医学
急性呼吸窘迫综合征
奇纳
随机对照试验
重症监护医学
梅德林
人口
心理干预
内科学
急诊医学
精神科
肺
环境卫生
政治学
法学
作者
Simran Ganeriwal,Gabriele Alves dos Anjos,Mary Schleicher,Maxwell A. Hockstein,Adriano R. Tonelli,Abhijit Duggal,Matthew T. Siuba
出处
期刊:Critical Care
[Springer Nature]
日期:2023-03-12
卷期号:27 (1)
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1186/s13054-023-04395-9
摘要
To summarize knowledge and identify gaps in evidence regarding treatment of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.Studies were included if they reported effects of treatments on right ventricular function, whether or not the intent was to modify right ventricular function.Data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate by two authors. Data items included the study design, patient population, type of intervention, comparison group, and RV-specific outcomes.Of 1,430 studies screened, 51 studies reporting on 1,526 patients were included. By frequency, the included studies examined the following interventions: ventilator settings (29.4%), inhaled medications (33.3%), extracorporeal life support (13.7%), intravenous or oral medications (13.7%), and prone positioning (9.8%). The majority of the studies were non-randomized experimental studies (53%), with the next most common being case reports (16%). Only 5.9% of studies were RCTs. In total, 27% of studies were conducted with the goal of modifying RV function.Given the prevalence of RVD in ARDS and its association with mortality, the dearth of research on this topic is concerning. This review highlights the need for prospective trials aimed at treating RV dysfunction in ARDS.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI