亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Comparison Between Eccentric vs. Concentric Muscle Actions On Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

古怪的 科克伦图书馆 荟萃分析 子群分析 肌肉肥大 等长运动 随机对照试验 科学网 医学 内科学 心脏病学 量子力学 物理
作者
Leonardo Santos Lopes da Silva,Leonardo da Silva Gonçalves,Pedro Henrique Alves Campos,Cicero Jonas R. Benjamim,Márcio Fernando Tasinafo Júnior,Leonardo Coelho Rabello de Lima,Carlos Roberto Bueno Júnior,Charles Phillipe de Lucena Alves
出处
期刊:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:39 (1): 115-134 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004981
摘要

ABSTRACT: da Silva, LSL, Gonçalves, LdS, Alves Campos, PH, Benjamim, CJR, Tasinafo Júnior, MF, de Lima, LCR, Bueno Júnior, CR, and Alves, CPdL. Comparison between eccentric vs. concentric muscle actions on hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 39(1): 115-134, 2025-Different physiological mechanisms of sarcomere activity during eccentric (ECC) and concentric (CON) muscle actions led to investigations into muscle hypertrophy outcomes, but conclusions remain elusive. We aimed to investigate the effects of ECC vs. CON muscle actions on muscle hypertrophy in apparently healthy adults through a systematic review with meta-analysis. The searches were conducted on EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to: (a) be randomized/controlled trials; (b) investigate the effects of CON vs. ECC resistance training programs in apparently healthy adults; (c) assess hypertrophy outcomes using direct imaging for cross-sectional area, muscle thickness, or muscle volume. A total of 15,778 studies were identified, and 26 (682 subjects included in the meta-analysis) met the inclusion criteria. The main findings indicated no statistical difference between ECC vs. CON on hypertrophy measurements (0.285 [95% CI: -0.131 to 0.701]; p = 0.179; I2: 84.4%; GRADE: very low). Subgroup meta-analysis analyzing possible hypertrophy outcome moderators as age (18-59 years old and ≥60 years old) and weeks of intervention duration (>8 weeks) did not reveal differences between ECC vs. CON. Subgroup analysis revealed an effect favoring the ECC for the upper limb muscles (p = 0.018), ≤8 weeks of intervention (p = 0.046), muscle thickness assessment (p = 0.0352), and isokinetic contraction (p = 0.0251). Our findings suggest similar hypertrophy between ECC and CON muscle actions in apparently healthy adults. However, it appears that the muscles of the upper limbs, shorter interventions, hypertrophy assessment method, and the contraction type may favor ECC muscle actions.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
10秒前
肥肉叉烧发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助Hehhhh采纳,获得10
28秒前
可爱慕卉发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
Wang完成签到 ,获得积分20
1分钟前
1分钟前
可爱慕卉完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
Hehhhh发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
MyXu完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
Hehhhh完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
Green完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
肥肉叉烧发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
Lenna45完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
搜集达人应助双双采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
双双发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
orixero应助酷酷的大米采纳,获得10
5分钟前
charih完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
Anya完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
qyn1234566发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
Nexus应助qyn1234566采纳,获得10
5分钟前
打打应助王大丫采纳,获得10
5分钟前
huanhuan发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
肥肉叉烧发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
整齐的不评完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
酷波er应助空竹采纳,获得10
6分钟前
6分钟前
qyn1234566完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
空竹发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
南风吹完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
空竹完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
顺子完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
高分求助中
GL 2 A method for assessing the in-place cleanability of food processing equipment, Fourth Edition, December 2023 3000
Annie Ernaux: De la perte au corps glorieux 600
Writing Systems 500
类器官构建与应用:从基础到前沿 500
Electric Vehicle Powertrains Design Fundamentals, Components, and Applications 400
Handbook on Planning and Climate Change Adaptation 400
Optical Coating Design with the Essential Macleod 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6803087
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8520926
关于积分的说明 18142356
捐赠科研通 6122010
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3026717
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2003287
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1997645