Post-implant transcatheter aortic prosthesis deformation: tricuspid versus bicuspid valve

Abstract Objective We sought to assess whether post-implant transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis multi detector computed characteristics differ between patients with native tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valve stenosis, as well as the effect on valve performance and clinical implications. Methods We analysed 100 consecutive post-implant multi detector computed tomography scans to assess self-expandable prosthesis non-uniform expansion at six pre-specified valvular levels, and other specific parameters, including valvular and perivalvular thrombosis at six months follow-up. Echocardiographic prosthesis performance and clinical outcome was also evaluated. Results Mean eccentricity was significantly higher in the bicuspid group (0.43 (0.09) vs 0.37 (0.08), p = 0.005, bicuspid vs tricuspid); valvular and perivalvular thrombosis were also significantly more frequent in the bicuspid than in the tricuspid group (81% vs. 36.9%, p = 0.031); there was no significant difference in terms of mean prosthetic gradient at follow-up between (7.31 (5.53 mmHg) vs 7.09 (3.05 mmHg), p = 0.825); EOAi was also similar between bicuspid and tricuspid (1.08 (0.12 cm2) vs 1.03 (0.13 cm2), p = 0.101), with no significant changes compared to discharge. However, the bicuspid valve was associated with a significantly higher risk of adverse events (HR:3.72, 95%CI: 1.07-13.4, p = 0.027). Conclusions Higher level of eccentricity, which indicates prosthesis deformation, is often detected in bicuspid valves. Although echocardiographic performance was not affected, this might have led to an increased incidence of thrombosis at valvular and perivalvular levels and worse outcomes.