作者
J.-L. Brun,Geneviève Plu‐Bureau,Cyrille Huchon,X. Ah-Kit,Matthias Barral,Pauline Chauvet,F. Cornelis,Marion Cortet,Patrice Crochet,V. Delporte,Gil Dubernard,Géraldine Giraudet,A. Gosset,Olivier Graesslin,Justine Hugon‐Rodin,Lise Lecointre,Guillaume Legendre,Lorraine Maitrot-Mantelet,Louis Marcellin,Laura Miquel,Marine Le Mitouard,C. Proust,A. Roquette,Pascal Rousset,E. Sangnier,Marc Sapoval,T. Thubert,Antoine Torre,F. Trémollières,H. Vernhet-Kovacsik,Fabien Vidal,H. Marret
摘要
To provide French guidelines for the management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding (i.e. pharmaceutical or medical device companies). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized.The last guidelines from the Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français on the management of women with AUB were published in 2008. The literature seems now sufficient for an update. The committee studied questions within 7 fields (diagnosis; adolescents; idiopathic AUB; endometrial hyperplasia and polyps; type 0-2 fibroids; type 3 or higher fibroids; and adenomyosis). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and evidence profiles were compiled. The GRADE® methodology was applied to the literature review and the formulation of recommendations.The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 36 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 are strong and 17 weak. No response was found in the literature for 14 questions. We chose to abstain from recommendations rather than providing advice based solely on expert clinical experience.The 36 recommendations make it possible to specify the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for various clinical situations practitioners encounter, from the simplest to the most complex.