Cost comparison of four venous catheters: Short peripheral catheter, Long peripheral line, Midline, and PICC for peripheral infusion

外围设备 医学 导管 外科 内科学
作者
Elise Meto,E. Cabout,Hervé Rosay,Michaël Darmon,Anne-Sophie Lot,Nathalie Mignet,Sabine Gnamien Clermont,R Launois
出处
期刊:Journal of Vascular Access [SAGE]
标识
DOI:10.1177/11297298241258257
摘要

Introduction: The use of midline catheters for patients requiring a peripheral IV infusion is sometimes limited by their cost. Although decision trees allow them to be positioned in relation to short peripheral cannulas (SPC), Midlines, and PICCs, their economic impact has not yet been evaluated. A study was conducted to estimate and compare the actual costs of using the three types of catheters for durations of 7, 14, and 21 days. Methods: A budget impact analysis compared midlines or mini-midlines/long peripheral cannulas (LPCs) with SPCs and PICCs for typical medical indications excluding indications requiring central line (infusion of irritant or vesicant drugs): treatment of peritonitis over 7 days, cystic fibrosis infection over 14 days, and meningitis over 21 days. A micro-costing study identified resources used during catheter care procedures (consumables, medical/nursing care, examinations, mechanical complications). The cost of remote systemic complications was estimated from the French national cost study. Literature review compared data based on published complication frequencies. Results: Midline is more economic than the SPC (saving of 39€ over 7 days and 174€ over 14 days), and than the PICC (saving of 102€ over 14 days and 95€ over 21 days). Discussion: Despite a much higher acquisition cost of the Midline than a SPC, the cost of using a Midline is lower. Although this approach cannot be the only argument for choosing a medical device, it can contribute to it in a tense economic context. The micro-costing has been performed in a center placing PICCline using fluoroscopy for catheter tip positioning. The implantation of a PICC with ECG technique does not require an interventional radiology facility and involves significantly lower logistical and personnel costs. This factor is a limitation in this study. However, even with the use of EGC, the cost difference is in favor of Midline.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
彭于晏应助宓不评采纳,获得10
1秒前
bkagyin应助小美采纳,获得10
2秒前
烂漫夜梅完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
坤坤完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
--发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Flora完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
FashionBoy应助cccc采纳,获得10
4秒前
123发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
CodeCraft应助nan采纳,获得10
4秒前
疯花血月发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
山橘月完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
在水一方应助.。。采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
共享精神应助嘻嘻采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
小小技术工完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
wangbq给wangbq的求助进行了留言
6秒前
今后应助66m37采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
小木完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
山橘月发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
明亮的冰颜完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
wz完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
小美完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
10秒前
子凡完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
小木发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
吃不饱星球球长应助123采纳,获得20
12秒前
光亮笑柳发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
开心夏云应助asiera采纳,获得10
13秒前
无语的鱼完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
宓不评发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 600
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
A new species of Velataspis (Hemiptera Coccoidea Diaspididae) from tea in Assam 500
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3156528
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2807966
关于积分的说明 7875565
捐赠科研通 2466256
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1312779
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 630273
版权声明 601919