A Retrospective Comparison of Headless Versus Standard Interlocking Screw Fixation of Tibia Intramedullary Nails

医学 髓内棒 胫骨 外科 四分位间距 联锁 固定(群体遗传学) 胫骨骨折 骨愈合 口腔正畸科 牙科 人口 机械工程 环境卫生 工程类
作者
Benjamin D. Pesante,Byron A. Ward,Stephen Stacey,Joshua A. Parry
标识
DOI:10.5435/jaaos-d-24-00703
摘要

Introduction: Symptomatic interlocking screws are common after intramedullary nail fixation of tibia fractures. Low-profile headless interlocking screws recently became available and could potentially reduce the rate of symptomatic screws. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of symptomatic screws and screw removals between these screw types. Methods: A retrospective review identified patients with tibia shaft fractures treated with tibia intramedullary nails between August 1, 2018 to September 1, 2023 by 11 surgeons. Low-profile headless interlocking screws became available on June 28, 2021 and were routinely used thereafter. Patients treated with low-profile headless versus standard headed interlocking screws were compared in terms of symptomatic screws, defined as a patient reporting pain or discomfort at the site of a screw head in clinical documentation, symptomatic screw removals, screw failure (breakage or backout), and procedures to promote bone union. Results: Overall, 79 patients were included in the analysis: 33 patients treated with 144 headless screws and 46 patients treated with 187 standard screws. The median patient age was 35 years, and a majority were male (68.4%, n = 54). The median follow-up length was 8.5 months (interquartile range 5.5 to 8.8 months). The headless screw group, compared with standard screw group, did not differ in age, injury mechanism severity, open fracture classification, tobacco use, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification >2, number of interlocking screws used, or follow-up time ( P > 0.05). The headless screw group was less likely to have symptomatic screws (0.0% vs. 23.9%; P = 0.002), less likely to have symptomatic screw removal (0.0% vs. 13.0%; P = 0.03), and had no difference in procedures to promote bone union (10.0% vs. 6.8%; P = 0.68) or screw backout (0.0% vs. 4.4%; P = 0.50). Discussion: Standard headed interlocking screws were symptomatic in 23.9% of patients and 13.0% underwent symptomatic screw removal. In comparison, no patients treated with low-profile headless interlocking screws had symptomatic screws. Level of Evidence: Level 3, diagnostic

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
李健应助小雅采纳,获得10
3秒前
大力的灵雁应助whr采纳,获得30
3秒前
王yuu发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
乐乐应助支若蕊采纳,获得10
6秒前
果汁发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
嘿嘿发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
10秒前
nglmy77完成签到 ,获得积分0
10秒前
王yuu完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
11秒前
gyh应助奋斗寒松采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
Worker发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
懒得可爱发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
陆家麟发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
漂亮藏今发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
小马甲应助tyj采纳,获得10
17秒前
Aliothae完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
20秒前
义气严青完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
搜集达人应助liu11采纳,获得10
21秒前
22秒前
英姑应助陆家麟采纳,获得10
24秒前
xiaohei发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
共享精神应助有机分子笼采纳,获得10
24秒前
爆米花应助小宇子采纳,获得10
25秒前
淡淡博完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
曹博发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
墨墨发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
28秒前
果汁完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6026593
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7670703
关于积分的说明 16183288
捐赠科研通 5174539
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2768806
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1752171
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1638066