Interplay between a Heptamethine Cyanine Dye Sensitizer (IR806) and Lanthanide Upconversion Nanoparticles

Abstract Lanthanide‐doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) have attractive emission properties but suffer from weak light‐absorbing capacities and thereby relatively low brightnesses. This motivates using strongly absorbing dye molecules as antennas and sensitizers. However, despite much effort, understanding of this dye‐UCNP interplay is still limited. Major sensitization mechanisms are still under discussion, largely because there is a lack of effective means to observe key factors such as dark state transitions within the dyes. Here, a combined spectroscopic procedure is established to systematically investigate the photophysics behind the dye‐UCNP interaction, embracing fluorescence‐based transient‐state excitation‐modulation, lifetime and correlation spectroscopy, and spectrofluorometry/spectrophotometry. With this procedure the heptamethine cyanine dye IR806, a typical UCNP sensitizer is studied, its photophysical model is established, its photophysics in UCL‐sensitization‐related environments is deciphered, and the energy transfer from the IR806 singlet excited state to Yb 3+ (UCNP sensitizer ion) can be identified as the dominant sensitization mechanism. These studies suggest that IR806 can form non‐emissive H‐aggregates at the nanoparticle surfaces, which can be dissociated after certain light excitation duration (typically>100 µs). Moreover, buildup of a non‐fluorescent, photo‐redox state of IR806 after longer irradiation times (10–100 ms) can deleteriously affect its UCL sensitization effect, inferring an optimal excitation duration for dye‐sensitized UCNPs, relevant for, e.g., optical imaging applications.