Do reminders of God increase willingness to take risks?

心理学 启动(农业) 社会心理学 考试(生物学) 娱乐 法学 古生物学 植物 发芽 政治学 生物
作者
Cindel White,Chloe Dean,Kristin Laurin
出处
期刊:Journal of Experimental Social Psychology [Elsevier]
卷期号:110: 104539-104539 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104539
摘要

Many people, and American Christians in particular, view God as a benevolent protector. Those who believe in God may therefore expect that they can safely engage in potentially risky activities, secure in the knowledge that God will look out for their best interests and ensure good outcomes. Initial experiments supported this hypothesis, but recent attempts to replicate them failed. This unreliable pattern may reflect a false conceptual hypothesis, or an inadequate method: Both the initial reports and the replication attempts used outdated religious priming methods we now know to be ineffective. The present research aimed to clarify the relationship between thinking about God and risk-taking behaviors. A pilot study (N = 264) showed that American Christians do expect that God will protect them during risky activities; moreover, those who hold this expectation more strongly report greater willingness to take risks. This registered report then used a high-powered preregistered experiment to test whether having participants explicitly think about God's (presumably protective) influence over what happens in their lives increases their willingness to take risks. Results confirmed that American Christian participants were more willing to take non-moral risks when thinking about God, compared to a control condition, d = 0.28, 95% CI [0.12, 0.44], p < .001. This pattern was robust to different exclusion criteria and was consistent across domains of career, recreational, and social risks. By using the most recent and sensitive methods, this study provides a more definitive test of the conceptual hypothesis that thinking about God can influence risk-taking.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
贾敬坤发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
小白菜完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
zzz关闭了zzz文献求助
4秒前
JIEYU完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
泡泡糖发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
萌酱完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
伍文凯发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
YTT发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
墨羽完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
脑洞疼应助saltttyyy采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
一支蜡笔发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
2799完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
努力的学发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
做一只快乐的猪猪侠完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
11秒前
fancy发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
傻傻的小丑孩完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
今后应助湿地小怪兽采纳,获得10
13秒前
CodeCraft应助kk采纳,获得10
14秒前
泡泡糖完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
彭于晏应助NGU采纳,获得10
16秒前
脆脆鲨完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
闪闪平灵发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
浮游应助dcc采纳,获得10
17秒前
科研通AI6应助羞涩的寒松采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
北北北发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1001
The Antibodies, Vol. 2,3,4,5,6 1000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 1000
On the application of advanced modeling tools to the SLB analysis in NuScale. Part I: TRACE/PARCS, TRACE/PANTHER and ATHLET/DYN3D 500
L-Arginine Encapsulated Mesoporous MCM-41 Nanoparticles: A Study on In Vitro Release as Well as Kinetics 500
Virus-like particles empower RNAi for effective control of a Coleopteran pest 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5461138
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4566175
关于积分的说明 14303831
捐赠科研通 4491884
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2460490
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1449811
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1425582