Do reminders of God increase willingness to take risks?

心理学 启动(农业) 社会心理学 考试(生物学) 娱乐 法学 古生物学 植物 发芽 政治学 生物
作者
Cindel White,Chloe Dean,Kristin Laurin
出处
期刊:Journal of Experimental Social Psychology [Elsevier]
卷期号:110: 104539-104539 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104539
摘要

Many people, and American Christians in particular, view God as a benevolent protector. Those who believe in God may therefore expect that they can safely engage in potentially risky activities, secure in the knowledge that God will look out for their best interests and ensure good outcomes. Initial experiments supported this hypothesis, but recent attempts to replicate them failed. This unreliable pattern may reflect a false conceptual hypothesis, or an inadequate method: Both the initial reports and the replication attempts used outdated religious priming methods we now know to be ineffective. The present research aimed to clarify the relationship between thinking about God and risk-taking behaviors. A pilot study (N = 264) showed that American Christians do expect that God will protect them during risky activities; moreover, those who hold this expectation more strongly report greater willingness to take risks. This registered report then used a high-powered preregistered experiment to test whether having participants explicitly think about God's (presumably protective) influence over what happens in their lives increases their willingness to take risks. Results confirmed that American Christian participants were more willing to take non-moral risks when thinking about God, compared to a control condition, d = 0.28, 95% CI [0.12, 0.44], p < .001. This pattern was robust to different exclusion criteria and was consistent across domains of career, recreational, and social risks. By using the most recent and sensitive methods, this study provides a more definitive test of the conceptual hypothesis that thinking about God can influence risk-taking.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
汉堡包应助壮观觅柔采纳,获得30
刚刚
Mint完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
威武雪兰完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
may完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
领导范儿应助wwww采纳,获得10
4秒前
热心鱼完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Hey发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Merry8558完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
coc发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
NexusExplorer应助Ico采纳,获得50
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
科目三应助felinus采纳,获得10
8秒前
庸俗完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI6应助YYYYZ采纳,获得10
9秒前
11秒前
XIAOJU_U完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
热心鱼发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
CipherSage应助Quhang采纳,获得10
12秒前
机智的天宇完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
沧沧完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
dann完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
吱唔朱完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
17秒前
小透明发布了新的文献求助150
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 6000
Encyclopedia of Reproduction Third Edition 3000
Comprehensive Methanol Science Production, Applications, and Emerging Technologies 2000
化妆品原料学 1000
The Political Psychology of Citizens in Rising China 800
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5637553
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4743563
关于积分的说明 14999628
捐赠科研通 4795653
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2562146
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1521595
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1481573