Predictors of Positive Repeat Blood Cultures in Patients With Gram-Negative Bacilli Bacteremia

菌血症 医学 内科学 球菌(昆虫) 逐步回归 血培养 抗生素 生态学 生物 微生物学
作者
Daniel Gao,Juliann Ek,Emily George,Paige Ewing,Michael Oravec,Joseph P. Myers
出处
期刊:Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:31 (4): 1-5
标识
DOI:10.1097/ipc.0000000000001274
摘要

Introduction Bloodstream infections occur commonly in the United States and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Bacteremia caused by gram-positive organisms has established guidelines for the use of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs), whereas the use of FUBCs in bacteremia due to gram-negative bacilli (GNBs) does not. One study showed that positive FUBCs were more common in gram-positive coccus bacteremia (21%) than in GNB bacteremia (6%), calling into question the overall clinical utility of using FUBCs in GNB bacteremia. We investigated the factors associated with positive FUBCs in patients with GNB bacteremia in our institution to better guide clinical practice. Methods We used a case-control design for this study. We included patients 18 years or older admitted to our hospitals between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, for a duration of ≥24 hours and who had a positive blood culture (BC) for GNB. Cases were defined as any patient with a positive FUBC drawn ≥24 hours after the initial positive BC. Control subjects were defined as patients with a negative FUBC after an initial positive BC. Characteristics of cases and control subjects were compared using descriptive statistics. A multivariable regression model using stepwise variable selection was used to identify factors significantly associated with having a positive FUBC. Results We identified 70 cases meeting the inclusion criteria. We compared these 70 cases with 528 control subjects. The cases and control subjects did not differ significantly in age, sex, race, or other predefined comorbid conditions. Significant predictors for having a positive FUBC included (1) organism resistance to initial antibiotic therapy (odds ratio [OR], 3.26; P = 0.035), (2) glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min (OR, 2.35; P = 0.010), (3) initial admission to critical care unit (OR, 1.72; P = 0.049), (4) central line–associated infection (OR, 3.99; P = 0.004), (5) Klebsiella group infection (OR, 2.18; P = 0.015), and (6) Serratia marcescens infection (OR, 3.53; P = 0.037). Initial discordant BC was a negative predictive factor (OR, 0.44; P = 0.018). Follow-up blood culture drawn more than 48 hours after the initial positive BC had a lower likelihood of being positive than those drawn 24 to 48 hours after the initial BC (OR, 0.59; P = 0.037). Discussion We identified 6 independent risk factors for positive FUBCs as delineated previously. These factors provide guidance for further research and for future guideline development. The timing of the FUBCs had a significant impact on positivity. Follow-up blood cultures in GNB bacteremia should be obtained more than 48 hours after the initial positive BC.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
hhl完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
丽丽完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
夏林完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
蚊蚊爱读书完成签到,获得积分0
1秒前
哎呀完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
MKY完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
今年我必胖20斤完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
科研通AI2S应助酷炫大米采纳,获得10
3秒前
mingshi完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
番茄黄瓜芝士片完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
孤独夏天完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
zzuzll发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
充电宝应助平淡黑裤采纳,获得10
5秒前
忐忑的访彤完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
guoxihan发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
菠萝吹雪完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
钟馗完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ttkd11完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Polling完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
JamesPei应助小猪采纳,获得10
9秒前
再沉默发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
安安完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
皮皮完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
孟庆磊完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
Angel完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
陶醉的君浩完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
想吃泡粉完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
goodbai完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
yy完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
从容灭绝发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine Third Edition 5000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 3000
Aerospace Engineering Education During the First Century of Flight 2000
从k到英国情人 1700
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5773777
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5613486
关于积分的说明 15432599
捐赠科研通 4906156
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2640083
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1587955
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1542987