锂(药物)
电解质
溶剂
X射线光电子能谱
盐(化学)
酰亚胺
无机化学
六氟磷酸盐
化学
化学工程
离子液体
物理化学
有机化学
电极
工程类
内分泌学
催化作用
医学
作者
Weilai Yu,Zhiao Yu,Yi Cui,Zhenan Bao
出处
期刊:ACS energy letters
[American Chemical Society]
日期:2022-09-06
卷期号:7 (10): 3270-3275
被引量:102
标识
DOI:10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01587
摘要
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is one of the most common techniques to characterize the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) in battery research. However, residual salt or solvent can produce spectroscopic artifacts that complicate the evaluation of actual SEI chemistry. Herein, we present a systematic XPS study of three different Li salts, namely lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI), lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), and lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6). A side-by-side comparison reveals that the binding energies of constituent elements sensitively shift in response to their distinct chemical environments. Strikingly, all three Li salts consistently transformed into LiF under Ar+ sputtering, pointing out the importance of complete salt removal before XPS analysis. Residue from organic solvent or impurities from sample surface to bulk were found specific to the solvent–salt combination, which should be distinguished from the real organic SEI. Overall, this set of benchmark studies not only offers a valuable reference for peak assignment but also emphasizes the significance of control experiments to avoid potential pitfalls while identifying actual SEI components.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI