Hybrid surgery versus endovascular intervention for patients with chronic internal carotid artery occlusion: A single-center retrospective study

医学 四分位间距 颈动脉内膜切除术 颈动脉支架置入术 围手术期 动脉内膜切除术 单中心 外科 颈内动脉 回顾性队列研究 冲程(发动机) 闭塞 血运重建 颈动脉 内科学 心肌梗塞 机械工程 工程类
作者
Tao Sun,Yiming He,Fei Wang,Bo Mao,Muxin Han,Peng Zhao,Wei Wu,Yunyan Wang,Xingang Li,Donghai Wang
出处
期刊:Frontiers in Surgery [Frontiers Media SA]
卷期号:9 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.976318
摘要

Chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) can cause transient ischemic attack (TIA) and ischemic stroke. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) with embolic protection devices and hybrid surgery combining carotid endarterectomy and endovascular treatment are effective methods for carotid revascularization. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect and safety of the two surgical procedures.This was a single-center retrospective study. In this study, 44 patients who underwent hybrid surgery and 35 who underwent endovascular intervention (EI) at our center were enrolled consecutively between May 2016 and March 2022. All patients were classified into four groups (A-D), as described by Hasan et al. We recorded and analyzed clinical data, angiographic characteristics, technical success rate, perioperative complications, and follow-up data.There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between hybrid surgery group and EI group, except for plasma high density lipoproteins (HDL) levels (median [interquartile range]: hybrid surgery, 0.99 [0.88-1.18] vs. EI, 0.85 [0.78-0.98] mmol/L, P = 0.001). The technical success rate of hybrid surgery was higher than that of EI (37/44 [84.1%] vs. 18/35 [51.4%], P = 0.002; type A: 15/16 [93.8%] vs. 10/11 [90.9%], P = 1.000; type B: 9/10 [90.0%] vs. 5/7 [71.4%], P = 0.537; type C: 12/15 [80.0%] vs. 3/12 [25.0%], P = 0.004; type D: 1/3 [33.3%] vs. 0/5 [0%], P = 0.375). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of perioperative complications between the two procedures (hybrid surgery: 7/44 [15.9%] vs. EI: 6/35 [17.1%], P = 0.883). In addition, there were no significant differences in the rates of stroke and restenosis during follow-up.For patients with symptomatic CICAO, hybrid surgery may have an advantage over EI in successfully recanalizing occluded segments. There was no significant difference in safety and restenosis between hybrid surgery and EI.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
难过梦山完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
xyc_liang发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
arizaki7应助丰富的以筠采纳,获得10
2秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
斯文败类应助刘的花采纳,获得10
3秒前
公冶灵安完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
无辜寄云完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
无敌吴硕发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
科研通AI2S应助向大象采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
leuskz发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
闫111发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
研友_5Z4ZA5发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
万能图书馆应助无辜寄云采纳,获得10
8秒前
桐桐应助Asteroid采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
wcw发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
9秒前
顶刊发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
panini发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
10秒前
morty发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
3089ggf发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
久居i应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
大个应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6017601
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7603311
关于积分的说明 16156651
捐赠科研通 5165401
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2764881
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1746262
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1635210