阻力训练
心理学
应用心理学
心理干预
系统回顾
抗性(生态学)
包裹体(矿物)
力量训练
结构效度
构造(python库)
有氧运动
物理疗法
心理测量学
梅德林
临床心理学
医学
社会心理学
计算机科学
程序设计语言
生态学
精神科
政治学
法学
生物
作者
Justin Kompf,Ryan E. Rhodes
标识
DOI:10.1080/1091367x.2023.2258869
摘要
ABSTRACTThe measurement of resistance training (RT) is often based on adaptations of aerobic physical activity measures which may not contain the elements necessary to assess RT. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine what measures are used to assess RT and appraise their composition. Specifically, the inclusion of frequency, duration, intensity, the use of major muscle groups, reps, and sets. Search terms included "resistance training," "strength training," OR "weight training" AND "behavior" OR "participation." Studies were evaluated based on whether RT measures assessed the key components of participation. In the 92 included studies, only one of the six components of the RT recommendations was assessed on average. This was almost exclusively frequency. Many assessments of RT were adapted from aerobic measures without rigorous validity evidence. Construct validity in RT measurement may lead to improved public health recommendations, surveillance of behavior, and precision in determining effective interventions and correlates.KEYWORDS: Resistance trainingstrength trainingassessmentmeasurementbehavior Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2023.2258869Additional informationFundingThis work was not supported by any grant.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI