A Retrospective Comparison of Headless Versus Standard Interlocking Screw Fixation of Tibia Intramedullary Nails

医学 髓内棒 胫骨 外科 四分位间距 联锁 固定(群体遗传学) 胫骨骨折 骨愈合 口腔正畸科 牙科 人口 机械工程 环境卫生 工程类
作者
Benjamin D. Pesante,Byron A. Ward,Stephen Stacey,Joshua A. Parry
标识
DOI:10.5435/jaaos-d-24-00703
摘要

Introduction: Symptomatic interlocking screws are common after intramedullary nail fixation of tibia fractures. Low-profile headless interlocking screws recently became available and could potentially reduce the rate of symptomatic screws. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of symptomatic screws and screw removals between these screw types. Methods: A retrospective review identified patients with tibia shaft fractures treated with tibia intramedullary nails between August 1, 2018 to September 1, 2023 by 11 surgeons. Low-profile headless interlocking screws became available on June 28, 2021 and were routinely used thereafter. Patients treated with low-profile headless versus standard headed interlocking screws were compared in terms of symptomatic screws, defined as a patient reporting pain or discomfort at the site of a screw head in clinical documentation, symptomatic screw removals, screw failure (breakage or backout), and procedures to promote bone union. Results: Overall, 79 patients were included in the analysis: 33 patients treated with 144 headless screws and 46 patients treated with 187 standard screws. The median patient age was 35 years, and a majority were male (68.4%, n = 54). The median follow-up length was 8.5 months (interquartile range 5.5 to 8.8 months). The headless screw group, compared with standard screw group, did not differ in age, injury mechanism severity, open fracture classification, tobacco use, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification >2, number of interlocking screws used, or follow-up time ( P > 0.05). The headless screw group was less likely to have symptomatic screws (0.0% vs. 23.9%; P = 0.002), less likely to have symptomatic screw removal (0.0% vs. 13.0%; P = 0.03), and had no difference in procedures to promote bone union (10.0% vs. 6.8%; P = 0.68) or screw backout (0.0% vs. 4.4%; P = 0.50). Discussion: Standard headed interlocking screws were symptomatic in 23.9% of patients and 13.0% underwent symptomatic screw removal. In comparison, no patients treated with low-profile headless interlocking screws had symptomatic screws. Level of Evidence: Level 3, diagnostic

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
今后应助美好绾绾采纳,获得10
2秒前
大模型应助席成风采纳,获得10
2秒前
xhtnt97发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
哩哩发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
Au_应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
6秒前
岂曰无衣应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
可爱的函函应助MutantKitten采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
Copyright应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
酷波er应助江直树附体采纳,获得10
7秒前
安静沅给安静沅的求助进行了留言
7秒前
Hello应助小透明采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI6.3应助小透明采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI6.4应助小透明采纳,获得10
9秒前
小蘑菇应助小透明采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI6.4应助小透明采纳,获得10
9秒前
我是老大应助小透明采纳,获得30
9秒前
科研通AI2S应助小透明采纳,获得10
9秒前
悦耳的怀寒应助小透明采纳,获得10
9秒前
万能图书馆应助小透明采纳,获得10
9秒前
Rui_Rui应助从容的妙芹采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
打打应助DG采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
manfullmoon发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
星懿发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
16秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
Merrill's Atlas of Radiographic Positioning and Procedures - 3-Volume Set, 16th Edition 2000
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 800
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 540
Interactions of Vowel Quality and Prosody in East Slavic 500
Vander's Renal Physiology第10版 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7053430
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8717534
关于积分的说明 18456549
捐赠科研通 6572695
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3120929
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2210173
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2096678