Comparison Between Eccentric vs. Concentric Muscle Actions On Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

古怪的 科克伦图书馆 荟萃分析 子群分析 肌肉肥大 等长运动 随机对照试验 科学网 医学 内科学 心脏病学 量子力学 物理
作者
Leonardo Santos Lopes da Silva,Leonardo da Silva Gonçalves,Pedro Henrique Alves Campos,Cicero Jonas R. Benjamim,Márcio Fernando Tasinafo Júnior,Leonardo Coelho Rabello de Lima,Carlos Roberto Bueno Júnior,Charles Phillipe de Lucena Alves
出处
期刊:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:39 (1): 115-134 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004981
摘要

ABSTRACT: da Silva, LSL, Gonçalves, LdS, Alves Campos, PH, Benjamim, CJR, Tasinafo Júnior, MF, de Lima, LCR, Bueno Júnior, CR, and Alves, CPdL. Comparison between eccentric vs. concentric muscle actions on hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): 115-134, 2025-Different physiological mechanisms of sarcomere activity during eccentric (ECC) and concentric (CON) muscle actions led to investigations into muscle hypertrophy outcomes, but conclusions remain elusive. We aimed to investigate the effects of ECC vs. CON muscle actions on muscle hypertrophy in apparently healthy adults through a systematic review with meta-analysis. The searches were conducted on EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to: (a) be randomized/controlled trials; (b) investigate the effects of CON vs. ECC resistance training programs in apparently healthy adults; (c) assess hypertrophy outcomes using direct imaging for cross-sectional area, muscle thickness, or muscle volume. A total of 15,778 studies were identified, and 26 (682 subjects included in the meta-analysis) met the inclusion criteria. The main findings indicated no statistical difference between ECC vs. CON on hypertrophy measurements (0.285 [95% CI: -0.131 to 0.701]; p = 0.179; I2: 84.4%; GRADE: very low). Subgroup meta-analysis analyzing possible hypertrophy outcome moderators as age (18-59 years old and ≥60 years old) and weeks of intervention duration (>8 weeks) did not reveal differences between ECC vs. CON. Subgroup analysis revealed an effect favoring the ECC for the upper limb muscles (p = 0.018), ≤8 weeks of intervention (p = 0.046), muscle thickness assessment (p = 0.0352), and isokinetic contraction (p = 0.0251). Our findings suggest similar hypertrophy between ECC and CON muscle actions in apparently healthy adults. However, it appears that the muscles of the upper limbs, shorter interventions, hypertrophy assessment method, and the contraction type may favor ECC muscle actions.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
ffw1发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
不配.应助孙悟空大巨人采纳,获得50
3秒前
寒月完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
独特沛菡发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
六吉吉女士完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
yhd发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
结实智宸完成签到,获得积分0
6秒前
斯文的尔冬完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
zzz发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
小敏完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
zjf完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
张吴两胜发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
xwf发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
bolangzuishengwu完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
大个应助Bordyfan采纳,获得10
12秒前
zjf发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
不配.应助孙悟空大巨人采纳,获得50
13秒前
大个应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
SAIKIMORI完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
淡然不言发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
咳嗽・喀痰の診療ガイドライン第2版2025 800
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 800
Electrode Potentials 550
《KNN基无铅压电陶瓷电学性能优化与物理机理研究》 500
The globalisation of real estate: the politics and practice of foreign real estate investment 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7010429
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8684231
关于积分的说明 18408755
捐赠科研通 6495939
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3104781
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2173998
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2080876