心理学
移情
指导
验证性因素分析
应对(心理学)
发展心理学
心理测量学
情商
临床心理学
社会心理学
结构方程建模
心理治疗师
数学
统计
作者
Gabriella King,Christiane E. Kehoe,Sophie S. Havighurst,George Youssef,Jacqui A. Macdonald,Julie C. Dunsmore,Tomer S Berkowitz,Elizabeth Westrupp
出处
期刊:Assessment
[SAGE]
日期:2022-11-01
卷期号:30 (6): 1947-1968
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1177/10731911221126919
摘要
The Coping with Children’s Negative Emotions Scale (CCNES) is a widely used measure of parent emotion socialization; however, it is a lengthy measure and it is unclear whether all items are appropriately aligned with, and fully capture, the underlying constructs. We aimed to examine content validity of the CCNES, evaluate the theoretical alignment between the CCNES and Gottman, Katz and Hooven’s meta-emotion theory, and develop two short-forms. Participants were parents of children aged 4 to 10 years ( N = 937) from the longitudinal study the Child and Parent Emotion Study ( https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/10/e038124 ). Content experts qualitatively evaluated parent-report items of the CCNES and additional items that measured empathy. Nineteen of the 84 items were found to not align with the meta-emotion theory. The latent structures of the CCNES and empathy subscales were quantitatively evaluated via confirmatory factor analysis. Items with poor psychometric properties were subsequently removed. An 18-item short-form (three emotion coaching subscales, three emotion dismissing subscales) and 6-item brief short-form (one emotion coaching subscale, one emotion dismissing subscale) with strong psychometric properties were created using a calibration sample ( n = 468, that is, 50% of N = 937) and cross-validated with a validation sample. The short-form CCNES measures provide viable, theoretically consistent alternatives to the original CCNES measure.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI