Causal inference and counterfactual prediction in machine learning for actionable healthcare

反事实思维 因果推理 计算机科学 反事实条件 观察研究 人工智能 心理干预 机器学习 因果模型 风险分析(工程) 医学 数据科学 心理学 社会心理学 病理 精神科
作者
Mattia Prosperi,Yi Guo,Matthew Sperrin,James S. Koopman,Jae Min,Xing He,Shannan N. Rich,Mo Wang,Iain Buchan,Jiang Bian
出处
期刊:Nature Machine Intelligence [Nature Portfolio]
卷期号:2 (7): 369-375 被引量:395
标识
DOI:10.1038/s42256-020-0197-y
摘要

Big data, high-performance computing, and (deep) machine learning are increasingly becoming key to precision medicine—from identifying disease risks and taking preventive measures, to making diagnoses and personalizing treatment for individuals. Precision medicine, however, is not only about predicting risks and outcomes, but also about weighing interventions. Interventional clinical predictive models require the correct specification of cause and effect, and the calculation of so-called counterfactuals, that is, alternative scenarios. In biomedical research, observational studies are commonly affected by confounding and selection bias. Without robust assumptions, often requiring a priori domain knowledge, causal inference is not feasible. Data-driven prediction models are often mistakenly used to draw causal effects, but neither their parameters nor their predictions necessarily have a causal interpretation. Therefore, the premise that data-driven prediction models lead to trustable decisions/interventions for precision medicine is questionable. When pursuing intervention modelling, the bio-health informatics community needs to employ causal approaches and learn causal structures. Here we discuss how target trials (algorithmic emulation of randomized studies), transportability (the licence to transfer causal effects from one population to another) and prediction invariance (where a true causal model is contained in the set of all prediction models whose accuracy does not vary across different settings) are linchpins to developing and testing intervention models. Machine learning models are commonly used to predict risks and outcomes in biomedical research. But healthcare often requires information about cause–effect relations and alternative scenarios, that is, counterfactuals. Prosperi et al. discuss the importance of interventional and counterfactual models, as opposed to purely predictive models, in the context of precision medicine.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
火星上夏岚完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
123完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
真真发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
豆Dora发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
独特酬海发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
绵绵冰完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
Lxxx完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
淡然冬灵应助梦白鸽采纳,获得20
8秒前
强健的仙人掌完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
vv123456ha发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
sha发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
11秒前
chen完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
pp1015发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
沉静达发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
YT发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
牛牛发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
许哆哆发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
大力的灵雁应助奇奇云采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
ash完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Akim应助Tammy采纳,获得30
17秒前
宋依依发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
隐形曼青应助开心的易巧采纳,获得10
20秒前
维斯完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
wanci应助sha采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
774发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
vobei完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Lewis’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Textbook Sixth Edition 2000
Wolffs Headache and Other Head Pain 9th Edition 1000
Continuing Syntax 1000
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Reference Work • Third edition • 2025 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
荧光膀胱镜诊治膀胱癌 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6221341
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8046374
关于积分的说明 16774298
捐赠科研通 5306784
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2827000
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1805188
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1664589