Feature tracking for assessment of diastolic function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

•Circumferential early diastolic strain rate(DSR) can identify diastolic dysfunction •Circumferential DSR can better identify diastolic dysfunction than phase contrast •Circumferential DSR is obtained via routine LV contours for volumes and function Aim To assess the agreement of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) feature-tracking (FT) parameters with echocardiography to diagnose diastolic dysfunction; to determine whether a similar parameter to mitral inflow early diastolic velocity to early diastolic tissue velocity ratio (E/e') can increase accuracy of imaging by dividing the phase contrast (PC) mitral inflow E-wave (E) with a CMRI-FT parameter; to compare the agreement between CMRI-FT and PC diastolic function assessment using echocardiography. Materials and methods Patients (n=71; 43 abnormal diastolic function) undergoing both CMRI and echocardiography independently were included. Echocardiography was the reference standard. CMRI-FT analysed the short and long axis cine contours. PC images of mitral inflow, tissue velocity, pulmonary vein flow, and left atrial area were assessed. Results Using CMRI-FT, the area under the curve (AUC) for identifying diastolic dysfunction was >0.80 for radial and circumferential strain, systolic strain rate (SSR), and early diastolic strain rate (DSR). For cases with CMRI-determined left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% (n=38), circumferential DSR was the only parameter with good accuracy (AUC=0.87; cut-off 0.93/s). E/circumferential DSR ratio and longitudinal strain had high accuracy in all patients (AUC=0.88 and 0.93 respectively) and CMRI-determined LVEF ≥50% (AUC=0.81; cut-off 76.7). Circumferential DSR showed the highest agreement with echocardiography (higher than E/circumferential DSR and PC assessment) in all cases (kappa 0.75; p<0001) and cases with CMRI LVEF ≥50% (kappa 0.73; p<0.0001). Conclusions CMRI-FT circumferential DSR showed the highest accuracy for determining diastolic dysfunction with good agreement with echocardiography. Circumferential DSR had higher accuracy than E/circumferential DSR and PC. To assess the agreement of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) feature-tracking (FT) parameters with echocardiography to diagnose diastolic dysfunction; to determine whether a similar parameter to mitral inflow early diastolic velocity to early diastolic tissue velocity ratio (E/e') can increase accuracy of imaging by dividing the phase contrast (PC) mitral inflow E-wave (E) with a CMRI-FT parameter; to compare the agreement between CMRI-FT and PC diastolic function assessment using echocardiography. Patients (n=71; 43 abnormal diastolic function) undergoing both CMRI and echocardiography independently were included. Echocardiography was the reference standard. CMRI-FT analysed the short and long axis cine contours. PC images of mitral inflow, tissue velocity, pulmonary vein flow, and left atrial area were assessed. Using CMRI-FT, the area under the curve (AUC) for identifying diastolic dysfunction was >0.80 for radial and circumferential strain, systolic strain rate (SSR), and early diastolic strain rate (DSR). For cases with CMRI-determined left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% (n=38), circumferential DSR was the only parameter with good accuracy (AUC=0.87; cut-off 0.93/s). E/circumferential DSR ratio and longitudinal strain had high accuracy in all patients (AUC=0.88 and 0.93 respectively) and CMRI-determined LVEF ≥50% (AUC=0.81; cut-off 76.7). Circumferential DSR showed the highest agreement with echocardiography (higher than E/circumferential DSR and PC assessment) in all cases (kappa 0.75; p<0001) and cases with CMRI LVEF ≥50% (kappa 0.73; p<0.0001). CMRI-FT circumferential DSR showed the highest accuracy for determining diastolic dysfunction with good agreement with echocardiography. Circumferential DSR had higher accuracy than E/circumferential DSR and PC.