排名(信息检索)
计算机科学
人气
秩(图论)
期限(时间)
妥协
灵敏度(控制系统)
概率逻辑
选择(遗传算法)
互联网
机器学习
人工智能
数据挖掘
数学
心理学
物理
电子工程
社会学
万维网
工程类
组合数学
社会心理学
量子力学
社会科学
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119620
摘要
With the popularity of the Internet and the growing complexity of COVID-19, more and more patients tend to consult doctors online. With the difficulty of doctor selection caused by a massive amount of information, this study proposes a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework, which can model patients' emotional intensity through heterogeneous information and rank doctors. Firstly, online reviews (ORs) are transformed into probabilistic linguistic term sets through sentiment analysis. Then, new score functions are proposed considering the nonlinear influence of doctors' information and the patients' negative bias toward ORs. Next, a method of weight determination combining the Term Frequency Inverse Document Frequency and the Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory method is proposed. Finally, the proposed score functions are applied to the Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method to aggregate information and rank doctors. The proposed method is verified in a case study on haodf.com. The results show that considering the emotional intensity of heterogeneous information will make the recommendations more realistic. Comparative analysis and sensitivity analysis are further performed to illustrate the availability and effectiveness of the proposed method.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI