Comparison Between Eccentric vs. Concentric Muscle Actions On Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

古怪的 科克伦图书馆 荟萃分析 子群分析 肌肉肥大 等长运动 随机对照试验 科学网 医学 内科学 心脏病学 量子力学 物理
作者
Leonardo Santos Lopes da Silva,Leonardo da Silva Gonçalves,Pedro Henrique Alves Campos,Cicero Jonas R. Benjamim,Márcio Fernando Tasinafo Júnior,Leonardo Coelho Rabello de Lima,Carlos Roberto Bueno Júnior,Charles Phillipe de Lucena Alves
出处
期刊:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:39 (1): 115-134 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004981
摘要

ABSTRACT: da Silva, LSL, Gonçalves, LdS, Alves Campos, PH, Benjamim, CJR, Tasinafo Júnior, MF, de Lima, LCR, Bueno Júnior, CR, and Alves, CPdL. Comparison between eccentric vs. concentric muscle actions on hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): 115-134, 2025-Different physiological mechanisms of sarcomere activity during eccentric (ECC) and concentric (CON) muscle actions led to investigations into muscle hypertrophy outcomes, but conclusions remain elusive. We aimed to investigate the effects of ECC vs. CON muscle actions on muscle hypertrophy in apparently healthy adults through a systematic review with meta-analysis. The searches were conducted on EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to: (a) be randomized/controlled trials; (b) investigate the effects of CON vs. ECC resistance training programs in apparently healthy adults; (c) assess hypertrophy outcomes using direct imaging for cross-sectional area, muscle thickness, or muscle volume. A total of 15,778 studies were identified, and 26 (682 subjects included in the meta-analysis) met the inclusion criteria. The main findings indicated no statistical difference between ECC vs. CON on hypertrophy measurements (0.285 [95% CI: -0.131 to 0.701]; p = 0.179; I2: 84.4%; GRADE: very low). Subgroup meta-analysis analyzing possible hypertrophy outcome moderators as age (18-59 years old and ≥60 years old) and weeks of intervention duration (>8 weeks) did not reveal differences between ECC vs. CON. Subgroup analysis revealed an effect favoring the ECC for the upper limb muscles (p = 0.018), ≤8 weeks of intervention (p = 0.046), muscle thickness assessment (p = 0.0352), and isokinetic contraction (p = 0.0251). Our findings suggest similar hypertrophy between ECC and CON muscle actions in apparently healthy adults. However, it appears that the muscles of the upper limbs, shorter interventions, hypertrophy assessment method, and the contraction type may favor ECC muscle actions.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
香蕉觅云应助sadsada采纳,获得10
1秒前
NANA完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
ZetaGundam发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
方天完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
徐德民发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
6秒前
修仙中应助徐州DV采纳,获得10
7秒前
洋洋应助臣子采纳,获得10
7秒前
英姑应助方天采纳,获得10
7秒前
初景发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
蒋学金发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
源味小王发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
snow发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
刘旭阳完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
小蜗牛发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
duan发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
DW应助畅快的荣轩采纳,获得10
16秒前
雨姐科研发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
ho完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
正直静曼完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
夏雪儿发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
臣子完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
22秒前
23秒前
Ditf完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
25秒前
要减肥的鱼完成签到,获得积分20
28秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Cardiovascular Research and Medicine(2e) 820
自動車の空力技術 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7781791
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9321417
关于积分的说明 20382975
捐赠科研通 7369678
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3320126
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2467955
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2336049