Causal inference and counterfactual prediction in machine learning for actionable healthcare

反事实思维 因果推理 计算机科学 反事实条件 观察研究 人工智能 心理干预 机器学习 因果模型 风险分析(工程) 医学 数据科学 心理学 社会心理学 病理 精神科
作者
Mattia Prosperi,Yi Guo,Matthew Sperrin,James S. Koopman,Jae Min,Xing He,Shannan N. Rich,Mo Wang,Iain Buchan,Jiang Bian
出处
期刊:Nature Machine Intelligence [Springer Nature]
卷期号:2 (7): 369-375 被引量:371
标识
DOI:10.1038/s42256-020-0197-y
摘要

Big data, high-performance computing, and (deep) machine learning are increasingly becoming key to precision medicine—from identifying disease risks and taking preventive measures, to making diagnoses and personalizing treatment for individuals. Precision medicine, however, is not only about predicting risks and outcomes, but also about weighing interventions. Interventional clinical predictive models require the correct specification of cause and effect, and the calculation of so-called counterfactuals, that is, alternative scenarios. In biomedical research, observational studies are commonly affected by confounding and selection bias. Without robust assumptions, often requiring a priori domain knowledge, causal inference is not feasible. Data-driven prediction models are often mistakenly used to draw causal effects, but neither their parameters nor their predictions necessarily have a causal interpretation. Therefore, the premise that data-driven prediction models lead to trustable decisions/interventions for precision medicine is questionable. When pursuing intervention modelling, the bio-health informatics community needs to employ causal approaches and learn causal structures. Here we discuss how target trials (algorithmic emulation of randomized studies), transportability (the licence to transfer causal effects from one population to another) and prediction invariance (where a true causal model is contained in the set of all prediction models whose accuracy does not vary across different settings) are linchpins to developing and testing intervention models. Machine learning models are commonly used to predict risks and outcomes in biomedical research. But healthcare often requires information about cause–effect relations and alternative scenarios, that is, counterfactuals. Prosperi et al. discuss the importance of interventional and counterfactual models, as opposed to purely predictive models, in the context of precision medicine.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
ghx应助Ryan采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
hh完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
酷酷的耷发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科目三应助风中的天菱采纳,获得10
4秒前
脑洞疼应助刘大大采纳,获得10
4秒前
小蘑菇应助123采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
诺796完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
华仔应助Li采纳,获得10
5秒前
活力的冬云完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
迷路沛珊发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
dio完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
真实的豆芽完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
酷酷的耷发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
芋圆完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
小番茄完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
云霓完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
船锚在玉龙雪山完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
我爱科研完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
芒果不忙发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
TIGA发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
传奇3应助生动的保温杯采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
YANYAN发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
不可以虫鸣吗我是大聪明完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Principles of town planning : translating concepts to applications 500
Short-Wavelength Infrared Windows for Biomedical Applications 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6061242
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7893586
关于积分的说明 16305808
捐赠科研通 5205073
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2784678
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1767284
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1647359