Causal inference and counterfactual prediction in machine learning for actionable healthcare

反事实思维 因果推理 计算机科学 反事实条件 观察研究 人工智能 心理干预 机器学习 因果模型 风险分析(工程) 医学 数据科学 心理学 社会心理学 病理 精神科
作者
Mattia Prosperi,Yi Guo,Matthew Sperrin,James S. Koopman,Jae Min,Xing He,Shannan N. Rich,Mo Wang,Iain Buchan,Jiang Bian
出处
期刊:Nature Machine Intelligence [Nature Portfolio]
卷期号:2 (7): 369-375 被引量:395
标识
DOI:10.1038/s42256-020-0197-y
摘要

Big data, high-performance computing, and (deep) machine learning are increasingly becoming key to precision medicine—from identifying disease risks and taking preventive measures, to making diagnoses and personalizing treatment for individuals. Precision medicine, however, is not only about predicting risks and outcomes, but also about weighing interventions. Interventional clinical predictive models require the correct specification of cause and effect, and the calculation of so-called counterfactuals, that is, alternative scenarios. In biomedical research, observational studies are commonly affected by confounding and selection bias. Without robust assumptions, often requiring a priori domain knowledge, causal inference is not feasible. Data-driven prediction models are often mistakenly used to draw causal effects, but neither their parameters nor their predictions necessarily have a causal interpretation. Therefore, the premise that data-driven prediction models lead to trustable decisions/interventions for precision medicine is questionable. When pursuing intervention modelling, the bio-health informatics community needs to employ causal approaches and learn causal structures. Here we discuss how target trials (algorithmic emulation of randomized studies), transportability (the licence to transfer causal effects from one population to another) and prediction invariance (where a true causal model is contained in the set of all prediction models whose accuracy does not vary across different settings) are linchpins to developing and testing intervention models. Machine learning models are commonly used to predict risks and outcomes in biomedical research. But healthcare often requires information about cause–effect relations and alternative scenarios, that is, counterfactuals. Prosperi et al. discuss the importance of interventional and counterfactual models, as opposed to purely predictive models, in the context of precision medicine.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
大个应助哦1采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
夜雨清痕y发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
yuan发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
www发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
janice发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
yyh发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
蓝天发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
皎皎发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
科研小贩完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
虚幻白玉完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
manting发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
失落沙洲应助栗子采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
ding应助hjc采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
xinxin完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
6秒前
bodhi发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
虚幻白玉发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
dd完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
8秒前
儒雅的钢笔完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
科研通AI6.3应助樊焕焕采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
cesin完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
搜集达人应助Untitled采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
bkagyin应助酷酷妙柏采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
李雪蒙发布了新的文献求助20
11秒前
阿耐迪克应助hanny采纳,获得10
11秒前
赘婿应助windli采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
假不贾发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
高分求助中
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 3000
HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 106th edition 1000
ASPEN Adult Nutrition Support Core Curriculum, Fourth Edition 1000
Decentring Leadership 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
脑电大模型与情感脑机接口研究--郑伟龙 500
Genera Orchidacearum Volume 4: Epidendroideae, Part 1 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6288323
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8107013
关于积分的说明 16959088
捐赠科研通 5353385
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2844755
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1821935
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1678122