Comparison Between Eccentric vs. Concentric Muscle Actions On Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

古怪的 科克伦图书馆 荟萃分析 子群分析 肌肉肥大 等长运动 随机对照试验 科学网 医学 内科学 心脏病学 量子力学 物理
作者
Leonardo Santos Lopes da Silva,Leonardo da Silva Gonçalves,Pedro Henrique Alves Campos,Cicero Jonas R. Benjamim,Márcio Fernando Tasinafo Júnior,Leonardo Coelho Rabello de Lima,Carlos Roberto Bueno Júnior,Charles Phillipe de Lucena Alves
出处
期刊:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:39 (1): 115-134 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004981
摘要

ABSTRACT: da Silva, LSL, Gonçalves, LdS, Alves Campos, PH, Benjamim, CJR, Tasinafo Júnior, MF, de Lima, LCR, Bueno Júnior, CR, and Alves, CPdL. Comparison between eccentric vs. concentric muscle actions on hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): 115-134, 2025-Different physiological mechanisms of sarcomere activity during eccentric (ECC) and concentric (CON) muscle actions led to investigations into muscle hypertrophy outcomes, but conclusions remain elusive. We aimed to investigate the effects of ECC vs. CON muscle actions on muscle hypertrophy in apparently healthy adults through a systematic review with meta-analysis. The searches were conducted on EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to: (a) be randomized/controlled trials; (b) investigate the effects of CON vs. ECC resistance training programs in apparently healthy adults; (c) assess hypertrophy outcomes using direct imaging for cross-sectional area, muscle thickness, or muscle volume. A total of 15,778 studies were identified, and 26 (682 subjects included in the meta-analysis) met the inclusion criteria. The main findings indicated no statistical difference between ECC vs. CON on hypertrophy measurements (0.285 [95% CI: -0.131 to 0.701]; p = 0.179; I2: 84.4%; GRADE: very low). Subgroup meta-analysis analyzing possible hypertrophy outcome moderators as age (18-59 years old and ≥60 years old) and weeks of intervention duration (>8 weeks) did not reveal differences between ECC vs. CON. Subgroup analysis revealed an effect favoring the ECC for the upper limb muscles (p = 0.018), ≤8 weeks of intervention (p = 0.046), muscle thickness assessment (p = 0.0352), and isokinetic contraction (p = 0.0251). Our findings suggest similar hypertrophy between ECC and CON muscle actions in apparently healthy adults. However, it appears that the muscles of the upper limbs, shorter interventions, hypertrophy assessment method, and the contraction type may favor ECC muscle actions.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刹那mirai完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
KT完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
乐乐应助天才阿博采纳,获得10
1秒前
2170245404发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
方方应助晚晚采纳,获得10
3秒前
6秒前
清爽的诗槐完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
黑眼圈完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
烦恼大海发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
9秒前
小睿完成签到 ,获得积分20
9秒前
丘比特应助ALICEJACK采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
吕吕完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
不吃奶粉完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
每天每天完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
whj完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
2170245404完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
15秒前
火星上誉发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
xulaoshi完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
JamesPei应助zeng采纳,获得10
17秒前
high cold发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
逗号完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
gyf发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
无花果应助dawei采纳,获得10
18秒前
每天每天发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
2620完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
fff完成签到,获得积分0
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
404完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
HaoyuHu完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
汉堡包应助Catalysis123采纳,获得10
21秒前
爆米花应助小东西采纳,获得30
21秒前
高分求助中
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Psychology 600
Prompt Engineering for Clinicians: Harnessing AI in Everyday Medical Practice 600
Handbook of Luminescence Dating 500
Safety Pharmacology 500
《KNN基无铅压电陶瓷电学性能优化与物理机理研究》 500
Isomerism In Coordination Compounds 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6935297
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8622207
关于积分的说明 18287797
捐赠科研通 6362719
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3075248
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2112700
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2052680