比例(比率)
同时有效性
探索性因素分析
概化理论
矛盾心理
心理学
内部一致性
医疗保健
老年学
临床心理学
检查表
护理部
医学
心理测量学
社会心理学
发展心理学
物理
经济
认知心理学
量子力学
经济增长
作者
Sylvie D’hondt,Isabelle Aujoulat,Jean‐Marie Degryse
出处
期刊:Gerontologist
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2023-10-17
卷期号:64 (4)
标识
DOI:10.1093/geront/gnad136
摘要
Abstract Background and Objectives The aim of this study was to adapt and validate the Ambivalent Ageism Scale (AAS) among paramedical students for use in the health care sector. Research Design and Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among the following paramedical students: physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and nursing students. A total of 6 items were added based on the literature and the scale was evaluated by students and professors with experience working with older adults. The following psychometric properties were evaluated: internal consistency, concurrent validity, structural validity (exploratory factor analysis), and reliability. Results A total of 265 students participated: 19.2% physiotherapy students, 27.5% occupational therapy students, 50.6% nursing students, and 2.6% other paramedical students. The concurrent validity study showed a significant correlation between AAShc (Ambivalent Ageism Scale in the health care sector) and UCLA-GAS-F (French version of the University of California, Los Angeles Geriatric Attitudes Scale) with r (265) = 0.491 (p < .001). The factor analyses produced an 18-item (α = 0.866) scale composed of 5 factors: Infantilization (5 items, α = 0.766), Control (2 items, α = 0.789), Overaccommodation (2 items, α = 0.829), Unwanted help (2 items, α = 0.656), and Hostile Ageism (7 items, α = 0.717). Finally, the generalizability analysis revealed a G-coefficient of 0.86, a Phi-coefficient of 0.83, and a standard error of measurement of 2.31%. Discussion and Implications The AAShc appears to be a valid and reliable scale to measure ageism among paramedical students. This scale can be a useful tool to reduce ageism toward older adults in the health care sector.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI