Comparison Between Eccentric vs. Concentric Muscle Actions On Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

同心的 古怪的 肌肉肥大 医学 内科学 物理医学与康复 解剖 数学 几何学 工程类 结构工程
作者
Leonardo Santos Lopes da Silva,Leonardo da Silva Gonçalves,Pedro Henrique Alves Campos,Cicero Jonas R. Benjamim,Márcio Fernando Tasinafo Júnior,Leonardo Coelho Rabello de Lima,Carlos Roberto Bueno Júnior,Charles Phillipe de Lucena Alves
出处
期刊:PubMed 卷期号:39 (1): 115-134
标识
DOI:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004981
摘要

da Silva, LSL, Gonçalves, LdS, Alves Campos, PH, Benjamim, CJR, Tasinafo Júnior, MF, de Lima, LCR, Bueno Júnior, CR, and Alves, CPdL. Comparison between eccentric vs. concentric muscle actions on hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): 115-134, 2025-Different physiological mechanisms of sarcomere activity during eccentric (ECC) and concentric (CON) muscle actions led to investigations into muscle hypertrophy outcomes, but conclusions remain elusive. We aimed to investigate the effects of ECC vs. CON muscle actions on muscle hypertrophy in apparently healthy adults through a systematic review with meta-analysis. The searches were conducted on EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to: (a) be randomized/controlled trials; (b) investigate the effects of CON vs. ECC resistance training programs in apparently healthy adults; (c) assess hypertrophy outcomes using direct imaging for cross-sectional area, muscle thickness, or muscle volume. A total of 15,778 studies were identified, and 26 (682 subjects included in the meta-analysis) met the inclusion criteria. The main findings indicated no statistical difference between ECC vs. CON on hypertrophy measurements (0.285 [95% CI: -0.131 to 0.701]; p = 0.179; I2: 84.4%; GRADE: very low). Subgroup meta-analysis analyzing possible hypertrophy outcome moderators as age (18-59 years old and ≥60 years old) and weeks of intervention duration (>8 weeks) did not reveal differences between ECC vs. CON. Subgroup analysis revealed an effect favoring the ECC for the upper limb muscles (p = 0.018), ≤8 weeks of intervention (p = 0.046), muscle thickness assessment (p = 0.0352), and isokinetic contraction (p = 0.0251). Our findings suggest similar hypertrophy between ECC and CON muscle actions in apparently healthy adults. However, it appears that the muscles of the upper limbs, shorter interventions, hypertrophy assessment method, and the contraction type may favor ECC muscle actions.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
QCB完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
中国人发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
zzz完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
明天见完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Serein完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
wang完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zzzzzzzzzj完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
研友完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
炙热的若枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
科研挂完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
123完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
junia完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
光电效应完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
懒猫完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
丽丽完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
liuyang1991完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
Li发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
冰美式好好喝呀完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
米大王发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
谭冬冬完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
中国人完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
wy.he完成签到,获得积分0
8秒前
9秒前
勤恳的素阴完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
HH完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
胖虎啊发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
科研达人发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
小龙发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
hotwater发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
今后应助Ash采纳,获得30
12秒前
12秒前
随遇而安发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
猫咪乖乖爱你完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes 2500
Modern nutrition in health and disease 10th ed 1000
Comprehensive Computational Chemistry 1000
Kelsen’s Legacy: Legal Normativity, International Law and Democracy 1000
Conference Record, IAS Annual Meeting 1977 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3550760
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3127089
关于积分的说明 9372085
捐赠科研通 2826248
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1553613
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 725007
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 714494