The effectiveness of peer support interventions for community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

医学 心理干预 荟萃分析 物理疗法 相对风险 随机对照试验 严格标准化平均差 系统回顾 梅德林 置信区间 内科学 精神科 政治学 法学
作者
Monique V. Wilson,F BRAITHWAITE,John B. Arnold,S. Crouch,Emily Moore,Alrun M. Heil,Kay Cooper,Tasha R. Stanton
出处
期刊:Pain [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:165 (12): 2698-2720 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003293
摘要

This systematic review and meta-analysis critically examined the evidence for peer support interventions to reduce pain and improve health outcomes in community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain (PROSPERO CRD42022356850). A systematic search (inception-January 2023) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken to identify relevant randomised controlled trials, with risk of bias and GRADE assessments performed on included studies. Meta-analyses used a generic, inverse-variance, random-effects model, calculating mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Of 16,445 records identified, 29 records reporting on 24 studies (n = 6202 participants) were included. All evidence had unclear/high risk of bias and low-very low certainty. Peer support interventions resulted in small improvements in pain (medium-term: MD -3.48, 95% CI -6.61, -0.35; long-term: MD -1.97, 95% CI -3.53, -0.42), self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.16, 0.36; long-term: SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.07, 0.36), and function (long-term: SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.19, -0.00) relative to usual care and greater self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.20, 0.51) relative to waitlist control. Peer support interventions resulted in similar improvement as active (health professional led) interventions bar long-term self-efficacy (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.77, -0.05), which favoured active interventions. No point estimates reached minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Pooled health service utilisation outcomes showed unclear estimates. Self-management, quality of life, and social support outcomes had mixed evidence. Despite low-very low evidence certainty, peer support interventions demonstrated small improvements over usual care and waitlist controls for some clinical outcomes, suggesting that peer support may be useful as an adjunct to other treatments for musculoskeletal pain.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
风笛发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Akim应助卷毛采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
称心的高丽完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
科研通AI6.3应助JHeart采纳,获得10
1秒前
longwang发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
所所应助海猫食堂采纳,获得10
3秒前
LJJ发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
蓝天发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Preseverance完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Zhidong Wei完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
尧九发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
hangzhen发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
忧伤的绍辉完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
深情安青应助Xue采纳,获得10
12秒前
完美世界应助李健课题组采纳,获得10
12秒前
隐形曼青应助空隙可欣采纳,获得10
12秒前
卷毛发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
亚亚发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
偷猫的鱼发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
CodeCraft应助张张采纳,获得10
13秒前
科研通AI6.4应助muluoyinhua采纳,获得10
14秒前
大个应助longwang采纳,获得10
14秒前
www完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
充电宝应助自信的梦之采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
拼搏的白玉完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
MiFkuF完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
yn完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
yjh123应助平常笑珊采纳,获得10
21秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Environmental Leverage in Times of Climate Crisis: Product Standards, Carbon Border Measures and Preferential Trade Agreements 1000
Erwählung und Berufung bei Paulus: Bedeutung, Entwicklung und Funktion einer Vorstellung in ihrem frühjüdischen und griechisch-römischen Kontext 850
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Structural Geology: A Quantitative Introduction 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7217323
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8848780
关于积分的说明 18673361
捐赠科研通 6873972
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3185378
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2347663
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2159696