Cueing and Cognitive Conflict in Judge-Advisor Decision Making

心理学 任务(项目管理) 认知 社会心理学 过程(计算) 提示语 群体决策 认知心理学 管理 计算机科学 经济 神经科学 操作系统
作者
Janet A. Sniezek,Timothy Buckley
出处
期刊:Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:62 (2): 159-174 被引量:317
标识
DOI:10.1006/obhd.1995.1040
摘要

The Judge-Advisor paradigm (Sniezek & Buckley, 1989) allows for the study of decision making by groups with differentiated roles. This paper reports a study using this approach to investigate the impact of advice vis-à-vis the judge′s own initial choice. Teams consisting of one judge and two advisors (business students randomly assigned to these roles) were given a choice task (concerning business events) composed of 70 items with two alternatives each. The judges provided final team choices and confidence assessments under one of three conditions: Dependent (judge has no basis for own choice), Cued (judge chooses only after being advised), or Independent (judges makes own tentative choice prior to being advised as well as subsequent final choice). Results showed that this manipulation affected the judge′s final choice accuracy and confidence, leading to the best performance by Independent judges and the poorest by Dependent judges. These data are discussed with respect to theory and data on the cueing effect (Sniezek, Paese, & Switzer, 1990) for individual choice. In addition, the effects on the decision making process of the judge from (a) advisors′ confidence and (b) conflict between advisors′ recommendations are examined in detail. Finally, issues concerning the potential contribution of the Judge-Advisor paradigm to the understanding of social decision making are addressed.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
kingwill应助南韵采纳,获得20
1秒前
3秒前
Poik完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
刘娅铷发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
5秒前
小小吴完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
不孤独的发卡完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
潘善若发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
zzzjh完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
香蕉觅云应助超级采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
安然完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
桔子完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
落后的哈密瓜完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
潘善若发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
Rainbow完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
21秒前
SciGPT应助momo采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
Lili完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
23秒前
congyjs完成签到,获得积分20
25秒前
超级发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
26秒前
潘善若发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
Rondab应助胡图图采纳,获得10
27秒前
27秒前
29秒前
nilu完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
congyjs发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
31秒前
CodeCraft应助落后的哈密瓜采纳,获得10
31秒前
31秒前
王汉韬发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
Nature_Science完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
33秒前
lihan完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
34秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3989297
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3531418
关于积分的说明 11253893
捐赠科研通 3270097
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1804884
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882087
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809158