手法治疗
随机对照试验
医学
脊柱推拿
物理疗法
按摩
腰痛
科克伦图书馆
临床试验
系统回顾
梅德林
背痛
替代医学
外科
政治学
病理
法学
作者
Xue‐Qiang Wang,Yuling Wang,Jeremy Witchalls,Jia Han,Zhijie Zhang,Phil Page,Yi Zhu,Carla Stecco,Jianhua Lin,Doa El‐Ansary,Quansheng Ma,Qi Qi,Jae‐Seop Oh,Weiming Zhang,Adrian Pranata,Li Wan,Kui Li,Ming Ma,Lin Liao,Yulian Zhu,Jing-Wei Guo,Peijie Chen
标识
DOI:10.1177/02692155241229398
摘要
Objective To review the effectiveness of different physical therapies for acute and sub-acute low back pain supported by evidence, and create clinical recommendations and expert consensus for physiotherapists on clinical prescriptions. Data sources A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library for studies published within the previous 15 years. Review methods Systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials assessing patients with acute and sub-acute low back pain were included. Two reviewers independently screened relevant studies using the same inclusion criteria. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database and the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool were used to grade the quality assessment of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews, respectively. The final recommendation grades were based on the consensus discussion results of the Delphi of 22 international experts. Results Twenty-one systematic reviews and 21 randomized controlled trials were included. Spinal manipulative therapy and low-level laser therapy are recommended for acute low back pain. Core stability exercise/motor control, spinal manipulative therapy, and massage can be used to treat sub-acute low back pain. Conclusions The consensus statements provided medical staff with appliable recommendations of physical therapy for acute and sub-acute low back pain. This consensus statement will require regular updates after 5–10 years.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI