多光谱图像
均方误差
精准农业
天蓬
传感器融合
含水量
计算机科学
人工神经网络
遥感
RGB颜色模型
人工智能
随机森林
机器学习
环境科学
数学
统计
工程类
地理
考古
岩土工程
农业
作者
Minghan Cheng,Xiyun Jiao,Yadong Liu,Mingchao Shao,Xun Yu,Yi Bai,Zixu Wang,Siyu Wang,Nuremanguli Tuohuti,Shuaibing Liu,Lei Shi,Dameng Yin,Xiao Huang,Chaoqun Nie,Xiuliang Jin
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107530
摘要
An accurate in-field estimate of soil moisture content (SMC) is critical for precision irrigation management. Current ground methods to measure SMC were limited by the disadvantages of small-scale monitoring and high cost. The development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platforms now provides a cost-effective means for measuring SMC on a large scale. However, previous studies have considered only single-sensor estimates of SMC, so the combination of multiple sensors has yet to be thoroughly discussed. Additionally, the way in which soil depth, canopy coverage, and crop cultivars affect the SMC-estimation accuracy remains unclear. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the SMC-estimation accuracy provided by multimodal data fusion and four machine learning algorithms: partial least squares regression, K nearest neighbor, random forest regression (RFR), and backpropagation neural network (BPNN); (2) discuss the accuracy of the remote-sensing approach for estimating SMC at different soil depths, and (3) explore how canopy coverage and crop cultivars affect the accuracy of SMC estimation. The following results were obtained: (1) Data from multispectral sensors provided the most accurate SMC estimates regardless of which of the four machine learning algorithms was used. (2) Multimodal data fusion improved the SMC estimation accuracy, especially when combining multispectral and thermal data. (3) The RFR algorithm provided more accurate SMC estimates than the other three algorithms, with the highest accuracy obtained by combining data from RGB, multispectral, and thermal sensors with an R2 = 0.78 (0.78) and a relative root-mean-square error of 11.2% (9.6%) for 10-cm-deep (20-cm-deep) soil. (4) UAV-based SMC-estimation methods provided similar, stable performance for SMC estimates at various depths and even yielded smaller relative error for deeper estimates (20 cm). (5) The RFR and BPNN machine learning algorithms both provided relatively accurate SMC estimates for modest canopy coverage (0.2–0.4) but relatively poor estimates for higher (>0.4) or lower (<0.2) canopy coverage. (6) The SMC-estimation accuracy for different maize cultivars (JNK728 and ZD958) did not differ significantly (P < 0.01). These results indicate that UAV-based multimodal data fusion combined with machine learning algorithms can provide relatively accurate and repeatable SMC estimates. This approach can thus be used to monitor SMC and design precision irrigation systems.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI