Beyond PI-RADS: Combining MRI PI-RADS and PSMA-PET/CT PRIMARY Score in a Composite (P) Score for More Accurate Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

前列腺癌 医学 核医学 放射科 癌症 内科学
作者
Louise Emmett,Nathan Papa,Thomas A. Hope,Wolfgang P. Fendler,Jérémie Calais,Irene A. Burger,Matthias Eiber,Francesco Barbato,Daniel Moon,William Counter,Nikeith John,Alan Xue,Anthony Franklin,James Thompson,K. Rasiah,Mark Frydenberg,John Yaxley,James Buteau,Shikha Agrawal,Bao Ho,Andrew Nguyen,Victor Liu,Jonathan K. Lee,Henry H. Woo,Edward Hsiao,Tom Sutherland,E. Perry,Phillip D. Stricker,Michael S. Hofman,Veeru Kasivisvanathan,Matthew Roberts,Declan G. Murphy
出处
期刊:The Journal of Urology [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:212 (2): 299-309
标识
DOI:10.1097/ju.0000000000004010
摘要

No AccessJournal of UrologyOriginal Clinical Article17 May 2024Beyond PI-RADS: Combining MRI PI-RADS and PSMA-PET/CT PRIMARY Score in a Composite (P) Score for More Accurate Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate CancerThis article is commented on by the following:Editorial Comment Louise Emmett, Nathan Papa, Thomas A. Hope, Wolfgang Fendler, Jeremie Calais, Irene Burger, Matthias Eiber, Francesco Barbato, Daniel Moon, William Counter, Nikeith John, Alan Xue, Anthony Franklin, James Thompson, Kris Rasiah, Mark Frydenberg, John Yaxley, James Buteau, Shikha Agrawal, Bao Ho, Andrew Nguyen, Victor Liu, Jonathan Lee, Henry Woo, Edward Hsiao, Thomas Sutherland, Elyse Perry, Phillip Stricker, Michael S. Hofman, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Matthew Roberts, and Declan Murphy Louise EmmettLouise Emmett Corresponding Author: Louise Emmett, Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney ( ([email protected]) ) , Nathan PapaNathan Papa , Thomas A. HopeThomas A. Hope , Wolfgang FendlerWolfgang Fendler , Jeremie CalaisJeremie Calais , Irene BurgerIrene Burger , Matthias EiberMatthias Eiber , Francesco BarbatoFrancesco Barbato , Daniel MoonDaniel Moon , William CounterWilliam Counter , Nikeith JohnNikeith John , Alan XueAlan Xue , Anthony FranklinAnthony Franklin , James ThompsonJames Thompson , Kris RasiahKris Rasiah , Mark FrydenbergMark Frydenberg , John YaxleyJohn Yaxley , James ButeauJames Buteau , Shikha AgrawalShikha Agrawal , Bao HoBao Ho Corresponding Author: Louise Emmett, Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney ( ([email protected]) ) , Andrew NguyenAndrew Nguyen , Victor LiuVictor Liu , Jonathan LeeJonathan Lee , Henry WooHenry Woo , Edward HsiaoEdward Hsiao , Thomas SutherlandThomas Sutherland , Elyse PerryElyse Perry , Phillip StrickerPhillip Stricker , Michael S. HofmanMichael S. Hofman , Veeru KasivisvanathanVeeru Kasivisvanathan , Matthew RobertsMatthew Roberts , and Declan MurphyDeclan Murphy View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004010AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Background: The PI-RADS score is standard of care for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnosis. The PRIMARY-score (PSMA-PET/CT) also has high diagnostic accuracy for csPCa. This study aimed to develop an easily calculated combined (P) score for csPCa detection (ISUP ≥ 2) incorporating separately read PI-RADS and PRIMARY scores, with external validation. Materials and Methods: Two datasets of men with suspected PCa, no prior biopsy, recent MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT, and subsequent trans-perineal biopsy were evaluated. The development sample (n = 291, 56% csPCa) a prospective trial and the validation sample (n = 227, 67% csPCa) a multi-centre retrospective database. Primary outcome was detection of csPCa (ISUP ≥ 2), with ISUP ≥ 3 cancer detection a secondary outcome. Score performance was evaluated by AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and decision curve analysis. Results: The 5-point combined (P) score was developed in a prospective dataset. In the validation dataset, csPCa was identified in 0%, 20%, 52%, 96% and 100% for P score 1 to 5. The AUC was 0.93 (95%CI: 0.90-0.96), higher than PI-RADS 0.89 (95%CI: 0.85-0.93, P = .039) and PRIMARY score alone 0.84 (95%CI: 0.79-0.89, P < .001). Splitting scores at 1/2 (negative) vs 3/4/5 (positive), P score sensitivity was 94% (95%CI: 89-97) compared to PI-RADS 89% (95%CI: 83-93) and PRIMARY score 86% (95%CI: 79-91). For ISUP ≥ 3, P score sensitivity was 99% (95%CI: 95-100) vs 94% (95%CI: 88-98) and 92% (95%CI: 85-97) for