The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index-Metabolic Domains, an abridged version of the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: post-hoc analysis of data from the ADVOCATE trial

糖皮质激素 强的松 析因分析 毒性 事后 人口 随机对照试验 临床试验 医学 内科学 环境卫生
作者
Naomi J. Patel,David Jayne,Peter A. Merkel,Pirow Bekker,Yuqing Zhang,P. Jane McDowell,J. Johal,Liam G. Heaney,Dédée F. Murrell,Martha N. Stone,Huibin Yue,John H. Stone
出处
期刊:The Lancet Rheumatology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:5 (7): e413-e421 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2665-9913(23)00131-5
摘要

Background Quantifying glucocorticoid toxicity is crucial to efforts to reduce it. The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) measures toxicity effectively in clinical trials by calculating two scores: the cumulative worsening score (CWS) and the aggregate improvement score (AIS). However, in clinical practice, high patient volumes limit the time available for standardised assessments. We aimed to compare the GTI with an abbreviated version of the GTI, the GTI-Metabolic Domains (GTI-MD), which could help to address this issue by using data that are collected easily at routine visits and do not require additional effort from clinicians. Methods We did a post-hoc analysis of data from ADVOCATE, a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial in which avacopan replaced a standard prednisone taper in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. We calculated the cumulative worsening score (CWS) and aggregate improvement score (AIS) for each domain of the GTI-MD—comprising the BMI, glucose tolerance, blood pressure, and lipid metabolism domains of the GTI—to test its ability to differentiate the avacopan and prednisone groups by glucocorticoid toxicity. Data from two additional disease cohorts, one comprising patients with asthma and the other comprising patients with autoimmune blistering disease, constituted the validation set. Findings Complete data were available for 321 (97%) of the 330 participants comprising the intention-to-treat population in the ADVOCATE trial at week 13, and 307 (93%) at week 26; data from these individuals were included in our post-hoc analysis. In ADVOCATE, 98 (59%) of 166 participants in the avacopan group were men and 68 (41%) were women, 88 (54%) of 164 in the prednisone group were men and 76 (46%) were women; the mean age of participants was 61·2 years [SD 14·6] in the avacopan group and 60·5 years [14·5] in the prednisone group. The validation cohort included 159 patients (89 with glucocorticoid-dependent asthma, of whom 40 [45%] were men and 49 [55%] were women, and 70 with autoimmune blistering disease of the skin, of whom 30 [43%] were men and 40 [57%] were women). The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient in ADVOCATE for the GTI-MD CWS with the GTI CWS for the treatment groups combined was 0·78 (95% CI 0·75–0·81; p<0·0001). The corresponding correlation for the AIS was 0·73 (0·69–0·77, p<0·0001). The GTI-MD distinguished the groups by glucocorticoid toxicity at both 13 weeks and 26 weeks. The mean GTI-MD CWS was lower in the avacopan group than in the prednisone group, consistent with less toxicity (15·9 vs 23·0 at 13 weeks [p=0·0010]; 26·7 vs 31·7 at 26 weeks [p=0·0092]). The GTI-MD AIS values were also consistent with less toxicity in the avacopan group (2·5 vs 13·0 at 13 weeks [p=0·0003], 4·4 vs 10·1 at 26 weeks [p=0·027]). A GTI-MD score of 0 corresponded to a low likelihood of toxicity in the other GTI domains. In the validation set, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for the GTI-MD CWS with the GTI CWS was 0·61 (95% CI 0·50–0·70; p<0·0001) and the corresponding correlation for the AIS was 0·58 (0·47–0·68; p<0·0001). Interpretation The GTI-MD correlates well with the full GTI and could be incorporated readily into routine clinic workflows without additional input from the clinician. Using the GTI-MD on the background of electronic medical records systems could help clinicians to monitor glucocorticoid toxicity longitudinally, with the goals of preventing the burden of chronic, treatment-related harms and reducing long-term costs to health systems. Funding ChemoCentryx.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
淘宝叮咚发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
淘宝叮咚发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
淘宝叮咚发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Frank的应助被开心德地采纳,获得10
刚刚
吴晨曦的应助被开心德地采纳,获得10
刚刚
麻衣少年完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
ChatGPT发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
MM完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
叶子完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
pei完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
落落完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
Yultuz友发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
占那个完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
小曲同学完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
小蘑菇的应助被南翔彬采纳,获得10
19秒前
hhhh_xt完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
爱听歌小蚂蚁完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
桃子完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
Frank的应助被开心德地采纳,获得10
23秒前
24秒前
俏皮的一一完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
束玲玲完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
linn1关注了科研通微信公众号
31秒前
邵邵完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
Loong完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
魏凯源完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
Ricky小强完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
神外王001完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
儒雅颜完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
Yultuz友完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
Frank的应助被开心德地采纳,获得10
42秒前
微笑的严青完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
酷炫的大碗完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
阿萨德完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
林北bei完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
52秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
IRTSD: Open-Source Data and Toolset for Electromagnetic Transient Analysis of Disturbances and IBR Control Malfunctions in Transmission Systems 1000
Entre Praga y Madrid : los contactos checoslovaco-españoles (1948-1977) 600
Les Mots du discours 600
A Consideration on Use of Material Grades for Hull Structural Members Based on Fracture Toughness(Second Report) 500
AI Disclosure in Annual Reports: Evolution, Determinants, and Capital Market Participants’ Perceptions 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8115619
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9521517
关于积分的说明 21533833
捐赠科研通 7693815
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3413595
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2539935
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2453622