Screening tests for aphasia in patients with stroke: a systematic review

失语症 致盲 冲程(发动机) 医学 考试(生物学) 神经学 荟萃分析 物理疗法 梅德林 随机对照试验 精神科 外科 内科学 政治学 机械工程 生物 工程类 古生物学 法学
作者
Hanane El Hachioui,Evy Visch‐Brink,Lonneke M.L. de Lau,Mieke W.M.E. van de Sandt-Koenderman,Femke Nouwens,Peter J. Koudstaal,Diederik W.J. Dippel
出处
期刊:Journal of Neurology [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:264 (2): 211-220 被引量:87
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00415-016-8170-8
摘要

Aphasia has a large impact on the quality of life and adds significantly to the costs of stroke care. Early recognition of aphasia in stroke patients is important for prognostication and well-timed treatment planning. We aimed to identify available screening tests for differentiating between aphasic and non-aphasic stroke patients, and to evaluate test accuracy, reliability, and feasibility. We searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO for published studies on screening tests aimed at assessing aphasia in stroke patients. The reference lists of the selected articles were scanned, and several experts were contacted to detect additional references. Of each screening test, we estimated the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio of a positive test, likelihood ratio of a negative test, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and rated the degree of bias of the validation method. We included ten studies evaluating eight screening tests. There was a large variation across studies regarding sample size, patient characteristics, and reference tests used for validation. Many papers failed to report on the consecutiveness of patient inclusion, time between aphasia onset and administration of the screening test, and blinding. Of the three studies that were rated as having an intermediate or low risk of bias, the DOR was highest for the Language Screening Test and ScreeLing. Several screening tools for aphasia in stroke are available, but many tests have not been verified properly. Methodologically sound validation studies of aphasia screening tests are needed to determine their usefulness in clinical practice.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
鱼儿完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
入江直熠完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
科研小崩豆完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
迟大猫应助yoozii采纳,获得10
3秒前
21发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
火星上问芙完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
嘻嘻发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
diode完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
ghroth完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
小二郎应助鱼儿采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
自然彤发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Sharon完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Jasper应助火星上问芙采纳,获得10
8秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助ZJPPPP采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
怕黑行恶完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
小二郎应助哭泣的犀牛采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
科研通AI5应助一只杨采纳,获得10
13秒前
湖蓝色发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
爱听歌的白开水完成签到 ,获得积分20
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
科研通AI5应助故意的烧鹅采纳,获得10
18秒前
没什么想说的完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
21秒前
王情水发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
23秒前
湖蓝色完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
lynh0508发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
南逸然完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
29秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Ophthalmic Equipment Market 1500
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
いちばんやさしい生化学 500
Genre and Graduate-Level Research Writing 500
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3673961
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3229371
关于积分的说明 9785618
捐赠科研通 2939954
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1611546
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 760987
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 736344