Causal inference and counterfactual prediction in machine learning for actionable healthcare

反事实思维 因果推理 计算机科学 反事实条件 观察研究 人工智能 心理干预 机器学习 因果模型 风险分析(工程) 医学 数据科学 心理学 社会心理学 病理 精神科
作者
Mattia Prosperi,Yi Guo,Matthew Sperrin,James S. Koopman,Jae Min,Xing He,Shannan N. Rich,Mo Wang,Iain Buchan,Jiang Bian
出处
期刊:Nature Machine Intelligence [Nature Portfolio]
卷期号:2 (7): 369-375 被引量:395
标识
DOI:10.1038/s42256-020-0197-y
摘要

Big data, high-performance computing, and (deep) machine learning are increasingly becoming key to precision medicine—from identifying disease risks and taking preventive measures, to making diagnoses and personalizing treatment for individuals. Precision medicine, however, is not only about predicting risks and outcomes, but also about weighing interventions. Interventional clinical predictive models require the correct specification of cause and effect, and the calculation of so-called counterfactuals, that is, alternative scenarios. In biomedical research, observational studies are commonly affected by confounding and selection bias. Without robust assumptions, often requiring a priori domain knowledge, causal inference is not feasible. Data-driven prediction models are often mistakenly used to draw causal effects, but neither their parameters nor their predictions necessarily have a causal interpretation. Therefore, the premise that data-driven prediction models lead to trustable decisions/interventions for precision medicine is questionable. When pursuing intervention modelling, the bio-health informatics community needs to employ causal approaches and learn causal structures. Here we discuss how target trials (algorithmic emulation of randomized studies), transportability (the licence to transfer causal effects from one population to another) and prediction invariance (where a true causal model is contained in the set of all prediction models whose accuracy does not vary across different settings) are linchpins to developing and testing intervention models. Machine learning models are commonly used to predict risks and outcomes in biomedical research. But healthcare often requires information about cause–effect relations and alternative scenarios, that is, counterfactuals. Prosperi et al. discuss the importance of interventional and counterfactual models, as opposed to purely predictive models, in the context of precision medicine.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
快乐一江发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
丁爽发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
西瓜皮发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
微尘应助猜猜我是谁采纳,获得10
1秒前
汤圆呢醒醒完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
枫糖吐司应助因韦热爱采纳,获得10
1秒前
huanglanlan发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Areeha发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
student发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
薛潇发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
ycy发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
light完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
传奇3应助zhang采纳,获得10
4秒前
CipherSage应助锅巴采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
ww不迷糊完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
elivsZhou发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
张翊心发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
SciGPT应助111采纳,获得10
4秒前
长安发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
乐乐应助比巴卜采纳,获得10
4秒前
cxk完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
bkagyin应助冷静鱼采纳,获得10
5秒前
shaishai发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
light发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
思源应助大鱼不是大禹采纳,获得10
7秒前
一一一发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
小米应助快乐一江采纳,获得10
8秒前
善学以致用应助狗干采纳,获得10
8秒前
orixero应助王菲采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研通AI6.2应助伶俐问芙采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
TT完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
yk发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
鑫炜赵发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
高分求助中
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
Free parameter models in liquid scintillation counting 1000
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6303722
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8120393
关于积分的说明 17006300
捐赠科研通 5363438
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2848574
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1826015
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1679835