生物
CD8型
CD19
免疫学
B细胞
内科学
抗原
抗体
医学
作者
Yi‐Jiun Su,Anne Marijn Kramer,Mark P. Hamilton,Neha Agarwal,Hrishikesh K. Srinagesh,John H. Baird,Bita Sahaf,Adam Kuo,Zachary Ehlinger,Moksha H. Desai,Skyler P. Rietberg,Ramya Tunuguntla,Shabnum Patel,Harshini Chinnasamy,Nikolaos Gkitsas,Dorota D. Klysz,Annie Kathleen Brown,Sushma Bharadwaj,Saurabh Dahiya,Melody Smith
标识
DOI:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-1071
摘要
Abstract Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) progressing after anti-CD19 CAR T-cell (CAR19) therapy have poor outcomes. Subsequent CAR T-cell therapy shows promise, but the impact of residual CAR19 and early relapse remains unclear. We evaluated 37 CAR19-refractory LBCL patients who received anti-CD22 CAR T-cell (CAR22) in a phase 1b trial (NCT04088890). Residual CAR19 was unquantifiable in 17 of 33 evaluable patients post-CAR22 infusion. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed minimal CAR19/CAR22 co-transduction. Peak CAR19 transgene levels did not affect CAR22 efficacy or toxicities. CAR22 products from patients undergoing leukapheresis > 6 months post-CAR19 had higher CD4+ naïve T and CD4+/CD8+ T- central memory (TCM) cells, with lower CD4+ T-effector memory cells. High and low percentages of CAR22 TCM and TEM, respectively, were correlated with CAR22 transduction efficiency and achieving complete response. Residual CAR19 and leukapheresis timing did not significantly affect outcomes, while CAR22 product composition was significantly correlated with treatment response.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI