Influence of dosing pattern of antipsychotics on treatment outcome of delirium in patients with advanced cancer

谵妄 医学 加药 观察研究 剂量 不利影响 评定量表 置信区间 内科学 氯丙嗪 麻醉 重症监护医学 心理学 发展心理学
作者
Akiko Abe,Daisuke Fujisawa,Kaya Miyajima,Emi Takeuchi,Mika Takeuchi,Masaru Mimura,Kengo Imai,Keiichi Uemura,Hiroaki Watanabe,Naoki Matsuo,Yoshinobu Matsuda,Isseki Maeda,Asao Ogawa,Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi,Toru Okuyama
出处
期刊:Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:53 (4): 321-326
标识
DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyac205
摘要

Clinical guidelines recommend antipsychotics for the treatment of delirium; however, there has been no confirmed recommendation regarding their administrating patterns. This study aims to investigate whether different dosing patterns of antipsychotics (single or multiple administrations) influence the outcomes of delirium treatment.This is a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study involving patients with advanced cancer and delirium receiving antipsychotics. The Delirium Rating Scale Revised-98 was administered at baseline and after 72 h of starting pharmacotherapy. Patients were classified into single administration group (received a single dosage within 24 h before the assessment) and multiple administration group (received more than one dosage).A total of 555 patients (single administration 492 (88.6%); multiple administration 63 (11.4%)) were subjected to analyses. The patients in the multiple administration group were more likely to be male, in psycho-oncology consulting settings, with lower performance status, with hyperactive delirium and with severer delirium symptoms. In the multivariate analysis, single administration was significantly associated with better improvement of delirium (p < 0.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.83-5.87) even after controlling covariates. There were no significant differences in the mean dosages of antipsychotics per day in chlorpromazine equivalent (single administration 116.8 mg/day, multiple administration 123.5 mg/day) and the incidence of adverse events between the two groups.In this observational study sample, Delirium Rating Scale severity score improvement in single administration was higher than that seen in multiple administration. There was no difference in adverse events between the two groups.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
英姑应助sxad采纳,获得10
2秒前
dcdsdc完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
2秒前
喜白Q完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
renpp完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
淮辞发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
科研通AI2S应助Yangqx007采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
喜白Q发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
9秒前
深情安青应助dcdsdc采纳,获得10
9秒前
ABC发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
11秒前
温乐松发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
飞行模式发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
自然白风完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
DoLaso发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
赵宝正发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
科研通AI2S应助加菲采纳,获得10
16秒前
一一完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
ABC完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Jessie发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
小二郎应助DoLaso采纳,获得10
19秒前
zp发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
所所应助王双羊采纳,获得10
20秒前
桐桐应助余琳采纳,获得10
22秒前
英俊的铭应助xiaoshoujun采纳,获得10
22秒前
如意2023发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
wangbq发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
小蘑菇应助zp采纳,获得10
25秒前
奋斗向日葵完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
27秒前
高分求助中
rhetoric, logic and argumentation: a guide to student writers 1000
Cambridge introduction to intercultural communication 1000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
A Chronicle of Small Beer: The Memoirs of Nan Green 1000
Understanding Autism and Autistic Functioning 950
From Rural China to the Ivy League: Reminiscences of Transformations in Modern Chinese History 900
Eric Dunning and the Sociology of Sport 850
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 免疫学 细胞生物学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2915614
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2554443
关于积分的说明 6910937
捐赠科研通 2215813
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1177869
版权声明 588353
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 576535