Do reminders of God increase willingness to take risks?

心理学 启动(农业) 社会心理学 考试(生物学) 娱乐 法学 古生物学 植物 发芽 政治学 生物
作者
Cindel White,Chloe Dean,Kristin Laurin
出处
期刊:Journal of Experimental Social Psychology [Elsevier]
卷期号:110: 104539-104539 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104539
摘要

Many people, and American Christians in particular, view God as a benevolent protector. Those who believe in God may therefore expect that they can safely engage in potentially risky activities, secure in the knowledge that God will look out for their best interests and ensure good outcomes. Initial experiments supported this hypothesis, but recent attempts to replicate them failed. This unreliable pattern may reflect a false conceptual hypothesis, or an inadequate method: Both the initial reports and the replication attempts used outdated religious priming methods we now know to be ineffective. The present research aimed to clarify the relationship between thinking about God and risk-taking behaviors. A pilot study (N = 264) showed that American Christians do expect that God will protect them during risky activities; moreover, those who hold this expectation more strongly report greater willingness to take risks. This registered report then used a high-powered preregistered experiment to test whether having participants explicitly think about God's (presumably protective) influence over what happens in their lives increases their willingness to take risks. Results confirmed that American Christian participants were more willing to take non-moral risks when thinking about God, compared to a control condition, d = 0.28, 95% CI [0.12, 0.44], p < .001. This pattern was robust to different exclusion criteria and was consistent across domains of career, recreational, and social risks. By using the most recent and sensitive methods, this study provides a more definitive test of the conceptual hypothesis that thinking about God can influence risk-taking.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
啦啦啦发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
彩色的舞蹈完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
跳跃小伙发布了新的文献求助100
2秒前
2秒前
蓝天发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
狐妖完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
Tingting发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Cole完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
埋头赶路完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
温乐松发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
差差你在干什么完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
pretty完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
天天快乐应助墨小菊采纳,获得10
6秒前
一亩蔬菜发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
耶喽小黄完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
lavande发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
Cookie发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
是个哑巴发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
lty完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
蔡蔡完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
JamesPei应助吃薯条采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
Udo发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Xgg完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
xueshu发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
Zzz发布了新的文献求助20
16秒前
Pom完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
酷波er应助Yuting采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
Cookie完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
小乔应助黎明之前采纳,获得10
20秒前
剧院的饭桶完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
xcc发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 8000
Encyclopedia of Reproduction Third Edition 3000
Comprehensive Methanol Science Production, Applications, and Emerging Technologies 2000
From Victimization to Aggression 1000
Study and Interlaboratory Validation of Simultaneous LC-MS/MS Method for Food Allergens Using Model Processed Foods 500
Red Book: 2024–2027 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5646330
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4770916
关于积分的说明 15034350
捐赠科研通 4805112
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2569392
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1526467
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1485812