Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes From a Trial of Three Limus-Eluting Stents With Different Polymer Coatings in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

医学 冠状动脉疾病 支架 心肌梗塞 心脏病学 内科学 西罗莫司 靶病变 外科 血栓形成 药物洗脱支架 依维莫司 不利影响 再狭窄 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
作者
Sebastian Kufner,Michael Joner,Anna Thannheimer,Petra Hoppmann,Tareq Ibrahim,Katharina Mayer,Salvatore Cassese,Karl‐Ludwig Laugwitz,Heribert Schunkert,Adnan Kastrati,Robert A. Byrne
出处
期刊:Circulation [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:139 (3): 325-333 被引量:114
标识
DOI:10.1161/circulationaha.118.038065
摘要

New-generation drug-eluting stents offer the potential for enhanced late outcomes in comparison with early generation drug-eluting stents. However, assessment of extended long-term outcomes for these devices is lacking, especially regarding the comparison between new-generation drug-eluting stents with biodegradable or permanent polymers. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES; Yukon Choice PC) versus permanent polymer-based everolimus-eluting stents (PP-EES; Xience) versus early generation permanent polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents (PP-SES; Cypher) at 10-year follow-up.Overall, 2603 patients were randomized to treatment with BP-SES (n=1299), PP-EES (n=652), or PP-SES (n=652). The primary end point of this analysis was major adverse cardiac event, the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. The main secondary end point of interest was definite/probable stent thrombosis. Follow-up at 10 years was available in 83% of the study patients.The 10-year incidence of major adverse cardiac event (BP-SES 47.7% versus PP-EES 46.0% versus PP-SES 54.9%, P=0.003) and mortality (BP-SES 31.8% versus PP-EES 30.3% versus PP-SES 37.2%, P=0.02) was different among the groups. Definite/probable stent thrombosis was not significantly different among the groups (BP-SES 1.8% versus PP-EES 2.5% versus PP-SES 3.7%, P=0.09). Definite stent thrombosis was significantly different among the groups (BP-SES 1.1% versus PP-EES 0.8% versus PP-SES 2.4%, P=0.03). There were no significant differences between BP-SES and PP-EES.In this unique long-term outcome analysis, BP-SES and PP-EES showed comparable clinical outcomes out to 10 years. PP-SES had higher rates of major adverse cardiac events and definite stent thrombosis.URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00598676.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
VDC应助kingwill采纳,获得30
2秒前
小章鱼完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
善学以致用应助MW科研人采纳,获得10
3秒前
诺之发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
lpj发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
4秒前
dadadaniu发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
黄金矿工发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
蔡蔡蔡发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
诚心小海豚完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
西西发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
华仔应助人间采纳,获得10
8秒前
高贵怀蕾发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
8秒前
三金完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
76完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
活力元珊完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
追寻绮彤发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
任性笑寒发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
大晨完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
小尹同学发布了新的文献求助20
12秒前
13秒前
情怀应助尹基忠采纳,获得30
13秒前
洲之轨迹发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
hbjadekylin给hbjadekylin的求助进行了留言
15秒前
张老师发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
脆脆发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
QZ完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
Lucas应助nobeliumer采纳,获得10
17秒前
高分求助中
Aspects of Babylonian celestial divination : the lunar eclipse tablets of enuma anu enlil 1500
Hopemont Capacity Assessment Interview manual and scoring guide 1000
Classics in Total Synthesis IV: New Targets, Strategies, Methods 1000
Mantids of the euro-mediterranean area 600
Mantodea of the World: Species Catalog Andrew M 500
Insecta 2. Blattodea, Mantodea, Isoptera, Grylloblattodea, Phasmatodea, Dermaptera and Embioptera 500
The Oxford Handbook of Transcranial Stimulation (the second edition) 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 纳米技术 内科学 物理 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3438077
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3034979
关于积分的说明 8956792
捐赠科研通 2723013
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1493684
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 690347
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 686758