Screening tests for aphasia in patients with stroke: a systematic review

失语症 致盲 冲程(发动机) 医学 考试(生物学) 神经学 荟萃分析 物理疗法 梅德林 随机对照试验 精神科 外科 内科学 政治学 机械工程 生物 工程类 古生物学 法学
作者
Hanane El Hachioui,Evy Visch‐Brink,Lonneke M.L. de Lau,Mieke W.M.E. van de Sandt-Koenderman,Femke Nouwens,Peter J. Koudstaal,Diederik W.J. Dippel
出处
期刊:Journal of Neurology [Springer Nature]
卷期号:264 (2): 211-220 被引量:87
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00415-016-8170-8
摘要

Aphasia has a large impact on the quality of life and adds significantly to the costs of stroke care. Early recognition of aphasia in stroke patients is important for prognostication and well-timed treatment planning. We aimed to identify available screening tests for differentiating between aphasic and non-aphasic stroke patients, and to evaluate test accuracy, reliability, and feasibility. We searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO for published studies on screening tests aimed at assessing aphasia in stroke patients. The reference lists of the selected articles were scanned, and several experts were contacted to detect additional references. Of each screening test, we estimated the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio of a positive test, likelihood ratio of a negative test, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and rated the degree of bias of the validation method. We included ten studies evaluating eight screening tests. There was a large variation across studies regarding sample size, patient characteristics, and reference tests used for validation. Many papers failed to report on the consecutiveness of patient inclusion, time between aphasia onset and administration of the screening test, and blinding. Of the three studies that were rated as having an intermediate or low risk of bias, the DOR was highest for the Language Screening Test and ScreeLing. Several screening tools for aphasia in stroke are available, but many tests have not been verified properly. Methodologically sound validation studies of aphasia screening tests are needed to determine their usefulness in clinical practice.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
美味的薯片完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
Accepted应助875728314采纳,获得10
刚刚
Joey完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
无私尔风发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
北侨发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
小饼干发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
卢西奥发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Akim应助北侨采纳,获得30
8秒前
李健应助xx采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
小雷发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
shanchuan发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
小草三心发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
qujinzhi完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
17秒前
科研通AI2S应助shanchuan采纳,获得10
18秒前
田様应助大大小小采纳,获得10
18秒前
洛洛完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
汉堡包应助整齐凌萱采纳,获得10
19秒前
Annie发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
Ava应助sfxnxgu采纳,获得10
22秒前
22秒前
过时的冰菱完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
大力荷花完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
勤奋千风完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
赘婿应助滴滴滴滴采纳,获得10
26秒前
26秒前
27秒前
不舍天真发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
xx完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
科研修沟发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
高分求助中
Kinetics of the Esterification Between 2-[(4-hydroxybutoxy)carbonyl] Benzoic Acid with 1,4-Butanediol: Tetrabutyl Orthotitanate as Catalyst 1000
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
Rechtsphilosophie 1000
Handbook of Qualitative Cross-Cultural Research Methods 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3139150
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2790122
关于积分的说明 7793698
捐赠科研通 2446483
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1301209
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 626124
版权声明 601102