Efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib in adults and adolescents with alopecia areata: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2b–3 trial

医学 斑秃 临床终点 安慰剂 脱发 头皮 不利影响 内科学 随机对照试验 意向治疗分析 临床试验 泛秃 外科 胃肠病学 皮肤病科 替代医学 病理
作者
Brett King,Xingqi Zhang,Walter Gubelin Harcha,Jacek C. Szepietowski,Jerry Shapiro,Charles Lynde,Natasha Atanaskova Mesinkovska,Samuel H. Zwillich,Lynne Napatalung,Dalia Wajsbrot,Rana Fayyad,Amy Freyman,Debanjali Mitra,Vivek S. Purohit,Rodney Sinclair,Robert Wołk
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:401 (10387): 1518-1529 被引量:114
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00222-2
摘要

Background Alopecia areata is characterised by non-scarring loss of scalp, face, or body hair. We investigated the efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib, an oral, selective dual JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, in patients with alopecia areata. Methods In this randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2b–3 trial done at 118 sites in 18 countries, patients aged 12 years and older with alopecia areata and at least 50% scalp hair loss were randomly assigned to oral ritlecitinib or placebo once-daily for 24 weeks, with or without a 4-week loading dose (50 mg, 30 mg, 10 mg, 200 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg, or 200 mg loading dose followed by 30 mg), followed by a 24-week extension period during which ritlecitinib groups continued their assigned doses and patients initially assigned to placebo switched to ritlecitinib 50 mg or 200 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg. Randomisation was done by use of an interactive response system and was stratified by baseline disease severity and age. The sponsor, patients, and investigators were masked to treatment, and all patients received the same number of tablets to maintain masking. The primary endpoint was Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score 20 or less at week 24. The primary endpoint was assessed in all assigned patients, regardless of whether they received treatment. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03732807. Findings Between Dec 3, 2018, and June 24, 2021, 1097 patients were screened and 718 were randomly assigned to receive ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg (n=132), 200 mg + 30 mg (n=130), 50 mg (n=130), 30 mg (n=132), 10 mg (n=63), placebo to 50 mg (n=66), or placebo to 200 mg + 50 mg (n=65). 446 (62%) of 718 patients were female and 272 (38%) were male. 488 (68%) were White, 186 (26%) were Asian, and 27 (4%) were Black or African American. Of 718 patients randomly assigned, 104 patients discontinued treatment (34 withdrew, 19 adverse events [AEs], 12 physician decision, 12 lack of efficacy, 13 lost to follow up, five rolled over to long-term study transfer, four pregnancies, two protocol deviations, one declined to attend follow-up due to COVID-19, one attended last visit very late due to COVID-19, and one non-compliance). At week 24, 38 (31%) of 124 patients in the ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg group, 27 (22%) of 121 patients in the 200 mg + 30 mg group, 29 (23%) of 124 patients in the 50 mg group, 17 (14%) of 119 patients in the 30 mg group, and two (2%) of 130 patients in the placebo group had a response based on SALT score 20 or less. The difference in response rate based on SALT score 20 or less between the placebo and the ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg group was 29·1% (95% CI 21·2–37·9; p<0·0001), 20·8% (13·7–29·2; p<0·0001) for the 200 mg + 30 mg group, 21·9% (14·7–30·2; p<0·0001) for the 50 mg group, and 12·8% (6·7–20·4; p=0·0002) for the 30 mg group. Up to week 48 and including the follow-up period, AEs had been reported in 108 (82%) of 131 patients in the ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg group, 105 (81%) of 129 patients in the 200 mg + 30 mg group, 110 (85%) of 130 patients in the 50 mg group, 106 (80%) of 132 patients in the 30 mg group, 47 (76%) of 62 patients in the 10 mg group, 54 (83%) of 65 patients placebo to ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg in the extension period, and 57 (86%) of 66 patients in the placebo to 50 mg group. The incidence of each AE was similar between groups, and there were no deaths. Interpretation Ritlecitinib was effective and well tolerated in patients aged 12 years and older with alopecia areata. Ritlecitinib might be a suitable treatment option for alopecia areata in patients who are candidates for systemic therapy. Funding Pfizer.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
李健应助大鸡腿采纳,获得10
1秒前
lyz666发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
乐乐应助小樊同学采纳,获得10
2秒前
ossantu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
领导范儿应助hins采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
经济完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
鲨猫收藏家完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
勤劳涵山发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
彭于晏应助不二采纳,获得10
14秒前
李李李发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
烟花应助清脆的连虎采纳,获得10
15秒前
魏伯安发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
鲨鱼辣椒吼吼哈完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
Youtenter发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
pretty完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
清晾油发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
orixero应助WYQ采纳,获得10
20秒前
情怀应助hins采纳,获得80
20秒前
冰糖雪梨完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
所所应助Tq采纳,获得10
21秒前
23秒前
guozizi发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
24秒前
英姑应助CanaanWang1021采纳,获得10
25秒前
马赫发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
HHH完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
zzz发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
27秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
J'AI COMBATTU POUR MAO // ANNA WANG 660
Izeltabart tapatansine - AdisInsight 600
Introduction to Comparative Public Administration Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe, Third Edition 3rd edition 500
Geotechnical characterization of slope movements 500
Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3753383
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3296944
关于积分的说明 10096592
捐赠科研通 3011636
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1654098
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 788610
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 752947