髓系白血病
融合蛋白
融合转录本
断点群集区域
阿布勒
癌症研究
医学
伊马替尼
费城染色体
融合基因
融合
免疫学
肿瘤科
内科学
生物
染色体易位
酪氨酸激酶
遗传学
重组DNA
受体
基因
哲学
语言学
作者
Arun Kumar Arunachalam,A. Senthamizhselvi,Sathya Mani,K. Vinodhini,Nancy Beryl Janet,Kavitha M. Lakshmi,Ajay Abraham,Biju George,Alok Srivastava,Viranjay M. Srivastava,Vikram Mathews,Poonkuzhali Balasubramanian
摘要
Summary Introduction The hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia ( CML ) is the presence of Philadelphia chromosome, its resultant fusion transcript ( BCR ‐ ABL 1 ), and fusion protein (p210). Alternate breakpoints in BCR (m‐bcr, μ‐bcr, and others) or ABL 1 result in the expression of few rare fusion transcripts (e19a2, e1a2, e13a3, e14a3) and fusion proteins (p190, p200, p225) whose exact clinical significance remains to be determined. Methods Our study was designed to determine the type and frequency of BCR ‐ ABL 1 fusion transcripts in 1260 CML patients and to analyze the prognosis and treatment response in patients harboring rare BCR ‐ ABL 1 fusion transcripts. Results The frequency of various BCR ‐ ABL 1 fusion transcripts was as follows: e14a2 (60%), e13a2 (34.3%), e1a2 (1.2%), e1a2 + e13a2 (2.0%), e1a2 + e14a2 (1.8%), e19a2 (0.3%), and e14a3 (0.3%). CML patients with e1a2 transcripts had higher rates of disease progression, resistance, or suboptimal response to imatinib and failed to achieve major molecular response. Conclusion Characterization of the specific fusion transcript in CML patients is important owing to the difference in prognosis and response to therapy in addition to the conventional need for monitoring treatment response. CML patients with e1a2 transcripts have to be closely monitored due to the high incidence of disease progression and treatment resistance/failure.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI