Automated Calculation of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score: Feasibility and Reliability

医学 神经放射学家 冲程(发动机) 闭塞 回顾性队列研究 大脑中动脉 放射科 急性中风 队列 外科 磁共振成像 内科学 缺血 机械工程 工程类 组织纤溶酶原激活剂
作者
Christian Maegerlein,Johanna C. Fischer,Sebastian Mönch,Maria Berndt,Silke Wunderlich,Christian Seifert,Manuel Lehm,Tobias Boeckh‐Behrens,Claus Zimmer,Benjamin Friedrich
出处
期刊:Radiology [Radiological Society of North America]
卷期号:291 (1): 141-148 被引量:113
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.2019181228
摘要

Background The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) evaluation is a qualitative method to evaluate focal hypoattenuation at brain CT in early acute stroke. However, interobserver agreement is only moderate. Purpose To compare ASPECTS calculated by using an automatic software tool to neuroradiologist evaluation in the setting of acute stroke. Materials and Methods For this retrospective study, consensus ASPECTS were defined by two neuroradiologists based on baseline noncontrast CTs collected from January 2017 to December 2017 from patients with an occlusion in the middle cerebral artery and from an additional cohort of patients suspected of having stroke and no large vessel occlusion. Imaging data from both baseline and follow-up CT was evaluated for the consensus reading. After 6 weeks, the same two neuroradiologists again determined ASPECTS by using only the baseline CT. For comparison, ASPECTS was also calculated from baseline CT images by using a commercially available software (RAPID ASPECTS). Both methods were compared by using weighted κ statistics. Results CT scans from 100 patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion (44 women [mean age ± standard deviation, 75 years ± 14] and 56 men [mean age, 71 years ± 14]) and 52 patients suspected of having stroke and no large vessel occlusion (19 women [mean age, 69 years ± 18] and 33 men [68 years ± 15]) were evaluated. Neuroradiologists showed moderate agreement with the consensus score (κ = 0.57 and κ = 0.56). Software analysis showed substantial agreement (κ = 0.9) with the consensus score. Software analysis showed a substantial agreement (κ = 0.78) after greater than 1 hour between symptom onset and imaging, which increased to high agreement (κ = 0.92) in the time window greater than 4 hours. The neuroradiologist raters did not achieve comparable results to the software until the time interval of greater than 4 hours (κ = 0.83 and κ = 0.76). Conclusion In acute stroke of the middle cerebral artery, the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score calculated with automated software had better agreement than that of human readers with a predefined consensus score. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
肉胖胖肉完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
领导范儿应助笨蛋研究生采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
ycool完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
爱猫的纭完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
biotnt发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
赘婿应助hilda采纳,获得10
1秒前
Jasper应助土狗采纳,获得10
1秒前
卓一曲发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
lx完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
老德发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
大晨发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
QQWQEQRQ发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
山楂看海完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
森眸发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
大模型应助大冰采纳,获得100
3秒前
Unicorn发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
CodeCraft应助典雅的俊驰采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
Sissi完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
lx发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
常常应助诗诗采纳,获得10
5秒前
sunday完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
呼噜噜完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
强健的电源完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
Yangzx完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
eve发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
独特板栗发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
大模型应助GEMINI采纳,获得20
7秒前
Lucas应助是真的宇航员啊采纳,获得10
7秒前
biotnt完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
尼斯卡完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
哟哟哟完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
西营完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
高分求助中
Licensing Deals in Pharmaceuticals 2019-2024 3000
Cognitive Paradigms in Knowledge Organisation 2000
Effect of reactor temperature on FCC yield 2000
Introduction to Spectroscopic Ellipsometry of Thin Film Materials Instrumentation, Data Analysis, and Applications 1200
How Maoism Was Made: Reconstructing China, 1949-1965 800
Medical technology industry in China 600
中国内窥镜润滑剂行业市场占有率及投资前景预测分析报告 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3311586
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2944410
关于积分的说明 8518837
捐赠科研通 2619769
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1432582
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 664704
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 649969