PI-RADS and PRIMARY scores respectively. An SUVmax > 12 (P score 5) was ISUP ≥ 2 in all cases with 93% ISUP ≥ 3. Conclusions: The P-score is easily calculated and improves accuracy for csPCa over both PI-RADS and PRIMARY scores. It should be considered when PSMA-PET is undertaken for diagnosis. © 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGalgano S and Rais-Bahrami S Editorial CommentJournal of Urology, Related articlesJournal of Urology17 May 2024Editorial Comment Supplementary Materials Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2024 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsmulti-parametric MRIPSMAprostate specific membrane antigenPETprostate cancerdiagnosisMetrics Author Information Louise Emmett Corresponding Author: Louise Emmett, Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney ( ([email protected]) ) More articles by this author Nathan Papa More articles by this author Thomas A. Hope More articles by this author Wolfgang Fendler More articles by this author Jeremie Calais More articles by this author Irene Burger More articles by this author Matthias Eiber More articles by this author Francesco Barbato More articles by this author Daniel Moon More articles by this author William Counter More articles by this author Nikeith John More articles by this author Alan Xue More articles by this author Anthony Franklin More articles by this author James Thompson More articles by this author Kris Rasiah More articles by this author Mark Frydenberg More articles by this author John Yaxley More articles by this author James Buteau More articles by this author Shikha Agrawal More articles by this author Bao Ho Corresponding Author: Louise Emmett, Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney ( ([email protected]) ) More articles by this author Andrew Nguyen More articles by this author Victor Liu More articles by this author Jonathan Lee More articles by this author Henry Woo More articles by this author Edward Hsiao More articles by this author Thomas Sutherland More articles by this author Elyse Perry More articles by this author Phillip Stricker More articles by this author Michael S. Hofman More articles by this author Veeru Kasivisvanathan More articles by this author Matthew Roberts More articles by this author Declan Murphy More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
完美世界应助344061512采纳,获得10
刚刚
于世不凡发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
东西南北完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Skye完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
joshar完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
白鸽鸽完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
wuwa应助哈哈哈哈哈采纳,获得10
2秒前
苹果酸奶完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
AD应助神秘面筋男采纳,获得10
2秒前
11111完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
汉堡包应助tfldog采纳,获得10
4秒前
顺利乐枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
善学以致用应助复杂含灵采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
FYm发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
cl完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
ZXT完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
韩十四完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
大模型应助NL采纳,获得10
10秒前
美满向薇发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
科研小肖完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
栾小鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
善学以致用应助StandardR采纳,获得10
11秒前
果粒橙爱学习完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Wcy发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
科科发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Handbook of Fuel Cells, 6 Volume Set 1666
Floxuridine; Third Edition 1000
Tracking and Data Fusion: A Handbook of Algorithms 1000
Sustainable Land Management: Strategies to Cope with the Marginalisation of Agriculture 800
消化器内視鏡関連の偶発症に関する第7回全国調査報告2019〜2021年までの3年間 500
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 500
Framing China: Media Images and Political Debates in Britain, the USA and Switzerland, 1900-1950 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 内科学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 冶金 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2861134
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2466480
关于积分的说明 6686911
捐赠科研通 2157612
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1146272
版权声明 585087
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 563193