The effectiveness of peer support interventions for community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

医学 心理干预 荟萃分析 物理疗法 相对风险 随机对照试验 严格标准化平均差 系统回顾 梅德林 置信区间 内科学 精神科 政治学 法学
作者
Monique V. Wilson,F BRAITHWAITE,John B. Arnold,S. Crouch,Emily Moore,Alrun M. Heil,Kay Cooper,Tasha R. Stanton
出处
期刊:Pain [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:165 (12): 2698-2720 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003293
摘要

This systematic review and meta-analysis critically examined the evidence for peer support interventions to reduce pain and improve health outcomes in community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain (PROSPERO CRD42022356850). A systematic search (inception-January 2023) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken to identify relevant randomised controlled trials, with risk of bias and GRADE assessments performed on included studies. Meta-analyses used a generic, inverse-variance, random-effects model, calculating mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Of 16,445 records identified, 29 records reporting on 24 studies (n = 6202 participants) were included. All evidence had unclear/high risk of bias and low-very low certainty. Peer support interventions resulted in small improvements in pain (medium-term: MD -3.48, 95% CI -6.61, -0.35; long-term: MD -1.97, 95% CI -3.53, -0.42), self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.16, 0.36; long-term: SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.07, 0.36), and function (long-term: SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.19, -0.00) relative to usual care and greater self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.20, 0.51) relative to waitlist control. Peer support interventions resulted in similar improvement as active (health professional led) interventions bar long-term self-efficacy (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.77, -0.05), which favoured active interventions. No point estimates reached minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Pooled health service utilisation outcomes showed unclear estimates. Self-management, quality of life, and social support outcomes had mixed evidence. Despite low-very low evidence certainty, peer support interventions demonstrated small improvements over usual care and waitlist controls for some clinical outcomes, suggesting that peer support may be useful as an adjunct to other treatments for musculoskeletal pain.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1Yueee发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
SAL发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Judd应助益安采纳,获得10
6秒前
8秒前
8秒前
小蘑菇应助流浪小诗人采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
FashionBoy应助SAL采纳,获得10
8秒前
亲爱的小肥羊们完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
特务兔完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
CFD应助只只采纳,获得20
11秒前
袁清洁完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
1823323145发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
李小强完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
tqs发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
16秒前
FreeWind发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
微笑凌晴完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
mONESY发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
激动的冰淇淋应助ning采纳,获得10
22秒前
Bab完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
老实天奇发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助向荣采纳,获得10
25秒前
ocean完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
mONESY完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
朝明发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
28秒前
29秒前
孤独雨梅完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
搜集达人应助wuyudi采纳,获得10
32秒前
勤劳傲安完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
xjh完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
美好斓发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
35秒前
好像是肥阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
眰恦完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Developing Genetic Editing Tools for Lysobacter 2000
卤化钙钛矿人工突触的研究 2000
Моделирование процессов самоорганизации в кристаллообразующих системах 1000
History of U.S. Space Surveillance and Satellite Cataloging 1000
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6519930
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8312900
关于积分的说明 17778183
捐赠科研通 5622068
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2926896
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1903825
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1764293