阿达帕林
耐受性
痤疮
医学
过氧化苯甲酰
皮肤病科
不利影响
联合疗法
固定剂量组合
随机对照试验
起效
内科学
聚合
有机化学
化学
聚合物
作者
Harald Gollnick,Zoe Diana Draelos,Martha Glenn,Les Rosoph,Andrzej Kaszuba,Raymond L. Cornelison,B Gore,Y Liu,Michael Graeber
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09209.x
摘要
Background Combination therapy utilizing agents with complementary mechanisms of action is recommended by acne guidelines to help simultaneously target multiple pathogenic factors. A unique, topical, fixed‐dose combination gel with adapalene 0·1% and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 2·5% has recently been developed for the once‐daily treatment of acne. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adapalene 0·1%–BPO 2·5% fixed‐dose combination gel (adapalene–BPO) relative to adapalene 0·1% monotherapy (adapalene), BPO 2·5% monotherapy (BPO), and the gel vehicle (vehicle) in a large population for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Methods In total, 1670 subjects were randomized in a double‐blind controlled trial to receive adapalene–BPO, adapalene, BPO or vehicle for 12 weeks (1 : 1 : 1 : 1 randomization). Evaluations included success rate (subjects ‘clear’ or ‘almost clear’), percentage change in lesion count from baseline, cutaneous tolerability and adverse events. Results Adapalene–BPO was significantly more effective than corresponding monotherapies, with significant differences in percentage lesion count change observed as early as 1 week. Cutaneous tolerability profile was similar to adapalene. Adverse events were more frequent with the combination therapy (mainly due to an increase in mild‐to‐moderate dry skin), occurred early in the study, and were transient. Conclusions Adapalene–BPO provides significantly greater and synergistic efficacy and a faster onset of action with an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of acne vulgaris when compared with the corresponding vehicle and the adapalene and BPO monotherapies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI