Causal inference and counterfactual prediction in machine learning for actionable healthcare

反事实思维 因果推理 计算机科学 反事实条件 观察研究 人工智能 心理干预 机器学习 因果模型 风险分析(工程) 医学 数据科学 心理学 社会心理学 病理 精神科
作者
Mattia Prosperi,Yi Guo,Matthew Sperrin,James S. Koopman,Jae Min,Xing He,Shannan N. Rich,Mo Wang,Iain Buchan,Jiang Bian
出处
期刊:Nature Machine Intelligence [Nature Portfolio]
卷期号:2 (7): 369-375 被引量:395
标识
DOI:10.1038/s42256-020-0197-y
摘要

Big data, high-performance computing, and (deep) machine learning are increasingly becoming key to precision medicine—from identifying disease risks and taking preventive measures, to making diagnoses and personalizing treatment for individuals. Precision medicine, however, is not only about predicting risks and outcomes, but also about weighing interventions. Interventional clinical predictive models require the correct specification of cause and effect, and the calculation of so-called counterfactuals, that is, alternative scenarios. In biomedical research, observational studies are commonly affected by confounding and selection bias. Without robust assumptions, often requiring a priori domain knowledge, causal inference is not feasible. Data-driven prediction models are often mistakenly used to draw causal effects, but neither their parameters nor their predictions necessarily have a causal interpretation. Therefore, the premise that data-driven prediction models lead to trustable decisions/interventions for precision medicine is questionable. When pursuing intervention modelling, the bio-health informatics community needs to employ causal approaches and learn causal structures. Here we discuss how target trials (algorithmic emulation of randomized studies), transportability (the licence to transfer causal effects from one population to another) and prediction invariance (where a true causal model is contained in the set of all prediction models whose accuracy does not vary across different settings) are linchpins to developing and testing intervention models. Machine learning models are commonly used to predict risks and outcomes in biomedical research. But healthcare often requires information about cause–effect relations and alternative scenarios, that is, counterfactuals. Prosperi et al. discuss the importance of interventional and counterfactual models, as opposed to purely predictive models, in the context of precision medicine.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
ZZZ完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
lhq发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
麻喽发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
ChrisKim完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
天天快乐应助zyyzyyoo采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
思源应助YanqiZhang采纳,获得10
6秒前
青筠发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
淡淡的芒果发布了新的文献求助100
7秒前
H1lb2rt发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
记得早睡完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
在水一方应助JinpengWang采纳,获得10
8秒前
ZZZ发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
lu完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
上官若男应助何相逢采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
齐媛媛完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
丘比特应助真空猪猪侠采纳,获得20
13秒前
14秒前
笑舞千叶完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
坚强砖家完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
WHC完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
坚强砖家发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
YanqiZhang发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
竹本完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
852应助陈陈陈采纳,获得10
22秒前
23秒前
Jasper应助无敌大裤衩采纳,获得10
23秒前
lpp_完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
天天快乐应助小芳采纳,获得10
25秒前
Lin.隽发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
29秒前
29秒前
科研通AI2S应助小心翼翼采纳,获得10
29秒前
勤恳飞珍完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Applied Min-Max Approach to Missile Guidance and Control 3000
Inorganic Chemistry Eighth Edition 1200
Free parameter models in liquid scintillation counting 1000
Standards for Molecular Testing for Red Cell, Platelet, and Neutrophil Antigens, 7th edition 1000
The Organic Chemistry of Biological Pathways Second Edition 800
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6318239
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8134406
关于积分的说明 17052134
捐赠科研通 5373111
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2852211
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1830131
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1681784