A Three-Way Accuracy Comparison of the Dexcom G5, Abbott Freestyle Libre Pro, and Senseonics Eversense CGM Devices in an Outpatient Study of Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes

连续血糖监测 医学 人工胰腺 1型糖尿病 统计显著性 门诊部 糖尿病 平均差 数学 统计 内科学 内分泌学 置信区间
作者
Rabab Jafri,Courtney A. Balliro,Firas H. El-Khatib,MICHELE MAHENO,Mallory Hillard,ALEXANDER J. O'DONOVAN,Rajendranath Selagamsetty,Hui Zheng,Edward R. Damiano,Steven Russell
出处
期刊:Diabetes [American Diabetes Association]
卷期号:67 (Supplement_1) 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.2337/db18-14-or
摘要

There are no published studies directly comparing the accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices in the outpatient setting. We tested the performance of the Dexcom G5, Abbot Freestyle Libre Pro, and Senseonics Eversense (an implantable CGM approved in Europe) during a 6-week, free-living, outpatient bionic pancreas study involving 23 subjects with type 1 diabetes who wore all 3 devices concomitantly. The primary outcome was the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) vs. plasma glucose (PG) values measured with the Nova Biomedical StatStrip Xpress meter that was also used for calibrations according to the manufacturer's instruction (except for Libre Pro that is not calibrated). We compared PG values with CGM readings when they were available from all 3 CGMS in the 5 minutes preceding the PG values (n=829 sets). Since the Libre Pro records readings every 15 minutes, we also did a two-way comparison between the G5 and the Eversense that allowed a higher number of comparisons (n=2277 sets). Statistical significance was determined using a repeated measurements model fitted with the generalized estimating equation method. All 3 CGM systems produced higher average MARDs than during in-clinic studies. However, since all three CGM systems were worn by the same individuals and used the same meter for calibration and as comparator, we were able to directly compare their performance under real-world conditions. In the 3-way comparison Eversense achieved the lowest nominal MARD (14.8%) followed by Dexcom G5 (16.3%) and Libre Pro (18.0%) (Eversense vs. Libre Pro p=0.004, other comparisons p=NS). In the 2-way comparison the MARD difference between Eversense (15.1%) and G5 (16.9%) was statistically significant (p=0.008). We found that the point accuracy of the Eversense was significantly better than two other CGM systems. The Eversense CGM system may be useful to provide glucose values to artificial pancreas devices. Disclosure R.Z. Jafri: None. C.A. Balliro: None. F. El-Khatib: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Beta Bionics. Employee; Self; Beta Bionics. M. Maheno: None. M.A. Hillard: None. A.J. O'Donovan: None. R. Selagamsetty: None. H. Zheng: None. E. Damiano: Other Relationship; Self; Beta Bionics. S.J. Russell: Other Relationship; Self; Beta Bionics, Novo Nordisk Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Companion Medical, Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., Unomedical a/s. Research Support; Self; Beta Bionics, Zealand Pharma A/S, MITRE Corporation.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
Hello应助羽07采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
潇潇雨歇发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
桐桐应助大方的忻采纳,获得10
4秒前
英俊的铭应助Dave采纳,获得10
5秒前
welch发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
ccciii发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
隐形的映菱完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
wcwzcz完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
韦明凯完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
草莓熊发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
seven发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
潇潇雨歇发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
星辰大海应助welch采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
ksjj发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
FashionBoy应助kk采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
zhang完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
斯文败类应助没在清醒采纳,获得10
15秒前
Leonardi应助Nuclear采纳,获得200
15秒前
小马能发sci完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
潇潇雨歇发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
18秒前
香蕉觅云应助兴奋的香芦采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
diu完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
坚强的严青应助xff采纳,获得30
22秒前
忧虑的真发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
大方的忻发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
China's Relations With Japan 1945-83: The Role of Liao Chengzhi 400
Classics in Total Synthesis IV 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3148072
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2799096
关于积分的说明 7833514
捐赠科研通 2456285
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1307194
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 628077
版权声明 601655