The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index-Metabolic Domains, an abridged version of the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index: post-hoc analysis of data from the ADVOCATE trial

糖皮质激素 强的松 析因分析 毒性 事后 人口 随机对照试验 临床试验 医学 内科学 环境卫生
作者
Naomi J. Patel,David Jayne,Peter A. Merkel,Pirow Bekker,Yuqing Zhang,P. Jane McDowell,J. Johal,Liam G. Heaney,Dédée F. Murrell,Martha N. Stone,Huibin Yue,John H. Stone
出处
期刊:The Lancet Rheumatology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:5 (7): e413-e421 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2665-9913(23)00131-5
摘要

Background Quantifying glucocorticoid toxicity is crucial to efforts to reduce it. The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) measures toxicity effectively in clinical trials by calculating two scores: the cumulative worsening score (CWS) and the aggregate improvement score (AIS). However, in clinical practice, high patient volumes limit the time available for standardised assessments. We aimed to compare the GTI with an abbreviated version of the GTI, the GTI-Metabolic Domains (GTI-MD), which could help to address this issue by using data that are collected easily at routine visits and do not require additional effort from clinicians. Methods We did a post-hoc analysis of data from ADVOCATE, a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial in which avacopan replaced a standard prednisone taper in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. We calculated the cumulative worsening score (CWS) and aggregate improvement score (AIS) for each domain of the GTI-MD—comprising the BMI, glucose tolerance, blood pressure, and lipid metabolism domains of the GTI—to test its ability to differentiate the avacopan and prednisone groups by glucocorticoid toxicity. Data from two additional disease cohorts, one comprising patients with asthma and the other comprising patients with autoimmune blistering disease, constituted the validation set. Findings Complete data were available for 321 (97%) of the 330 participants comprising the intention-to-treat population in the ADVOCATE trial at week 13, and 307 (93%) at week 26; data from these individuals were included in our post-hoc analysis. In ADVOCATE, 98 (59%) of 166 participants in the avacopan group were men and 68 (41%) were women, 88 (54%) of 164 in the prednisone group were men and 76 (46%) were women; the mean age of participants was 61·2 years [SD 14·6] in the avacopan group and 60·5 years [14·5] in the prednisone group. The validation cohort included 159 patients (89 with glucocorticoid-dependent asthma, of whom 40 [45%] were men and 49 [55%] were women, and 70 with autoimmune blistering disease of the skin, of whom 30 [43%] were men and 40 [57%] were women). The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient in ADVOCATE for the GTI-MD CWS with the GTI CWS for the treatment groups combined was 0·78 (95% CI 0·75–0·81; p<0·0001). The corresponding correlation for the AIS was 0·73 (0·69–0·77, p<0·0001). The GTI-MD distinguished the groups by glucocorticoid toxicity at both 13 weeks and 26 weeks. The mean GTI-MD CWS was lower in the avacopan group than in the prednisone group, consistent with less toxicity (15·9 vs 23·0 at 13 weeks [p=0·0010]; 26·7 vs 31·7 at 26 weeks [p=0·0092]). The GTI-MD AIS values were also consistent with less toxicity in the avacopan group (2·5 vs 13·0 at 13 weeks [p=0·0003], 4·4 vs 10·1 at 26 weeks [p=0·027]). A GTI-MD score of 0 corresponded to a low likelihood of toxicity in the other GTI domains. In the validation set, the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for the GTI-MD CWS with the GTI CWS was 0·61 (95% CI 0·50–0·70; p<0·0001) and the corresponding correlation for the AIS was 0·58 (0·47–0·68; p<0·0001). Interpretation The GTI-MD correlates well with the full GTI and could be incorporated readily into routine clinic workflows without additional input from the clinician. Using the GTI-MD on the background of electronic medical records systems could help clinicians to monitor glucocorticoid toxicity longitudinally, with the goals of preventing the burden of chronic, treatment-related harms and reducing long-term costs to health systems. Funding ChemoCentryx.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
张张完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
儒雅的凝蕊关注了科研通微信公众号
刚刚
LUO完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
叮叮当当当完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
啦啦啦啦发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
钟小先生发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
7秒前
李爱国应助小夭采纳,获得10
7秒前
科研通AI6.3应助小夭采纳,获得10
7秒前
Misaki完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
科研通AI6.4应助小夭采纳,获得10
7秒前
完美世界应助小夭采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研通AI6.3应助HYH采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研通AI6.3应助小夭采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
科研通AI6.2应助小夭采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
科研通AI6.3应助小夭采纳,获得10
8秒前
CipherSage应助小夭采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研通AI6.2应助小夭采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI6.4应助小夭采纳,获得10
9秒前
甜蜜花发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
24发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
jin发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
mojiali发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
patrick7400发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
健忘魔镜完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
iceeer发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
bkagyin应助???采纳,获得10
14秒前
渔婆发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
斯文败类应助暗转采纳,获得10
15秒前
zxc完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
彭于晏应助Windsyang采纳,获得10
16秒前
沙新镇完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7515768
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9103965
关于积分的说明 19434003
捐赠科研通 7121083
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3253694
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2422495
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2240476