Ethics in nursing: A systematic review of the framework of evidence perspective

奇纳 护理伦理学 护理部 心理信息 系统回顾 包裹体(矿物) 梅德林 能力(人力资源) 医学 护理研究 护士教育 职业道德 工程伦理学 心理学 心理干预 社会心理学 政治学 法学 工程类 精神科
作者
Erman Yıldız
出处
期刊:Nursing Ethics [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:26 (4): 1128-1148 被引量:29
标识
DOI:10.1177/0969733017734412
摘要

Aim: To determine the current state of knowledge on nursing and ethics and to assess the knowledge and experience based on the evidence in this regard. Background: Although ethics is at the center of the nursing profession and the ethical issues affecting nurses are given much importance, few studies have focused on professional ethics in nursing. In this respect, ethics has become a concept that contains controversial and ambiguous situations. Design: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guide, a basic search algorithm, was taken. Data sources: Cochrane, PubMed, CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, and ULAKBIM from 2012 to 2016. Review methods: Following a systematic search strategy, all papers were assessed in relation to inclusion criteria and type of study. When sufficient information was not available in the title and summary of the works, the necessary data were evaluated in full texts. Results: This review was completed with 27 articles meeting the research criteria. The evaluation identified six themes: (1) ethics and nursing, (2) ethical difficulties/ethical dilemmas and nursing, (3) ethical competence and nursing, (4) professional ethics and nursing, (5) ethics, education, and nursing, and (6) ethics in health research. Conclusion: As a result of the review, a synthesis of high evidence-level research relating to nursing ethics was obtained. The emphasis was on the importance of further research and education so that the ethical aspects of nursing can be better understood throughout the studies. Nursing researchers’ level of evidence on ethics and their orientation to high research design will shed light on uncertain and controversial aspects of the subject. Ethical consideration: Since this was a systematic review, no ethical approval was required. There is no conflict of interest in this literature review.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
Cactus应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
打打应助安晓麒采纳,获得10
4秒前
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
蓝莲花完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
小西米发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
大模型应助黄石采纳,获得10
9秒前
亚亚吖发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
12秒前
wxy发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
chengran完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
华仔应助Jy采纳,获得10
15秒前
浅浅完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
orixero应助囙氼仚采纳,获得10
16秒前
Crystal发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
翁若翠发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
小兰花发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
加一完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
27秒前
优美匕发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
囙氼仚发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
28秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
dai完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
Lze发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
大大大猛羊完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
32秒前
Jy发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
An experimental and analytical investigation on the fatigue behaviour of fuselage riveted lap joints: The significance of the rivet squeeze force, and a comparison of 2024-T3 and Glare 3 1000
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, Global Edition, 6th edition 600
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
ALUMINUM STANDARDS AND DATA 500
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3664493
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3224499
关于积分的说明 9757818
捐赠科研通 2934401
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1606848
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 758873
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 735012