亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Unraveling the gender gap in negotiation: How children’s perceptions of negotiation and of themselves relate to their bargaining outcomes.

谈判 心理学 社会心理学 心理信息 感知 人际交往 背景(考古学) 发展心理学 能力(人力资源) 社会学 政治学 梅德林 古生物学 神经科学 法学 生物 社会科学
作者
Sophie H. Arnold,Katherine McAuliffe,Andrei Cimpian
出处
期刊:Developmental Psychology [American Psychological Association]
标识
DOI:10.1037/dev0001898
摘要

Women tend to negotiate less than men, which-along with other well-documented interpersonal and structural factors-contributes to persistent gender gaps in pay for equal work. Here, we explore the developmental origins of these gender differences in negotiation. Across three studies (N = 462), we investigated 6- to 12-year-old girls' and boys' perceptions of negotiation (e.g., how common and permissible it is to negotiate) and gave children opportunities to negotiate for resources themselves. These opportunities were hypothetical in Studies 1 and 2 and actual in Study 3. Overall, girls and boys had similar perceptions of negotiation. However, the links between perceptions and negotiation behavior often differed by gender, especially in the context of an actual negotiation (Study 3). Boys'-but not girls'-negotiation requests were higher when they thought that (a) other children asked for more, (b) it was permissible to ask for more, (c) they would not receive backlash for asking for more, and (d) asking for more would actually get them more. In contrast, girls' negotiation requests were uniquely predicted by how competent they thought they were at the task for which they negotiated a reward-that is, how deserving they thought they were. Notably, boys overestimated their competence (both relative to girls and relative to reality) and negotiated for more resources as a result. Understanding the early origins of gender differences in negotiation provides insight into how to prevent the emergence of such differences and dismantle persistent gender inequities in society. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI6.1应助jy采纳,获得10
1秒前
无私匕完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
13秒前
14秒前
18秒前
jy发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
嘻嘻哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
35秒前
35秒前
35秒前
35秒前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
37秒前
领导范儿应助Elen1987采纳,获得10
40秒前
41秒前
科研通AI6.1应助jy采纳,获得10
53秒前
54秒前
59秒前
Lucas应助KKLUV采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
jy发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
伊力扎提完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
孙泉发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
852应助zslg采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
科研通AI6应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
zslg发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
3分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
从k到英国情人 1500
Ägyptische Geschichte der 21.–30. Dynastie 1100
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1100
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5732308
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5338178
关于积分的说明 15322147
捐赠科研通 4877945
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2620761
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1569978
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1526615