Comparison Between Eccentric vs. Concentric Muscle Actions On Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

古怪的 科克伦图书馆 荟萃分析 子群分析 肌肉肥大 等长运动 随机对照试验 科学网 医学 内科学 心脏病学 量子力学 物理
作者
Leonardo Santos Lopes da Silva,Leonardo da Silva Gonçalves,Pedro Henrique Alves Campos,Cicero Jonas R. Benjamim,Márcio Fernando Tasinafo Júnior,Leonardo Coelho Rabello de Lima,Carlos Roberto Bueno Júnior,Charles Phillipe de Lucena Alves
出处
期刊:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:39 (1): 115-134 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004981
摘要

ABSTRACT: da Silva, LSL, Gonçalves, LdS, Alves Campos, PH, Benjamim, CJR, Tasinafo Júnior, MF, de Lima, LCR, Bueno Júnior, CR, and Alves, CPdL. Comparison between eccentric vs. concentric muscle actions on hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): 115-134, 2025-Different physiological mechanisms of sarcomere activity during eccentric (ECC) and concentric (CON) muscle actions led to investigations into muscle hypertrophy outcomes, but conclusions remain elusive. We aimed to investigate the effects of ECC vs. CON muscle actions on muscle hypertrophy in apparently healthy adults through a systematic review with meta-analysis. The searches were conducted on EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to: (a) be randomized/controlled trials; (b) investigate the effects of CON vs. ECC resistance training programs in apparently healthy adults; (c) assess hypertrophy outcomes using direct imaging for cross-sectional area, muscle thickness, or muscle volume. A total of 15,778 studies were identified, and 26 (682 subjects included in the meta-analysis) met the inclusion criteria. The main findings indicated no statistical difference between ECC vs. CON on hypertrophy measurements (0.285 [95% CI: -0.131 to 0.701]; p = 0.179; I2: 84.4%; GRADE: very low). Subgroup meta-analysis analyzing possible hypertrophy outcome moderators as age (18-59 years old and ≥60 years old) and weeks of intervention duration (>8 weeks) did not reveal differences between ECC vs. CON. Subgroup analysis revealed an effect favoring the ECC for the upper limb muscles (p = 0.018), ≤8 weeks of intervention (p = 0.046), muscle thickness assessment (p = 0.0352), and isokinetic contraction (p = 0.0251). Our findings suggest similar hypertrophy between ECC and CON muscle actions in apparently healthy adults. However, it appears that the muscles of the upper limbs, shorter interventions, hypertrophy assessment method, and the contraction type may favor ECC muscle actions.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
脑洞疼应助九七采纳,获得10
刚刚
JamesPei应助雪山大地采纳,获得30
1秒前
罐装小姜发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
fruchtjelly发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
NexusExplorer应助fenghuo采纳,获得10
2秒前
小二郎应助fenghuo采纳,获得10
2秒前
lelele发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
JamesPei应助fenghuo采纳,获得10
2秒前
脑洞疼应助fenghuo采纳,获得10
2秒前
华仔应助fenghuo采纳,获得10
2秒前
Hello应助fenghuo采纳,获得10
2秒前
Lucas应助fenghuo采纳,获得10
2秒前
orixero应助fenghuo采纳,获得10
2秒前
CodeCraft应助fenghuo采纳,获得10
2秒前
LYH发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
青菜完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
FashionBoy应助初夏采纳,获得10
3秒前
青松应助SenyngChen采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
曾哥帅完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
thchiang发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Shirley完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
十二应助青云采纳,获得20
8秒前
10秒前
林一发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
liuye0202发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
我是老大应助落寞绮南采纳,获得10
12秒前
fruchtjelly完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
汉堡包应助汤圆采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
上官若男应助哈虎和采纳,获得10
15秒前
畅快的饼干完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
爆米花应助人间月色采纳,获得10
17秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助锦七采纳,获得10
17秒前
地球翻转完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
CC发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 2500
Atlas of Aligner Treatment and Planning A Case-Based Approach 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Concise Introduction to Social Psychology 600
Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7438775
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9040072
关于积分的说明 19266275
捐赠科研通 7064567
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3237921
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2401302
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2221774