A comparison between hyaluronic acid and other single ingredient eye drops for dry eye, a review

医学 透明质酸 眼药水 梅德林 内科学 眼科 生物 生物化学 解剖
作者
Leif Hynnekleiv,Morten Schjerven Magnø,Emily Moschowits,Kim Alexander Tønseth,Jelle Vehof,Tor Paaske Utheim
出处
期刊:Acta Ophthalmologica [Wiley]
卷期号:102 (1): 25-37 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1111/aos.15675
摘要

Abstract Dry eye disease (DED) is a highly prevalent and debilitating condition. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a naturally occurring glycosaminoglycan that has a long history as a safe and effective DED treatment. HA is frequently used as a comparator when assessing other topical DED treatments. This study aims to summarise and critically evaluate the literature describing all isolated active ingredients that have been directly compared with HA in the treatment of DED. A literature search was conducted in Embase using Ovid on the 24th of August 2021 and in PubMed including MEDLINE on the 20th of September 2021. Twenty‐three studies met the inclusion criteria, 21 of which were randomised controlled trials. Seventeen different ingredients representing six treatment categories were compared with HA treatment. Most measures showed no significant difference between treatments, suggesting either equivalency of treatments or that studies were underpowered. Only two ingredients were represented in more than two studies; carboxymethyl cellulose treatment appears equivalent to HA treatment, while Diquafosol treatment appears superior to HA treatment. Drop‐frequency varied from one to eight drops daily. No single study explained the choice of drop frequency. Nine studies used a HA concentration of 0.1% which may be below therapeutic levels. Nine studies reported using preserved formulations, six of them with differences in preservatives between the compared groups. Thirteen studies were financially linked to industry. No major complications were reported. Studies were not designed to find differences in treatment effects for different types or severities of DED. HA is a good comparator treatment when assessing other DED treatments, although consensus after decades of use is still lacking for best choice of concentration, molecular weight and drop tonicity. Well‐designed studies are needed to determine an evidence‐based standard for HA treatment to be used as comparator.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
跳跃尔琴发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Jasper应助goodfish采纳,获得10
刚刚
迅哥发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
丝竹丛中墨未干完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
supermaltose发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
su园长应助Ava采纳,获得10
4秒前
科研通AI2S应助超级的煎饼采纳,获得10
5秒前
兜兜应助暴躁的信封采纳,获得10
7秒前
写小人物的大作家完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
木子李完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
10秒前
洛洛完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
安东路完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
华仔应助白玉汤顿首采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
阿睿发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
呼延子默完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
18秒前
李健应助NANA西采纳,获得10
18秒前
CipherSage应助科研靓仔采纳,获得10
18秒前
神揽星辰入梦完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
半夏完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
茹茵湖发布了新的文献求助20
19秒前
19秒前
共享精神应助prince8891采纳,获得10
19秒前
zzz发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
英姑应助朴实的天晴采纳,获得10
20秒前
黑溜溜完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
白玉汤顿首完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
深夜空想家完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
23秒前
supermaltose完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
菜菜Cc发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
24秒前
linlinzi发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Foreign Policy of the French Second Empire: A Bibliography 500
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
XAFS for Everyone 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3143628
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2795064
关于积分的说明 7813166
捐赠科研通 2451128
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1304317
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627213
版权声明 601393