Utilization and validation of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM): A scoping review

医学 人体测量学 营养不良 梅德林 儿科 病理 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
María Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia,Kelly A. Tappenden,Ainsley Malone,Carla M. Prado,David C. Evans,Abby C. Sauer,Refaat Hegazi,Leah Gramlich
出处
期刊:Clinical Nutrition [Elsevier]
卷期号:41 (3): 687-697 被引量:56
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.018
摘要

The diagnosis of malnutrition remains a significant challenge despite various published diagnostic criteria. In 2018, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) published a set of evidence-based criteria as a framework for malnutrition diagnosis in adults. A scoping review was conducted to understand how the GLIM criteria have been used in published literature and compare the reported validation methods to published validation guidance.Dialog and Dimensions databases were searched by publication date (January 1, 2019, through January 29, 2021). Data were extracted and mapped to the research objectives.Seventy-nine studies were reviewed; 32% were in patients at least 65 years of age; 67% occurred in hospitals. The majority were cohort studies (61%). Fifty-seven percent employed all 5 GLIM criteria. Regarding phenotypic criteria, 92% used low BMI, and 45% applied anthropometry as a marker for muscle mass, of which 54% used calf circumference. Regarding etiologic criteria, 72% used reduced food intake/assimilation, and 85% applied inflammation/disease burden. Validation of GLIM criteria was described in 77% of publications.The GLIM criteria have been studied extensively since their publication. Low BMI was the phenotypic criterion used most often, whereas both reduced food intake/assimilation and inflammation/disease burden were frequently employed as the etiologic criteria. However, how the criteria were combined and how validation was conducted were not clear in most studies. Adequately powered, methodologically sound validation studies using the complete GLIM criteria are needed in various patient populations and disease settings to assess validity for the diagnosis of malnutrition.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Lucas应助娇气的雁兰采纳,获得10
刚刚
国郭完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
Nicho发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
yyyyyyy完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Akim应助优雅沛文采纳,获得10
3秒前
yuHS发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
鱼鱼发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
啊哈哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
yyyyyyy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
马可博发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
zxj完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
邓艳梅完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
zhikaiyici完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
zxj发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
阔达幻丝完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
wxy发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
fhlwft完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
叨叨发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
怡然的芯完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
mermaid完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
马绍清完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
薰硝壤应助麦子采纳,获得10
15秒前
martiniwine发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
805完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
沉默的皮卡丘完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
Yang22完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
桐桐应助mermaid采纳,获得10
19秒前
寻绿完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
无限数据线完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
좌파는 어떻게 좌파가 됐나:한국 급진노동운동의 형성과 궤적 2500
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 1500
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
CLSI EP47 Evaluation of Reagent Carryover Effects on Test Results, 1st Edition 800
Threaded Harmony: A Sustainable Approach to Fashion 799
Livre et militantisme : La Cité éditeur 1958-1967 500
Retention of title in secured transactions law from a creditor's perspective: A comparative analysis of selected (non-)functional approaches 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3054296
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2711314
关于积分的说明 7425526
捐赠科研通 2355866
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1247387
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 606407
版权声明 596048