The effectiveness of peer support interventions for community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

医学 心理干预 荟萃分析 物理疗法 相对风险 随机对照试验 严格标准化平均差 系统回顾 梅德林 置信区间 内科学 精神科 政治学 法学
作者
Monique V. Wilson,F BRAITHWAITE,John B. Arnold,S. Crouch,Emily Moore,Alrun M. Heil,Kay Cooper,Tasha R. Stanton
出处
期刊:Pain [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:165 (12): 2698-2720 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003293
摘要

This systematic review and meta-analysis critically examined the evidence for peer support interventions to reduce pain and improve health outcomes in community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain (PROSPERO CRD42022356850). A systematic search (inception-January 2023) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken to identify relevant randomised controlled trials, with risk of bias and GRADE assessments performed on included studies. Meta-analyses used a generic, inverse-variance, random-effects model, calculating mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Of 16,445 records identified, 29 records reporting on 24 studies (n = 6202 participants) were included. All evidence had unclear/high risk of bias and low-very low certainty. Peer support interventions resulted in small improvements in pain (medium-term: MD -3.48, 95% CI -6.61, -0.35; long-term: MD -1.97, 95% CI -3.53, -0.42), self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.16, 0.36; long-term: SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.07, 0.36), and function (long-term: SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.19, -0.00) relative to usual care and greater self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.20, 0.51) relative to waitlist control. Peer support interventions resulted in similar improvement as active (health professional led) interventions bar long-term self-efficacy (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.77, -0.05), which favoured active interventions. No point estimates reached minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Pooled health service utilisation outcomes showed unclear estimates. Self-management, quality of life, and social support outcomes had mixed evidence. Despite low-very low evidence certainty, peer support interventions demonstrated small improvements over usual care and waitlist controls for some clinical outcomes, suggesting that peer support may be useful as an adjunct to other treatments for musculoskeletal pain.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
xuxu完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
祥祥完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
qingxizhao发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
我看看怎么个事的应助被NONODFN采纳,获得30
1秒前
无花果的应助被Zzziihao采纳,获得10
1秒前
游泳的妙脆角完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
XIA发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Dylan完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
可爱的函函的应助被学海无涯采纳,获得10
2秒前
Sc0tt完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
paletll发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
gaga完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
骆驼完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
迅速的时光完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
神勇的博涛完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
000完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
今后的应助被郭天蓣采纳,获得10
5秒前
cc发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
小嗨歪歪关注了科研通微信公众号
5秒前
zzjjss完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Itazu完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
wang发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
何乾乾发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
leichen发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
清柠发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Hathaway完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
沉静小萱完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
东风压倒西风完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
zzh发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea De Guyane 2000
Narrative Disclosure and Earnings Performance: Evidence from R&D Disclosures 1050
Preparation and Properties of Cu-Plated Graphene/Cu Composites 1000
Essays on African writing: A re-evaluation 1000
内視鏡下経鼻経蝶形骨洞手術術後SIADHに対する予防的水制限の安全性と有効性の検討 1000
Problems and Solutions for Integer and Combinatorial Optimization: Building Skills in Discrete Optimization 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8004026
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9455762
关于积分的说明 21157205
捐赠科研通 7576846
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3381817
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2514701
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2416570