary in order to standardize and improve the recording so that there can be uniform reporting of toxicity, at agreed and regular intervals in different clinical studies. Many centres have devised their own scales for recording such injury, some of which record all the raw data as it is derived from the patient, while others give a single score on a scale of l-5 to indicate the severity of the overall response. With such a variability in detailed recording of the information on morbidity it is difficult, or even impossible, to compare the outcome of different clinical studies, separated either geographically or chronologically, and indeed there is even a risk of drift within a study in the long period from initiation through to its completion, In the European cooperative studies there is the further need to ensure that the recording of data is uniform against a background of many different languages being used in the consultation between the doctor and the patient By autumn 1993, the EORTC and RTOG working groups had each reached a quite advanced stage in their own organizations towards rationalizing the scoring of late injury. It was then recognized that there would be a great advantage if these two organizations could agree on a common scale, to enable direct comparison of the benefits emerging from the different therapeutic approaches that are being investigated by them.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Ava应助哈比人linling采纳,获得10
刚刚
桔子发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
领导范儿应助霸气乐菱采纳,获得10
13秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助wwf采纳,获得10
17秒前
19秒前
21秒前
Ariel完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
11111发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
Kathy完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
31秒前
kong完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
32秒前
36秒前
38秒前
38秒前
CodeCraft应助zzzz采纳,获得10
40秒前
H4ppy_n3w_y34r完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
41秒前
Ghiocel完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
44秒前
llpj完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
45秒前
47秒前
48秒前
自信寻真发布了新的文献求助20
48秒前
甜蜜舞蹈完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
zzzz发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
蛋仔发布了新的文献求助30
55秒前
wwf发布了新的文献求助10
55秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
59秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
59秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
59秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
59秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
59秒前
59秒前
59秒前
lin完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
wwf完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5714225
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5221821
关于积分的说明 15272955
捐赠科研通 4865714
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2612313
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1562449
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1519671