Causal inference and counterfactual prediction in machine learning for actionable healthcare

反事实思维 因果推理 计算机科学 反事实条件 观察研究 人工智能 心理干预 机器学习 因果模型 风险分析(工程) 医学 数据科学 心理学 社会心理学 病理 精神科
作者
Mattia Prosperi,Yi Guo,Matthew Sperrin,James S. Koopman,Jae Min,Xing He,Shannan N. Rich,Mo Wang,Iain Buchan,Jiang Bian
出处
期刊:Nature Machine Intelligence [Springer Nature]
卷期号:2 (7): 369-375 被引量:371
标识
DOI:10.1038/s42256-020-0197-y
摘要

Big data, high-performance computing, and (deep) machine learning are increasingly becoming key to precision medicine—from identifying disease risks and taking preventive measures, to making diagnoses and personalizing treatment for individuals. Precision medicine, however, is not only about predicting risks and outcomes, but also about weighing interventions. Interventional clinical predictive models require the correct specification of cause and effect, and the calculation of so-called counterfactuals, that is, alternative scenarios. In biomedical research, observational studies are commonly affected by confounding and selection bias. Without robust assumptions, often requiring a priori domain knowledge, causal inference is not feasible. Data-driven prediction models are often mistakenly used to draw causal effects, but neither their parameters nor their predictions necessarily have a causal interpretation. Therefore, the premise that data-driven prediction models lead to trustable decisions/interventions for precision medicine is questionable. When pursuing intervention modelling, the bio-health informatics community needs to employ causal approaches and learn causal structures. Here we discuss how target trials (algorithmic emulation of randomized studies), transportability (the licence to transfer causal effects from one population to another) and prediction invariance (where a true causal model is contained in the set of all prediction models whose accuracy does not vary across different settings) are linchpins to developing and testing intervention models. Machine learning models are commonly used to predict risks and outcomes in biomedical research. But healthcare often requires information about cause–effect relations and alternative scenarios, that is, counterfactuals. Prosperi et al. discuss the importance of interventional and counterfactual models, as opposed to purely predictive models, in the context of precision medicine.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
JamesPei应助YYY采纳,获得10
1秒前
曹大壮完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
背后中心发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
fuluyuzhe_668完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
烂漫夜梦完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
科研通AI6.2应助wandali采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
Kavin完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
南南东完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
qinyingxin应助一汪采纳,获得10
5秒前
skr完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
Tigher发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
科研通AI6.3应助zw0907采纳,获得10
7秒前
桐桐应助沙拉酱采纳,获得10
7秒前
科研通AI6.3应助健忘碧菡采纳,获得10
7秒前
玛卡巴卡完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
石榴完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
hui发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
冰柠檬完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
Lucas应助kk采纳,获得10
11秒前
13秒前
无极微光应助甜栗栗子采纳,获得20
13秒前
桐炫完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
石榴发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
科研通AI6.3应助Lorain采纳,获得10
15秒前
付榆峰发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
orixero应助cardiomyocytes采纳,获得20
15秒前
丁峰发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
小桔灯发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
一阳完成签到,获得积分0
17秒前
泰想成功完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
whale完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
吕半鬼完成签到,获得积分0
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5960868
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7211982
关于积分的说明 15957409
捐赠科研通 5097286
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2738884
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1701110
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1618983