Comparison Between Eccentric vs. Concentric Muscle Actions On Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

同心的 古怪的 肌肉肥大 医学 内科学 物理医学与康复 解剖 数学 几何学 工程类 结构工程
作者
Leonardo Santos Lopes da Silva,Leonardo da Silva Gonçalves,Pedro Henrique Alves Campos,Cicero Jonas R. Benjamim,Márcio Fernando Tasinafo Júnior,Leonardo Coelho Rabello de Lima,Carlos Roberto Bueno Júnior,Charles Phillipe de Lucena Alves
出处
期刊:PubMed 卷期号:39 (1): 115-134
标识
DOI:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004981
摘要

da Silva, LSL, Gonçalves, LdS, Alves Campos, PH, Benjamim, CJR, Tasinafo Júnior, MF, de Lima, LCR, Bueno Júnior, CR, and Alves, CPdL. Comparison between eccentric vs. concentric muscle actions on hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): 115-134, 2025-Different physiological mechanisms of sarcomere activity during eccentric (ECC) and concentric (CON) muscle actions led to investigations into muscle hypertrophy outcomes, but conclusions remain elusive. We aimed to investigate the effects of ECC vs. CON muscle actions on muscle hypertrophy in apparently healthy adults through a systematic review with meta-analysis. The searches were conducted on EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to: (a) be randomized/controlled trials; (b) investigate the effects of CON vs. ECC resistance training programs in apparently healthy adults; (c) assess hypertrophy outcomes using direct imaging for cross-sectional area, muscle thickness, or muscle volume. A total of 15,778 studies were identified, and 26 (682 subjects included in the meta-analysis) met the inclusion criteria. The main findings indicated no statistical difference between ECC vs. CON on hypertrophy measurements (0.285 [95% CI: -0.131 to 0.701]; p = 0.179; I2: 84.4%; GRADE: very low). Subgroup meta-analysis analyzing possible hypertrophy outcome moderators as age (18-59 years old and ≥60 years old) and weeks of intervention duration (>8 weeks) did not reveal differences between ECC vs. CON. Subgroup analysis revealed an effect favoring the ECC for the upper limb muscles (p = 0.018), ≤8 weeks of intervention (p = 0.046), muscle thickness assessment (p = 0.0352), and isokinetic contraction (p = 0.0251). Our findings suggest similar hypertrophy between ECC and CON muscle actions in apparently healthy adults. However, it appears that the muscles of the upper limbs, shorter interventions, hypertrophy assessment method, and the contraction type may favor ECC muscle actions.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
迪迦完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Estella发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
倔驴发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
倷倷完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
SciGPT应助McGrady采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
个性凡儿完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
wang97发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
lzq完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
522完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
jxm完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
Zoe_Zhang发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
langchaozhong发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
彭于晏应助wangli采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
Joanna完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
南瓜豆腐完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
东莱牧鲲完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
McGrady发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
wwj完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
小马甲应助852采纳,获得10
18秒前
mrt发布了新的文献求助30
18秒前
19秒前
20秒前
Cosmicspirit完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
kokjh发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
123发布了新的文献求助20
24秒前
26秒前
27秒前
zoe发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
29秒前
29秒前
痴情的尔丝关注了科研通微信公众号
29秒前
小白发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
脑洞疼应助Estella采纳,获得10
30秒前
瞿寒发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, Fourth Edition 1000
Determination of the boron concentration in diamond using optical spectroscopy 600
The Netter Collection of Medical Illustrations: Digestive System, Volume 9, Part III - Liver, Biliary Tract, and Pancreas (3rd Edition) 600
Founding Fathers The Shaping of America 500
A new house rat (Mammalia: Rodentia: Muridae) from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands 500
Writing to the Rhythm of Labor Cultural Politics of the Chinese Revolution, 1942–1976 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4545841
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3977345
关于积分的说明 12316080
捐赠科研通 3645565
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2007662
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1043268
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 932088