医学
倾向得分匹配
外科
显著性差异
胆管
排水
胆道引流
内科学
生态学
生物
作者
Taifeng Zhu,Ke Zhu,Jian Sun,Chao Liu,Haoming Lin,Rui Zhang
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.132
摘要
Although laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is considered a safe and effective method for the removal of bile duct stones, selecting primary duct closure (PDC) or T-tube drainage (TTD) following choledochotomy remains controversial. This study aims to explore the clinical effects of PDC and TTD after LCBDE.We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 348 patients with choledocholithiasis treated with LCBDE from January 2016 to October 2020. All patients were divided into PDC (225 cases) and TTD (123 cases) groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. We compared operative parameters and outcomes.After matching (n = 116/group), no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05) regarding intra-abdominal infection, incision infection, bile leakage, and retained stones. In terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative antibiotic use time, and postoperative abdominal drainage time, PDC group was obviously superior to TTD group (P < 0.05).Primary closure following LCBDE is considered a safe and effective alternative to T-tube drainage.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI